Uplift history of the Central and Northern Andes: A review

Research Article| July 01, 2000 Uplift history of the Central and Northern Andes: A review Kathryn M. Gregory-Wodzicki Kathryn M. Gregory-Wodzicki 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964-8000, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Kathryn M. Gregory-Wodzicki 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964-8000, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 25 Sep 1998 Revision Received: 18 Nov 1999 Accepted: 22 Nov 1999 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2000) 112 (7): 1091–1105. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<1091:UHOTCA>2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 25 Sep 1998 Revision Received: 18 Nov 1999 Accepted: 22 Nov 1999 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Kathryn M. Gregory-Wodzicki; Uplift history of the Central and Northern Andes: A review. GSA Bulletin 2000;; 112 (7): 1091–1105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<1091:UHOTCA>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract The elevation of the Andean Cordillera is a crucial boundary condition for both climatic and tectonic studies. The Andes affect climate because they form the only barrier to atmospheric circulation in the Southern Hemisphere, and they intrigue geologists because they have the highest plateau on Earth formed at a noncollisional plate margin, the Altiplano-Puna. Yet, until recently, few quantitative studies of their uplift history existed. This study presents both (1) a review of the quantitative paleoelevation estimates that have been made for the Central and Colombian Andes and (2) an examination of the source and magnitude of error for each estimate. In the Central Andes, paleobotanical evidence suggests that the Altiplano-Puna had attained no more than a third of its modern elevation of 3700 m by 20 Ma and no more than half its modern elevation by 10.7 Ma. These data imply surface uplift on the order of 2300–3400 m since the late Miocene at uplift rates of 0.2–0.3 mm/yr. Paleobotanical and geomorphological data suggest a similar uplift history for the Eastern Cordillera—namely no more than half the modern elevation present by 10 Ma. No evidence exists for an exponential increase in uplift rate, as has been interpreted from fission-track data. These uplift rates mostly reflect mean surface uplift rather than rock uplift—that is, uplift of material points—because little dissection of the western Eastern Cordillera has occurred south of lat 19°S and of the Altiplano-Puna. Thus, the Central Andean Plateau appears to be young. In the Colombian Andes, paleobotanical data imply rapid uplift of the Eastern Cordillera between 2 and 5 Ma at rates on the order of 0.6–3 mm/yr. However, some of this uplift is likely rock uplift due to erosion-driven isostatic rebound rather than mean surface uplift. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.