Comparative Efficacy of Different Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats for Depression in Patients With Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

随机对照试验 荟萃分析 医学 奇纳 心理信息 认知行为疗法 梅德林 物理疗法 心理干预 内科学 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Lunhao Duan,Shu Zhang,Qianwen Yan,Xiaolin Hu
出处
期刊:Psycho-oncology [Wiley]
卷期号:34 (1) 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1002/pon.70078
摘要

ABSTRACT Background Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in improving depression in patients with cancer. However, diversity exists in the CBT delivery formats, and the optimal delivery format remains unconfirmed. Objectives To compare the efficacy of different delivery formats of CBT interventions on depression in patients with cancer. Design Network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Data Source Six databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PsycINFO, were searched from inception to May 30, 2024. Methods Two reviewers independently conducted study inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. A pairwise meta‐analysis and a network meta‐analysis were performed sequentially to determine the efficacy of CBT delivery formats for improving depression in patients with cancer. Results A total of 34 randomized controlled trials involving six delivery formats of CBT were included. Face‐to‐face group CBT (SMD = −0.88, 95% CI [−1.33, −0.44]), internet‐based individual CBT (SMD = −0.49, 95% CI [−0.92, −0.06]), app‐based individual CBT (SMD = −0.81, 95% CI [−1.45, −0.18]), and combined delivery formats of CBT for individual (SMD = −0.35, 95% CI [−0.62, −0.09]) were significantly more effective than the inactive control. The ranking probabilities revealed that face‐to‐face group CBT (P‐score = 0.86), app‐based individual CBT (P‐score = 0.74) and internet‐based individual CBT (P‐score = 0.57) were the three most effective delivery formats of CBT. Conclusions This study revealed the efficacy ranking of different CBT delivery formats in improving depression in patients with cancer. These findings are expected to provide evidence‐based support for future research and clinical decision making for improving depression in patients with cancer. Trial Registration PROSPERO (CRD42024553977)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
陈老太完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
土豪的灵竹完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
hongw_liu完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
zbearupz完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
不舍天真完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
qu发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
丰富的大地完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
追逐123完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
刘zx完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
魔幻高烽完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
LILI完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
jmy完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
FashionBoy应助韭黄采纳,获得10
10秒前
orangelion完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
想人陪的万言完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
丫丫完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
LO一一VE完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
ywindm完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
热心一一完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
芽衣完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
龙眼完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Maglev完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
戈惜发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
雨落瑾年完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
貅璐璐完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
豪豪完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
缘分完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
梓毅完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
冬雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3661181
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3222298
关于积分的说明 9744486
捐赠科研通 2931912
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1605300
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 757805
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734569