Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and ESRD Receiving Dialysis: A 54-Week Randomized Trial

医学 磷酸西他列汀 格列吡嗪 2型糖尿病 耐受性 低血糖 内科学 磷酸西他列汀 临床终点 糖尿病 透析 肾脏疾病 终末期肾病 随机对照试验 不利影响 血液透析 内分泌学 胰岛素
作者
Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira,Dalila B. Corry,Carl Erik Mogensen,Lance Sloan,Xu Liu,Gregory T. Golm,Edward J. Gonzalez,Michael J. Davies,Keith D. Kaufman,Barry J. Goldstein
出处
期刊:American Journal of Kidney Diseases [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:61 (4): 579-587 被引量:110
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.11.043
摘要

Background Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. Study Design 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. Setting & Participants From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Intervention Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Outcomes Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Results Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was −0.72% (95% CI, −0.95% to −0.48%) with sitagliptin and −0.87% (95% CI, −1.11% to −0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, −0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, −7.8% [95% CI, −17.1% to −1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Limitations Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Conclusions Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis. Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was −0.72% (95% CI, −0.95% to −0.48%) with sitagliptin and −0.87% (95% CI, −1.11% to −0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, −0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, −7.8% [95% CI, −17.1% to −1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
无糖气泡水完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
lucky发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
罗山柳完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
合适水杯完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
haha发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
善学以致用应助刘果果采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
儒雅致远发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
可爱的函函应助朴实山兰采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
九五七a发布了新的文献求助200
1秒前
pipishi完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
旅程发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
阿欣完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
YY发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
怕孤单的丁真完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
yx_cheng应助sunsold采纳,获得30
3秒前
huangninghuang完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
鱼跃完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
研友_nvGWwZ发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
鳗鱼盼夏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
九月完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
彭于晏应助烩面大师采纳,获得10
6秒前
能干的cen完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
英俊的铭应助fs采纳,获得10
6秒前
丘比特应助fs采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
可以发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI2S应助beikou采纳,获得10
7秒前
可爱丸子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Ma完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Owen应助Robe采纳,获得10
9秒前
Wang发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
所所应助简单幸福采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 330
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3986722
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3529207
关于积分的说明 11243810
捐赠科研通 3267638
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1803822
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 881207
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 808582