A Markov cost-utility analysis of escitalopram and duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder

依西酞普兰 度洛西汀 医学 盐酸度洛西汀 重性抑郁障碍 文拉法辛 生活质量(医疗保健) 置信区间 精神科 内科学 抗抑郁药 心情 焦虑 替代医学 护理部 病理
作者
Edward P. Armstrong,Daniel C. Malone,M. Haim Erder
出处
期刊:Current Medical Research and Opinion [Informa]
卷期号:24 (4): 1115-1121 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1185/030079908x273309
摘要

ABSTRACTObjective: To estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life weeks of duloxetine and escitalopram.Research design: A probabilistic Markov cost-utility analysis with a time horizon of 1 year using data from placebo controlled randomized clinical trials for both products.Methods: Efficacy was defined as remission of depressive symptoms and converted to utilities. Side effects were incorporated using rates from clinical trials and converted to utilities to define treatment effective­ness. The effectiveness outcome was quality adjusted life weeks (QALWs). Estimates of effectiveness (efficacy and side effects) used beta distributions and costs used gamma distributions. Using a managed care perspective, medication costs and physician office visits were included in the model, along with costs associated with treatment failure. Antidepressant costs were obtained using average wholesale price minus 20%. Physician visit costs were obtained from the 2006 US Medicare fee schedule for physician services. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted using 1000 trials with both first- and second-order sampling.Results: Over 1 year, the estimated mean quality-adjusted life weeks was 41.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.7–41.3) for escitalopram and 38.2 (95% CI: 37.9–38.4) for duloxetine. The mean annual total medical cost for escitalopram was $907 (95% CI: $894–$919) and $1633 (95% CI: $1614–$1654) for duloxetine. Limitations to this analysis include using separate studies examining the efficacy and adverse events of either escitalopram or duloxetine, assuming the switch, augmentation, and titration rates for duloxetine to be similar to escitalopram, and using utility estimates from published literature for the antidepressant adverse events.Conclusion: This analysis suggests that escitalopram was more effective in terms of QALWs and less costly than duloxetine for treatment of depression. Key words: : Cost-utilityDepressionDuloxetineEscitalopramPharmacoeconomics
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
许多知识完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
缓慢的战斗机完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
圣晟胜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
科研通AI5应助nextconnie采纳,获得10
2秒前
陈朝旧迹完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
无花果应助虚心海燕采纳,获得10
3秒前
sun发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
4秒前
KBYer完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
FashionBoy应助阳阳采纳,获得10
4秒前
许多知识发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
苏源智完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Andy完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
明理晓霜发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
ZHANGMANLI0422关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
M先生发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
FashionBoy应助许多知识采纳,获得10
11秒前
Poyd完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
故意的傲玉应助tao_blue采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
kid1912完成签到,获得积分0
15秒前
小马甲应助一网小海蜇采纳,获得10
18秒前
专一的笑阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
xuesensu完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
豌豆完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
M先生完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
26秒前
科研通AI5应助sun采纳,获得10
26秒前
shitzu完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
choco发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
李健的小迷弟应助sun采纳,获得10
30秒前
Jzhang应助liyuchen采纳,获得10
30秒前
魏伯安发布了新的文献求助30
30秒前
jjjjjj发布了新的文献求助30
32秒前
33秒前
伯赏诗霜发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
糟糕的鹏飞完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527998
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108225
关于积分的说明 9288086
捐赠科研通 2805889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540195
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716950
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709849