Expanding Heart Transplants from Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD) - Results of the First Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Organ Care System (OCS™) Heart - (OCS DCD Heart Trial)

医学 循环系统 随机对照试验 心脏移植 心脏病学 重症监护医学 内科学 心力衰竭
作者
Jacob N. Schroder,A. Shah,Victor Pretorius,J.W. Smith,Mani A. Daneshmand,Arnar Geirsson,Si M. Pham,J. Um,Scott C. Silvestry,Andrew Shaffer,Karol Mudy,Masashi Kai,David L. Joyce,Jonathan M. Philpott,Koji Takeda,Daniel Goldstein,Yasuhiro Shudo,G.S. Couper,H. Mallidi,F. Esmailian,D. Pham,Christopher T. Salerno,Lucian Lozonschi,Mohammed Quader,Chetan B. Patel,Adam D. DeVore,Benjamin S. Bryner,Joren C. Madsen,Tarek Absi,C. Milano,Donna M. D’Alessandro
出处
期刊:Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:41 (4): S72-S72 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.165
摘要

Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of the OCS Heart technology to resuscitate, preserve and assess DCD hearts for transplantation. Methods OCS DCD Heart Trial included the following donor inclusion criteria: Maastricht Category III DCD donor, donor age 18-49 years old, warm ischemic time (WIT) ≤30 mins. Donor exclusions: Previous history of cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction, terminal EF of ≤50%, or significant valve disease. Recipient inclusion criteria: primary adult heart transplant candidates. Recipient exclusion: multi-organ transplant candidates, history of prior solid organ or bone marrow transplants, history of chronic renal failure, or unrandomized recipients. Candidates were randomized 3:1 into two groups: DCD Heart Possible (DCD) or DBD cold stored hearts (Control). The trial protocol final analysis was prespecified to compare the post-transplant outcome from recipients of DCD hearts preserved on OCS (DCD) to all those who received DBD hearts preserved with cold storage (DBD Control). Endpoints Patient survival at 6- and 12-months post-transplantation. Other endpoints included; OCS DCD hearts utilization rate defined as the number of DCD hearts transplanted after OCS perfusion divided by the total number of eligible DCD donor hearts that were instrumented on OCS, incidence of severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD. Safety endpoint was defined as the incidence of Heart Graft-related Serious Adverse Events (HGRSAEs) in the first 30 days post-transplant defined as moderate or severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD, or primary graft failure requiring re-transplantation. Results A total of 180 patients were randomized and transplanted in the trial (DCD-OCS n=90 and Control-DBD n=90) at 13 heart transplant centers in the U.S. between 2019 and 2020. There was a total of 101 DCD donor hearts instrumented on OCS Heart technology, of those 90 were transplanted for an overall DCD hearts utilization rate of 89% (90/101). Donors and Recipients' demographics and risk factors were similar between the two arms except for age (donors- DCD 29.3 ± 7.5 vs Control 33.2 ± 11.4) (recipients- DCD-OCS 51.3 ± 12.6 vs Control-DBD 55.0 ± 11.4 p=0.041). Patient survival at 6 months was DCD 94.4% vs Control 88.6% p<0.0001, and graft survival at 6 months was DCD 98.9% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Patient survival at 1 year was DCD 93.3% vs Control 87.3%, and graft survival at 1 year was DCD 97.7% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Safety endpoint was similar between both trial arms DCD 0.2 HGRSAE per patient vs Control 0.1 HGRSAE per patient. Incidence of moderate or severe ISHLT PGD was 20% in DCD arm vs. 9.1% in Control arm. Incidence of primary graft failure was 0% in the DCD arm vs 2.2% in Control. Conclusion The OCS DCD Heart trial was the first ever randomized trial comparing DCD heart transplant to DBD standard criteria heart transplant clinical outcomes. The trial demonstrated that the use of OCS Heart resulted in high rate of DCD heart utilization for transplantation with excellent patient and graft survival outcomes compared to DBD donor hearts. These results support the increased use of DCD hearts for transplantation to expand the pool of donor hearts for transplantation.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Patient & Graft Survival. To evaluate the effectiveness of the OCS Heart technology to resuscitate, preserve and assess DCD hearts for transplantation. OCS DCD Heart Trial included the following donor inclusion criteria: Maastricht Category III DCD donor, donor age 18-49 years old, warm ischemic time (WIT) ≤30 mins. Donor exclusions: Previous history of cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction, terminal EF of ≤50%, or significant valve disease. Recipient inclusion criteria: primary adult heart transplant candidates. Recipient exclusion: multi-organ transplant candidates, history of prior solid organ or bone marrow transplants, history of chronic renal failure, or unrandomized recipients. Candidates were randomized 3:1 into two groups: DCD Heart Possible (DCD) or DBD cold stored hearts (Control). The trial protocol final analysis was prespecified to compare the post-transplant outcome from recipients of DCD hearts preserved on OCS (DCD) to all those who received DBD hearts preserved with cold storage (DBD Control). Patient survival at 6- and 12-months post-transplantation. Other endpoints included; OCS DCD hearts utilization rate defined as the number of DCD hearts transplanted after OCS perfusion divided by the total number of eligible DCD donor hearts that were instrumented on OCS, incidence of severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD. Safety endpoint was defined as the incidence of Heart Graft-related Serious Adverse Events (HGRSAEs) in the first 30 days post-transplant defined as moderate or severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD, or primary graft failure requiring re-transplantation. A total of 180 patients were randomized and transplanted in the trial (DCD-OCS n=90 and Control-DBD n=90) at 13 heart transplant centers in the U.S. between 2019 and 2020. There was a total of 101 DCD donor hearts instrumented on OCS Heart technology, of those 90 were transplanted for an overall DCD hearts utilization rate of 89% (90/101). Donors and Recipients' demographics and risk factors were similar between the two arms except for age (donors- DCD 29.3 ± 7.5 vs Control 33.2 ± 11.4) (recipients- DCD-OCS 51.3 ± 12.6 vs Control-DBD 55.0 ± 11.4 p=0.041). Patient survival at 6 months was DCD 94.4% vs Control 88.6% p<0.0001, and graft survival at 6 months was DCD 98.9% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Patient survival at 1 year was DCD 93.3% vs Control 87.3%, and graft survival at 1 year was DCD 97.7% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Safety endpoint was similar between both trial arms DCD 0.2 HGRSAE per patient vs Control 0.1 HGRSAE per patient. Incidence of moderate or severe ISHLT PGD was 20% in DCD arm vs. 9.1% in Control arm. Incidence of primary graft failure was 0% in the DCD arm vs 2.2% in Control. The OCS DCD Heart trial was the first ever randomized trial comparing DCD heart transplant to DBD standard criteria heart transplant clinical outcomes. The trial demonstrated that the use of OCS Heart resulted in high rate of DCD heart utilization for transplantation with excellent patient and graft survival outcomes compared to DBD donor hearts. These results support the increased use of DCD hearts for transplantation to expand the pool of donor hearts for transplantation.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Patient & Graft Survival.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LinJunhong发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
pink发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
牛牛完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
4秒前
an12138发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
pkpkq发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
小蘑菇应助zhangshu采纳,获得10
5秒前
dd完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
rubbertail完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
fan发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
在水一方应助小猪采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
清脆代桃完成签到 ,获得积分0
15秒前
阳光的紊应助jiangru采纳,获得30
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
Wjc完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
斯文败类应助神奇海螺采纳,获得10
17秒前
Kyros完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
Nikko发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
两脚书橱的逃亡完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
789发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
小叙完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
俭朴新瑶发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
赘婿应助小程同学采纳,获得10
22秒前
one完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
24秒前
田様应助yangzai采纳,获得10
24秒前
XX发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
海的呼唤发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
進擊的巨人完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
高分求助中
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (Sixth Edition) 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
Christian Women in Chinese Society: The Anglican Story 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3961083
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3507362
关于积分的说明 11135622
捐赠科研通 3239835
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1790434
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 872400
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 803150