Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making

启发式 认知偏差 认知 奇纳 心理信息 分类 心理学 代表性启发 梅德林 答辩人 启发式 人口 计算机科学 医学 社会心理学 人工智能 精神科 心理干预 环境卫生 政治学 法学 操作系统
作者
J. S. Blumenthal‐Barby,Heather Krieger
出处
期刊:Medical Decision Making [SAGE]
卷期号:35 (4): 539-557 被引量:447
标识
DOI:10.1177/0272989x14547740
摘要

Background. The role of cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making is of growing interest. The purpose of this study was to determine whether studies on cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making are based on actual or hypothetical decisions and are conducted with populations that are representative of those who typically make the medical decision; to categorize the types of cognitive biases and heuristics found and whether they are found in patients or in medical personnel; and to critically review the studies based on standard methodological quality criteria. Method. Data sources were original, peer-reviewed, empirical studies on cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making found in Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, and the CINAHL databases published in 1980–2013. Predefined exclusion criteria were used to identify 213 studies. During data extraction, information was collected on type of bias or heuristic studied, respondent population, decision type, study type (actual or hypothetical), study method, and study conclusion. Results. Of the 213 studies analyzed, 164 (77%) were based on hypothetical vignettes, and 175 (82%) were conducted with representative populations. Nineteen types of cognitive biases and heuristics were found. Only 34% of studies ( n = 73) investigated medical personnel, and 68% ( n = 145) confirmed the presence of a bias or heuristic. Each methodological quality criterion was satisfied by more than 50% of the studies, except for sample size and validated instruments/questions. Limitations are that existing terms were used to inform search terms, and study inclusion criteria focused strictly on decision making. Conclusions. Most of the studies on biases and heuristics in medical decision making are based on hypothetical vignettes, raising concerns about applicability of these findings to actual decision making. Biases and heuristics have been underinvestigated in medical personnel compared with patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
云野完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
劲秉应助crk采纳,获得10
6秒前
14秒前
22秒前
科研通AI2S应助caster1采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
Howie发布了新的文献求助60
28秒前
活泼莫英发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
28秒前
29秒前
小蘑菇应助慕冰蝶采纳,获得10
29秒前
30秒前
鲨鱼辣椒完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
田様应助追寻的身影采纳,获得20
31秒前
31秒前
32秒前
李大白完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
廉紫真发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
简单发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
Dr.Liujun发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
36秒前
无名老大应助清秀的天德采纳,获得10
39秒前
W_Jnf应助润润润采纳,获得10
40秒前
gggghhhh发布了新的文献求助30
42秒前
喜悦的白羊完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
ybheqiang123456完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
chen应助廉紫真采纳,获得10
44秒前
Dr.Liujun完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
八巷发布了新的文献求助60
50秒前
50秒前
开心不评完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
mashibeo发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
56秒前
58秒前
豚豚发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
搁浅发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
springu发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 1200
BIOLOGY OF NON-CHORDATES 1000
进口的时尚——14世纪东方丝绸与意大利艺术 Imported Fashion:Oriental Silks and Italian Arts in the 14th Century 800
Autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise: linear versus a velocity-based flexible model 550
Zeitschrift für Orient-Archäologie 500
The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3352334
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2977554
关于积分的说明 8679973
捐赠科研通 2658501
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1455839
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 674118
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 664654