A Markov cost-utility analysis of escitalopram and duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder

依西酞普兰 度洛西汀 医学 盐酸度洛西汀 重性抑郁障碍 文拉法辛 生活质量(医疗保健) 置信区间 精神科 内科学 抗抑郁药 心情 焦虑 替代医学 护理部 病理
作者
Edward P. Armstrong,Daniel C. Malone,M. Haim Erder
出处
期刊:Current Medical Research and Opinion [Informa]
卷期号:24 (4): 1115-1121 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1185/030079908x273309
摘要

ABSTRACTObjective: To estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life weeks of duloxetine and escitalopram.Research design: A probabilistic Markov cost-utility analysis with a time horizon of 1 year using data from placebo controlled randomized clinical trials for both products.Methods: Efficacy was defined as remission of depressive symptoms and converted to utilities. Side effects were incorporated using rates from clinical trials and converted to utilities to define treatment effective­ness. The effectiveness outcome was quality adjusted life weeks (QALWs). Estimates of effectiveness (efficacy and side effects) used beta distributions and costs used gamma distributions. Using a managed care perspective, medication costs and physician office visits were included in the model, along with costs associated with treatment failure. Antidepressant costs were obtained using average wholesale price minus 20%. Physician visit costs were obtained from the 2006 US Medicare fee schedule for physician services. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted using 1000 trials with both first- and second-order sampling.Results: Over 1 year, the estimated mean quality-adjusted life weeks was 41.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.7–41.3) for escitalopram and 38.2 (95% CI: 37.9–38.4) for duloxetine. The mean annual total medical cost for escitalopram was $907 (95% CI: $894–$919) and $1633 (95% CI: $1614–$1654) for duloxetine. Limitations to this analysis include using separate studies examining the efficacy and adverse events of either escitalopram or duloxetine, assuming the switch, augmentation, and titration rates for duloxetine to be similar to escitalopram, and using utility estimates from published literature for the antidepressant adverse events.Conclusion: This analysis suggests that escitalopram was more effective in terms of QALWs and less costly than duloxetine for treatment of depression. Key words: : Cost-utilityDepressionDuloxetineEscitalopramPharmacoeconomics

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
赵云完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
禾袅完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
Owen应助饱满的半青采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
无限水杯完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
安静的天思完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
cjq发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
accept完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
希文完成签到,获得积分0
6秒前
6秒前
mookie发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
丘比特应助Mxaxxxx采纳,获得10
7秒前
禾袅发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
cofield完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
hh发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科研dog完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ever完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
姜晓枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
研友_Zl1ND8发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
紫露草完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
orixero应助秃驴采纳,获得10
11秒前
Bin_Liu发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
酷波er应助昏睡的箴采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
情怀应助zero采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
乐乐应助悠悠采纳,获得10
15秒前
百分之五十一完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
log完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
霍宇哲完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
Mxaxxxx发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
彭于晏应助wwww采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
Brittle Fracture in Welded Ships 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5945045
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7096716
关于积分的说明 15898200
捐赠科研通 5077005
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2730266
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1690128
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1614534