Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and ESRD Receiving Dialysis: A 54-Week Randomized Trial

医学 磷酸西他列汀 格列吡嗪 2型糖尿病 耐受性 低血糖 内科学 磷酸西他列汀 临床终点 糖尿病 透析 肾脏疾病 终末期肾病 随机对照试验 不利影响 血液透析 内分泌学 胰岛素
作者
Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira,Dalila B. Corry,Carl Erik Mogensen,Lance Sloan,Xu Liu,Gregory T. Golm,Edward J. Gonzalez,Michael J. Davies,Keith D. Kaufman,Barry J. Goldstein
出处
期刊:American Journal of Kidney Diseases [Elsevier]
卷期号:61 (4): 579-587 被引量:110
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.11.043
摘要

Background Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. Study Design 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. Setting & Participants From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Intervention Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Outcomes Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Results Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was −0.72% (95% CI, −0.95% to −0.48%) with sitagliptin and −0.87% (95% CI, −1.11% to −0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, −0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, −7.8% [95% CI, −17.1% to −1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Limitations Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Conclusions Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis. Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was −0.72% (95% CI, −0.95% to −0.48%) with sitagliptin and −0.87% (95% CI, −1.11% to −0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, −0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, −7.8% [95% CI, −17.1% to −1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
祁代芙发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
1234发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
醋醋发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
4秒前
曾经可乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Ava应助xiaoyi采纳,获得10
4秒前
Chuyu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
sikaixue发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
大模型应助王娟采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
Lucky完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
尊敬浩宇发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
不爱吃韭菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
pangolin完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
12秒前
bridge发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
图南发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
汤姆凯特完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
欢呼凡雁发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
乐乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
李健的小迷弟应助佳期采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
大个应助刘小博采纳,获得10
17秒前
翟傲白发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
NONO发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
SciGPT应助爱大美采纳,获得10
20秒前
22秒前
OCDer发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
hhmm00完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
yangziwei完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
歯科矯正学 第7版(或第5版) 1004
Semiconductor Process Reliability in Practice 1000
Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential (第二版) 1000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 600
GROUP-THEORY AND POLARIZATION ALGEBRA 500
Mesopotamian divination texts : conversing with the gods : sources from the first millennium BCE 500
Days of Transition. The Parsi Death Rituals(2011) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3234117
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2880509
关于积分的说明 8215804
捐赠科研通 2548076
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1377485
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 647924
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 623263