A Markov cost-utility analysis of escitalopram and duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder

依西酞普兰 度洛西汀 医学 盐酸度洛西汀 重性抑郁障碍 文拉法辛 生活质量(医疗保健) 置信区间 精神科 内科学 抗抑郁药 心情 焦虑 替代医学 护理部 病理
作者
Edward P. Armstrong,Daniel C. Malone,M. Haim Erder
出处
期刊:Current Medical Research and Opinion [Informa]
卷期号:24 (4): 1115-1121 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1185/030079908x273309
摘要

ABSTRACTObjective: To estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life weeks of duloxetine and escitalopram.Research design: A probabilistic Markov cost-utility analysis with a time horizon of 1 year using data from placebo controlled randomized clinical trials for both products.Methods: Efficacy was defined as remission of depressive symptoms and converted to utilities. Side effects were incorporated using rates from clinical trials and converted to utilities to define treatment effective­ness. The effectiveness outcome was quality adjusted life weeks (QALWs). Estimates of effectiveness (efficacy and side effects) used beta distributions and costs used gamma distributions. Using a managed care perspective, medication costs and physician office visits were included in the model, along with costs associated with treatment failure. Antidepressant costs were obtained using average wholesale price minus 20%. Physician visit costs were obtained from the 2006 US Medicare fee schedule for physician services. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted using 1000 trials with both first- and second-order sampling.Results: Over 1 year, the estimated mean quality-adjusted life weeks was 41.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.7–41.3) for escitalopram and 38.2 (95% CI: 37.9–38.4) for duloxetine. The mean annual total medical cost for escitalopram was $907 (95% CI: $894–$919) and $1633 (95% CI: $1614–$1654) for duloxetine. Limitations to this analysis include using separate studies examining the efficacy and adverse events of either escitalopram or duloxetine, assuming the switch, augmentation, and titration rates for duloxetine to be similar to escitalopram, and using utility estimates from published literature for the antidepressant adverse events.Conclusion: This analysis suggests that escitalopram was more effective in terms of QALWs and less costly than duloxetine for treatment of depression. Key words: : Cost-utilityDepressionDuloxetineEscitalopramPharmacoeconomics

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
2秒前
3秒前
研友_Z7myRL发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
XIAOWANG发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
chenzheng完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Echo应助野心家采纳,获得10
8秒前
明明发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
荆展鹏发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
orixero应助内向晓蓝采纳,获得30
10秒前
hana发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Z100发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Re完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
qq发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
三川故里完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
Minions发布了新的文献求助50
13秒前
紫梦发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
科目三应助Holly采纳,获得10
14秒前
勤奋酒窝完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
naturehome发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
复成完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
上官若男应助XIAOWANG采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
唐唐应助孤独的根号三采纳,获得10
20秒前
周一应助幸福遥采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
学术小天才完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
老妖发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
科研通AI6.1应助阿扎尔采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
VASCULITIS(血管炎)Rheumatic Disease Clinics (Clinics Review Articles) —— 《风湿病临床》(临床综述文章) 1000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Digital and Social Media Marketing 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5977450
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7338065
关于积分的说明 16010164
捐赠科研通 5116845
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2746683
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1715088
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1623852