QUAIDE - Quality assessment of AI preclinical studies in diagnostic endoscopy

内窥镜检查 医学物理学 医学 质量评定 病理 外部质量评估 内科学
作者
Giulio Antonelli,Diogo Libânio,Albert J. de Groof,Fons van der Sommen,Pietro Mascagni,Pieter Sinonquel,Mohamed Abdelrahim,Omer F. Ahmad,Tyler M. Berzin,Pradeep Bhandari,Michael Bretthauer,Miguel Coimbra,Evelien Dekker,Alanna Ebigbo,Tom Eelbode,Leonardo Frazzoni,Seth A. Gross,Ryu Ishihara,Michał F. Kamiński,Helmut Messmann,Yuichi Mori,Nicolas Padoy,Sravanthi Parasa,Nastazja Pilonis,Francesco Renna,Alessandro Repici,Cem Şimşek,Marco Spadaccini,Raf Bisschops,Jacques Bergman,Cesare Hassan,Mário Dinis‐Ribeiro
出处
期刊:Gut [BMJ]
卷期号:74 (1): 153-161 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820
摘要

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy.The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted.Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1-14), present results (2. Results, statements 15-16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17-18).The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dldddz完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
二二二完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
动听导师发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
龙潜筱完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
明天过后完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
在水一方应助weddcf采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
沉默越彬完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Nicho发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
蓦然回首完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
Owen应助七大洋的风采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
科研通AI5应助一平采纳,获得80
4秒前
wxwang完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
廖同学完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
orixero应助李家乐采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
lujiajia发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
啊啊啊啊啊叶完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
LLL完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
sanyecao383完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Draeck完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
cruise完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
在水一方应助念念采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
万能图书馆应助动听导师采纳,获得10
9秒前
MADKAI发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科研通AI5应助蒋念寒采纳,获得10
10秒前
ric发布了新的文献求助200
10秒前
Li完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
min17完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
小黄发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527469
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107497
关于积分的说明 9285892
捐赠科研通 2805298
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539865
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716714
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709678