亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Expanding Heart Transplants from Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD) - Results of the First Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Organ Care System (OCS™) Heart - (OCS DCD Heart Trial)

医学 循环系统 随机对照试验 心脏移植 心脏病学 重症监护医学 内科学 心力衰竭
作者
Jacob N. Schroder,A. Shah,Victor Pretorius,J.W. Smith,Mani A. Daneshmand,Arnar Geirsson,Si M. Pham,J. Um,Scott C. Silvestry,Andrew Shaffer,Karol Mudy,Masashi Kai,David L. Joyce,Jonathan M. Philpott,Koji Takeda,Daniel Goldstein,Yasuhiro Shudo,G.S. Couper,H. Mallidi,F. Esmailian,D. Pham,Christopher T. Salerno,Lucian Lozonschi,Mohammed Quader,Chetan B. Patel,Adam D. DeVore,Benjamin S. Bryner,Joren C. Madsen,Tarek Absi,C. Milano,Donna M. D’Alessandro
出处
期刊:Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation [Elsevier]
卷期号:41 (4): S72-S72 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.165
摘要

Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of the OCS Heart technology to resuscitate, preserve and assess DCD hearts for transplantation. Methods OCS DCD Heart Trial included the following donor inclusion criteria: Maastricht Category III DCD donor, donor age 18-49 years old, warm ischemic time (WIT) ≤30 mins. Donor exclusions: Previous history of cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction, terminal EF of ≤50%, or significant valve disease. Recipient inclusion criteria: primary adult heart transplant candidates. Recipient exclusion: multi-organ transplant candidates, history of prior solid organ or bone marrow transplants, history of chronic renal failure, or unrandomized recipients. Candidates were randomized 3:1 into two groups: DCD Heart Possible (DCD) or DBD cold stored hearts (Control). The trial protocol final analysis was prespecified to compare the post-transplant outcome from recipients of DCD hearts preserved on OCS (DCD) to all those who received DBD hearts preserved with cold storage (DBD Control). Endpoints Patient survival at 6- and 12-months post-transplantation. Other endpoints included; OCS DCD hearts utilization rate defined as the number of DCD hearts transplanted after OCS perfusion divided by the total number of eligible DCD donor hearts that were instrumented on OCS, incidence of severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD. Safety endpoint was defined as the incidence of Heart Graft-related Serious Adverse Events (HGRSAEs) in the first 30 days post-transplant defined as moderate or severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD, or primary graft failure requiring re-transplantation. Results A total of 180 patients were randomized and transplanted in the trial (DCD-OCS n=90 and Control-DBD n=90) at 13 heart transplant centers in the U.S. between 2019 and 2020. There was a total of 101 DCD donor hearts instrumented on OCS Heart technology, of those 90 were transplanted for an overall DCD hearts utilization rate of 89% (90/101). Donors and Recipients' demographics and risk factors were similar between the two arms except for age (donors- DCD 29.3 ± 7.5 vs Control 33.2 ± 11.4) (recipients- DCD-OCS 51.3 ± 12.6 vs Control-DBD 55.0 ± 11.4 p=0.041). Patient survival at 6 months was DCD 94.4% vs Control 88.6% p<0.0001, and graft survival at 6 months was DCD 98.9% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Patient survival at 1 year was DCD 93.3% vs Control 87.3%, and graft survival at 1 year was DCD 97.7% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Safety endpoint was similar between both trial arms DCD 0.2 HGRSAE per patient vs Control 0.1 HGRSAE per patient. Incidence of moderate or severe ISHLT PGD was 20% in DCD arm vs. 9.1% in Control arm. Incidence of primary graft failure was 0% in the DCD arm vs 2.2% in Control. Conclusion The OCS DCD Heart trial was the first ever randomized trial comparing DCD heart transplant to DBD standard criteria heart transplant clinical outcomes. The trial demonstrated that the use of OCS Heart resulted in high rate of DCD heart utilization for transplantation with excellent patient and graft survival outcomes compared to DBD donor hearts. These results support the increased use of DCD hearts for transplantation to expand the pool of donor hearts for transplantation.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Patient & Graft Survival. To evaluate the effectiveness of the OCS Heart technology to resuscitate, preserve and assess DCD hearts for transplantation. OCS DCD Heart Trial included the following donor inclusion criteria: Maastricht Category III DCD donor, donor age 18-49 years old, warm ischemic time (WIT) ≤30 mins. Donor exclusions: Previous history of cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction, terminal EF of ≤50%, or significant valve disease. Recipient inclusion criteria: primary adult heart transplant candidates. Recipient exclusion: multi-organ transplant candidates, history of prior solid organ or bone marrow transplants, history of chronic renal failure, or unrandomized recipients. Candidates were randomized 3:1 into two groups: DCD Heart Possible (DCD) or DBD cold stored hearts (Control). The trial protocol final analysis was prespecified to compare the post-transplant outcome from recipients of DCD hearts preserved on OCS (DCD) to all those who received DBD hearts preserved with cold storage (DBD Control). Patient survival at 6- and 12-months post-transplantation. Other endpoints included; OCS DCD hearts utilization rate defined as the number of DCD hearts transplanted after OCS perfusion divided by the total number of eligible DCD donor hearts that were instrumented on OCS, incidence of severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD. Safety endpoint was defined as the incidence of Heart Graft-related Serious Adverse Events (HGRSAEs) in the first 30 days post-transplant defined as moderate or severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD, or primary graft failure requiring re-transplantation. A total of 180 patients were randomized and transplanted in the trial (DCD-OCS n=90 and Control-DBD n=90) at 13 heart transplant centers in the U.S. between 2019 and 2020. There was a total of 101 DCD donor hearts instrumented on OCS Heart technology, of those 90 were transplanted for an overall DCD hearts utilization rate of 89% (90/101). Donors and Recipients' demographics and risk factors were similar between the two arms except for age (donors- DCD 29.3 ± 7.5 vs Control 33.2 ± 11.4) (recipients- DCD-OCS 51.3 ± 12.6 vs Control-DBD 55.0 ± 11.4 p=0.041). Patient survival at 6 months was DCD 94.4% vs Control 88.6% p<0.0001, and graft survival at 6 months was DCD 98.9% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Patient survival at 1 year was DCD 93.3% vs Control 87.3%, and graft survival at 1 year was DCD 97.7% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Safety endpoint was similar between both trial arms DCD 0.2 HGRSAE per patient vs Control 0.1 HGRSAE per patient. Incidence of moderate or severe ISHLT PGD was 20% in DCD arm vs. 9.1% in Control arm. Incidence of primary graft failure was 0% in the DCD arm vs 2.2% in Control. The OCS DCD Heart trial was the first ever randomized trial comparing DCD heart transplant to DBD standard criteria heart transplant clinical outcomes. The trial demonstrated that the use of OCS Heart resulted in high rate of DCD heart utilization for transplantation with excellent patient and graft survival outcomes compared to DBD donor hearts. These results support the increased use of DCD hearts for transplantation to expand the pool of donor hearts for transplantation.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Patient & Graft Survival.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大男完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
1分钟前
阳光强炫发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
shhoing应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
shhoing应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
锦城纯契完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
HuanChen完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
阳光强炫关注了科研通微信公众号
2分钟前
否定之否定发布了新的文献求助200
2分钟前
shi hui应助白华苍松采纳,获得10
4分钟前
shhoing应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
shhoing应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
慕青应助calmxp采纳,获得10
5分钟前
6分钟前
calmxp发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
白华苍松完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
7分钟前
sakura发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
7分钟前
pinklay完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
poki完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
wwee发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
天天快乐应助wwee采纳,获得10
8分钟前
小橙子发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
sakura完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
笔墨留香完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
shhoing应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9分钟前
ZZZ完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
锅架了完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
10分钟前
大个应助小橙子采纳,获得10
10分钟前
11分钟前
婼汐完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
12分钟前
12分钟前
12分钟前
sdshi发布了新的文献求助10
12分钟前
12分钟前
江洋大盗发布了新的文献求助10
12分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1601
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 800
Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 21. Morphology I. The Skull and Appendicular Locomotor Apparatus of Lepidosauria 620
A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 3rd Edition 500
Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed 500
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5558577
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4643645
关于积分的说明 14671323
捐赠科研通 4584948
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2515270
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1489325
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1460038