Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and ESRD Receiving Dialysis: A 54-Week Randomized Trial

医学 磷酸西他列汀 格列吡嗪 2型糖尿病 耐受性 低血糖 内科学 磷酸西他列汀 临床终点 糖尿病 透析 肾脏疾病 终末期肾病 随机对照试验 不利影响 血液透析 内分泌学 胰岛素
作者
Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira,Dalila B. Corry,Carl Erik Mogensen,Lance Sloan,Xu Liu,Gregory T. Golm,Edward J. Gonzalez,Michael J. Davies,Keith D. Kaufman,Barry J. Goldstein
出处
期刊:American Journal of Kidney Diseases [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:61 (4): 579-587 被引量:110
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.11.043
摘要

Background Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. Study Design 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. Setting & Participants From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Intervention Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Outcomes Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Results Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was −0.72% (95% CI, −0.95% to −0.48%) with sitagliptin and −0.87% (95% CI, −1.11% to −0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, −0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, −7.8% [95% CI, −17.1% to −1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Limitations Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Conclusions Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis. Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was −0.72% (95% CI, −0.95% to −0.48%) with sitagliptin and −0.87% (95% CI, −1.11% to −0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, −0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, −7.8% [95% CI, −17.1% to −1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
jxxx发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
万能图书馆应助大晨采纳,获得10
1秒前
卷卷完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Afterlife34发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
乐乐应助Levi采纳,获得30
2秒前
Duocean发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
lala完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
xuyan发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
aajhajkahna应助sukiii采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.2应助Euplectella采纳,获得10
5秒前
comeongong发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Guo99完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
曦麟发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
隐形的雪冥完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
ocer007应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
上官若男应助落后醉易采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
云天河应助梧桐雨210采纳,获得50
7秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.4应助嗑盐66采纳,获得10
8秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7756286
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9302641
关于积分的说明 20270606
捐赠科研通 7339502
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3311482
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462355
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2324928