Expanding Heart Transplants from Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD) - Results of the First Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Organ Care System (OCS™) Heart - (OCS DCD Heart Trial)

医学 循环系统 随机对照试验 心脏移植 心脏病学 重症监护医学 内科学 心力衰竭
作者
Jacob N. Schroder,A. Shah,Victor Pretorius,J.W. Smith,Mani A. Daneshmand,Arnar Geirsson,Si M. Pham,J. Um,Scott C. Silvestry,Andrew Shaffer,Karol Mudy,Masashi Kai,David L. Joyce,Jonathan M. Philpott,Koji Takeda,Daniel Goldstein,Yasuhiro Shudo,G.S. Couper,H. Mallidi,F. Esmailian,D. Pham,Christopher T. Salerno,Lucian Lozonschi,Mohammed Quader,Chetan B. Patel,Adam D. DeVore,Benjamin S. Bryner,Joren C. Madsen,Tarek Absi,C. Milano,Donna M. D’Alessandro
出处
期刊:Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation [Elsevier]
卷期号:41 (4): S72-S72 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.165
摘要

Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of the OCS Heart technology to resuscitate, preserve and assess DCD hearts for transplantation. Methods OCS DCD Heart Trial included the following donor inclusion criteria: Maastricht Category III DCD donor, donor age 18-49 years old, warm ischemic time (WIT) ≤30 mins. Donor exclusions: Previous history of cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction, terminal EF of ≤50%, or significant valve disease. Recipient inclusion criteria: primary adult heart transplant candidates. Recipient exclusion: multi-organ transplant candidates, history of prior solid organ or bone marrow transplants, history of chronic renal failure, or unrandomized recipients. Candidates were randomized 3:1 into two groups: DCD Heart Possible (DCD) or DBD cold stored hearts (Control). The trial protocol final analysis was prespecified to compare the post-transplant outcome from recipients of DCD hearts preserved on OCS (DCD) to all those who received DBD hearts preserved with cold storage (DBD Control). Endpoints Patient survival at 6- and 12-months post-transplantation. Other endpoints included; OCS DCD hearts utilization rate defined as the number of DCD hearts transplanted after OCS perfusion divided by the total number of eligible DCD donor hearts that were instrumented on OCS, incidence of severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD. Safety endpoint was defined as the incidence of Heart Graft-related Serious Adverse Events (HGRSAEs) in the first 30 days post-transplant defined as moderate or severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD, or primary graft failure requiring re-transplantation. Results A total of 180 patients were randomized and transplanted in the trial (DCD-OCS n=90 and Control-DBD n=90) at 13 heart transplant centers in the U.S. between 2019 and 2020. There was a total of 101 DCD donor hearts instrumented on OCS Heart technology, of those 90 were transplanted for an overall DCD hearts utilization rate of 89% (90/101). Donors and Recipients' demographics and risk factors were similar between the two arms except for age (donors- DCD 29.3 ± 7.5 vs Control 33.2 ± 11.4) (recipients- DCD-OCS 51.3 ± 12.6 vs Control-DBD 55.0 ± 11.4 p=0.041). Patient survival at 6 months was DCD 94.4% vs Control 88.6% p<0.0001, and graft survival at 6 months was DCD 98.9% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Patient survival at 1 year was DCD 93.3% vs Control 87.3%, and graft survival at 1 year was DCD 97.7% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Safety endpoint was similar between both trial arms DCD 0.2 HGRSAE per patient vs Control 0.1 HGRSAE per patient. Incidence of moderate or severe ISHLT PGD was 20% in DCD arm vs. 9.1% in Control arm. Incidence of primary graft failure was 0% in the DCD arm vs 2.2% in Control. Conclusion The OCS DCD Heart trial was the first ever randomized trial comparing DCD heart transplant to DBD standard criteria heart transplant clinical outcomes. The trial demonstrated that the use of OCS Heart resulted in high rate of DCD heart utilization for transplantation with excellent patient and graft survival outcomes compared to DBD donor hearts. These results support the increased use of DCD hearts for transplantation to expand the pool of donor hearts for transplantation.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Patient & Graft Survival. To evaluate the effectiveness of the OCS Heart technology to resuscitate, preserve and assess DCD hearts for transplantation. OCS DCD Heart Trial included the following donor inclusion criteria: Maastricht Category III DCD donor, donor age 18-49 years old, warm ischemic time (WIT) ≤30 mins. Donor exclusions: Previous history of cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction, terminal EF of ≤50%, or significant valve disease. Recipient inclusion criteria: primary adult heart transplant candidates. Recipient exclusion: multi-organ transplant candidates, history of prior solid organ or bone marrow transplants, history of chronic renal failure, or unrandomized recipients. Candidates were randomized 3:1 into two groups: DCD Heart Possible (DCD) or DBD cold stored hearts (Control). The trial protocol final analysis was prespecified to compare the post-transplant outcome from recipients of DCD hearts preserved on OCS (DCD) to all those who received DBD hearts preserved with cold storage (DBD Control). Patient survival at 6- and 12-months post-transplantation. Other endpoints included; OCS DCD hearts utilization rate defined as the number of DCD hearts transplanted after OCS perfusion divided by the total number of eligible DCD donor hearts that were instrumented on OCS, incidence of severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD. Safety endpoint was defined as the incidence of Heart Graft-related Serious Adverse Events (HGRSAEs) in the first 30 days post-transplant defined as moderate or severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD, or primary graft failure requiring re-transplantation. A total of 180 patients were randomized and transplanted in the trial (DCD-OCS n=90 and Control-DBD n=90) at 13 heart transplant centers in the U.S. between 2019 and 2020. There was a total of 101 DCD donor hearts instrumented on OCS Heart technology, of those 90 were transplanted for an overall DCD hearts utilization rate of 89% (90/101). Donors and Recipients' demographics and risk factors were similar between the two arms except for age (donors- DCD 29.3 ± 7.5 vs Control 33.2 ± 11.4) (recipients- DCD-OCS 51.3 ± 12.6 vs Control-DBD 55.0 ± 11.4 p=0.041). Patient survival at 6 months was DCD 94.4% vs Control 88.6% p<0.0001, and graft survival at 6 months was DCD 98.9% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Patient survival at 1 year was DCD 93.3% vs Control 87.3%, and graft survival at 1 year was DCD 97.7% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Safety endpoint was similar between both trial arms DCD 0.2 HGRSAE per patient vs Control 0.1 HGRSAE per patient. Incidence of moderate or severe ISHLT PGD was 20% in DCD arm vs. 9.1% in Control arm. Incidence of primary graft failure was 0% in the DCD arm vs 2.2% in Control. The OCS DCD Heart trial was the first ever randomized trial comparing DCD heart transplant to DBD standard criteria heart transplant clinical outcomes. The trial demonstrated that the use of OCS Heart resulted in high rate of DCD heart utilization for transplantation with excellent patient and graft survival outcomes compared to DBD donor hearts. These results support the increased use of DCD hearts for transplantation to expand the pool of donor hearts for transplantation.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Patient & Graft Survival.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
shatang完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
Owen应助一天八杯水采纳,获得10
1秒前
所所应助静静子采纳,获得10
2秒前
所所应助jy采纳,获得10
2秒前
hkxfg完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
duo完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
spurs17发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
善学以致用应助BaekHyun采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
nanhe698完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
李本来完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
看看发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ZZY完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
DQY完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
BONBON完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
动听导师发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
季忆完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
小周发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
smile发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
Lore完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
jiang完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
无奈的酒窝关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
毛毛完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
正在完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
充电宝应助JR采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
cc完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
李爱国应助111采纳,获得10
15秒前
jy发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
好好完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527928
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108040
关于积分的说明 9287614
捐赠科研通 2805836
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540070
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716904
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709808