医学
阿奇霉素
感染性休克
倾向得分匹配
机械通风
休克(循环)
重症监护
回顾性队列研究
内科学
抗生素
重症监护医学
急诊医学
败血症
生物
微生物学
作者
Joseph M. Johnson,Raymond Yost,Mark Pangrazzi,Katri A. Golden,Ayman O. Soubani,Krista Wahby
标识
DOI:10.1177/08971900211064193
摘要
Introduction: Although there is evidence describing the immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics, there is little literature exploring the clinical effects these properties may have and their impact on measurable outcomes. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if empiric antimicrobial regimens containing azithromycin shorten time to shock resolution. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in adults with septic shock admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) of 3 university-affiliated, urban teaching hospitals between June 2012 and June 2016. Eligible patients with septic shock required treatment with norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor for a minimum of 4 hours and received at least 48 hours of antimicrobial treatment from the time of shock onset. Propensity scores were utilized to match patients who received azithromycin to those who did not. Results: A total of 3116 patients met initial inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 258 patients were included, with 124 and 134 patients in the azithromycin and control groups, respectively. Median shock duration was similar in patients treated with or without azithromycin (45.6 hr vs 59.7 hr, P = .44). In-hospital mortality was also similar (37.9% vs 38.1%, P = .979). There were no significant differences in mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay (LOS), or hospital LOS. Conclusions: In patients admitted to the ICU with septic shock, empiric azithromycin did not have a significant effect on shock duration, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, or in-hospital mortality.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI