胃肠道出血
电子健康档案
便血
急诊科
接收机工作特性
医学
弗雷明翰风险评分
急诊医学
队列
急诊分诊台
曲线下面积
机器学习
结肠镜检查
计算机科学
内科学
医疗保健
结直肠癌
经济
疾病
癌症
精神科
经济增长
作者
Dennis Shung,Colleen Chan,Kisung You,Satoru Nakamura,Theo Saarinen,Neil S. Zheng,Michael Simonov,Darrick K. Li,Cynthia Tsay,Yuki I. Kawamura,Matthew Shen,Allen Hsiao,Jasjeet S. Sekhon,Loren Laine
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.06.030
摘要
Abstract
Background & Aims
Guidelines recommend use of risk stratification scores for patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) to identify very-low-risk patients eligible for discharge from emergency departments. Machine learning models may outperform existing scores and can be integrated within the electronic health record (EHR) to provide real-time risk assessment without manual data entry. We present the first EHR-based machine learning model for GIB. Methods
The training cohort comprised 2,546 patients and internal validation of 850 patients presenting with overt GIB (hematemesis, melena, hematochezia) to emergency departments of 2 hospitals from 2014-2019. External validation was performed on 926 patients presenting to a different hospital with the same EHR from 2014-2019. The primary outcome was a composite of red-blood-cell transfusion, hemostatic intervention (endoscopic, interventional radiologic, or surgical), and 30-day all-cause mortality. We used structured data fields in the EHR available within 4 hours of presentation and compared performance of machine learning models to current guideline-recommended risk scores, Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) and Oakland Score. Primary analysis was area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Secondary analysis was specificity at 99% sensitivity to assess proportion of patients correctly identified as very-low-risk. Results
The machine learning model outperformed the GBS (AUC=0.92 vs. 0.89;p<0.001) and Oakland score (AUC=0.92 vs. 0.89;p<0.001). At the very-low-risk threshold of 99% sensitivity, the machine learning model identified more very-low-risk patients: 37.9% vs. 18.5% for GBS and 11.7% for Oakland score (p<0.001 for both comparisons). Conclusions
An EHR-based machine learning model performs better than currently recommended clinical risk scores and identifies more very-low-risk patients eligible for discharge from the emergency department.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI