A Markov cost-utility analysis of escitalopram and duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder

依西酞普兰 度洛西汀 医学 盐酸度洛西汀 重性抑郁障碍 文拉法辛 生活质量(医疗保健) 置信区间 精神科 内科学 抗抑郁药 心情 焦虑 替代医学 护理部 病理
作者
Edward P. Armstrong,Daniel C. Malone,M. Haim Erder
出处
期刊:Current Medical Research and Opinion [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:24 (4): 1115-1121 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1185/030079908x273309
摘要

ABSTRACTObjective: To estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life weeks of duloxetine and escitalopram.Research design: A probabilistic Markov cost-utility analysis with a time horizon of 1 year using data from placebo controlled randomized clinical trials for both products.Methods: Efficacy was defined as remission of depressive symptoms and converted to utilities. Side effects were incorporated using rates from clinical trials and converted to utilities to define treatment effective­ness. The effectiveness outcome was quality adjusted life weeks (QALWs). Estimates of effectiveness (efficacy and side effects) used beta distributions and costs used gamma distributions. Using a managed care perspective, medication costs and physician office visits were included in the model, along with costs associated with treatment failure. Antidepressant costs were obtained using average wholesale price minus 20%. Physician visit costs were obtained from the 2006 US Medicare fee schedule for physician services. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted using 1000 trials with both first- and second-order sampling.Results: Over 1 year, the estimated mean quality-adjusted life weeks was 41.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.7–41.3) for escitalopram and 38.2 (95% CI: 37.9–38.4) for duloxetine. The mean annual total medical cost for escitalopram was $907 (95% CI: $894–$919) and $1633 (95% CI: $1614–$1654) for duloxetine. Limitations to this analysis include using separate studies examining the efficacy and adverse events of either escitalopram or duloxetine, assuming the switch, augmentation, and titration rates for duloxetine to be similar to escitalopram, and using utility estimates from published literature for the antidepressant adverse events.Conclusion: This analysis suggests that escitalopram was more effective in terms of QALWs and less costly than duloxetine for treatment of depression. Key words: : Cost-utilityDepressionDuloxetineEscitalopramPharmacoeconomics
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
夏定海完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
滚去学习完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
yyljc完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
怡然的梦之完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
幻灭完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
嗯呐完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
qinshimigyue发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
科研通AI6.1应助achenghn采纳,获得10
5秒前
12243243发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
大个应助七濑采纳,获得10
6秒前
墨非墨完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
小吴发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
8秒前
mddy完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
荒谬发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
csq69发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
CHN发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
多情友灵发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
yanhang完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
共享精神应助fall采纳,获得10
13秒前
BESTZJ发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
15秒前
聪明短靴发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
余沛行发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
qinshimigyue完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
小吴完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
20秒前
ding应助於傲松采纳,获得10
20秒前
七濑发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
Rui完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
Various Faces of Animal Metaphor in English and Polish 800
An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 第六版习题答案 600
Cleopatra : A Reference Guide to Her Life and Works 500
Fundamentals of Strain Psychology 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6341435
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8156740
关于积分的说明 17144190
捐赠科研通 5397717
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2859314
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1837255
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1687262