A Markov cost-utility analysis of escitalopram and duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder

依西酞普兰 度洛西汀 医学 盐酸度洛西汀 重性抑郁障碍 文拉法辛 生活质量(医疗保健) 置信区间 精神科 内科学 抗抑郁药 心情 病理 护理部 替代医学 焦虑
作者
Edward P. Armstrong,Daniel C. Malone,M. Haim Erder
出处
期刊:Current Medical Research and Opinion [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:24 (4): 1115-1121 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1185/030079908x273309
摘要

ABSTRACTObjective: To estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life weeks of duloxetine and escitalopram.Research design: A probabilistic Markov cost-utility analysis with a time horizon of 1 year using data from placebo controlled randomized clinical trials for both products.Methods: Efficacy was defined as remission of depressive symptoms and converted to utilities. Side effects were incorporated using rates from clinical trials and converted to utilities to define treatment effective­ness. The effectiveness outcome was quality adjusted life weeks (QALWs). Estimates of effectiveness (efficacy and side effects) used beta distributions and costs used gamma distributions. Using a managed care perspective, medication costs and physician office visits were included in the model, along with costs associated with treatment failure. Antidepressant costs were obtained using average wholesale price minus 20%. Physician visit costs were obtained from the 2006 US Medicare fee schedule for physician services. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted using 1000 trials with both first- and second-order sampling.Results: Over 1 year, the estimated mean quality-adjusted life weeks was 41.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.7–41.3) for escitalopram and 38.2 (95% CI: 37.9–38.4) for duloxetine. The mean annual total medical cost for escitalopram was $907 (95% CI: $894–$919) and $1633 (95% CI: $1614–$1654) for duloxetine. Limitations to this analysis include using separate studies examining the efficacy and adverse events of either escitalopram or duloxetine, assuming the switch, augmentation, and titration rates for duloxetine to be similar to escitalopram, and using utility estimates from published literature for the antidepressant adverse events.Conclusion: This analysis suggests that escitalopram was more effective in terms of QALWs and less costly than duloxetine for treatment of depression. Key words: : Cost-utilityDepressionDuloxetineEscitalopramPharmacoeconomics
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
YouD发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
魏伯安发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Leon完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Xieyusen发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
5秒前
李健应助8秒记忆的鱼儿采纳,获得10
5秒前
魏伯安完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
9秒前
Newt应助小火车采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
feige发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
16秒前
17秒前
英姑应助慧子采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
欧阳正义发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
啦啦啦123完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
log发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
Miss-Li发布了新的文献求助20
23秒前
汉堡包应助zhan采纳,获得20
23秒前
23秒前
我是老大应助feige采纳,获得10
23秒前
万能图书馆应助黑冰A采纳,获得10
24秒前
Shueason完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
zz发布了新的文献求助20
29秒前
syqlyd完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
思源应助黄晓旭采纳,获得10
32秒前
梨花酒完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
sun发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
34秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
34秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
34秒前
Liufgui应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
34秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
34秒前
Liufgui应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
34秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
34秒前
OKOK应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
34秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
34秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 600
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3967386
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3512667
关于积分的说明 11164479
捐赠科研通 3247536
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1793911
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874758
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804498