QUAIDE - Quality assessment of AI preclinical studies in diagnostic endoscopy

内窥镜检查 医学物理学 医学 质量评定 病理 外部质量评估 内科学
作者
Giulio Antonelli,Diogo Libânio,Albert J. de Groof,Fons van der Sommen,Pietro Mascagni,Pieter Sinonquel,Mohamed Abdelrahim,Omer F. Ahmad,Tyler M. Berzin,Pradeep Bhandari,Michael Bretthauer,Miguel Coimbra,Evelien Dekker,Alanna Ebigbo,Tom Eelbode,Leonardo Frazzoni,Seth A. Gross,Ryu Ishihara,Michał F. Kamiński,Helmut Messmann
出处
期刊:Gut [BMJ]
卷期号:74 (1): 153-161 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820
摘要

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy.The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted.Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1-14), present results (2. Results, statements 15-16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17-18).The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
花陵完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
Erin完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
英俊半仙发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
CipherSage应助绝顶高叟采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
无名完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
wanci应助qq采纳,获得10
5秒前
大模型应助Yuan采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
眯眯眼的鸽子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
sxpab完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
晓薇完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
tamaco发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
wzy发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
无极微光应助糖醋可乐采纳,获得20
9秒前
CXH应助海里的风采纳,获得20
9秒前
Rui完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
张某发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
辣椒发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
核桃发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
小半发布了新的文献求助50
12秒前
fuzhou完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
Epiphany_wts完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
刘可乐完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
kaxif发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
呆瓜不呆完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Applied Min-Max Approach to Missile Guidance and Control 3000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 800
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6316563
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8132634
关于积分的说明 17046384
捐赠科研通 5371892
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2851691
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1829616
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1681423