造谣
繁荣的
科学诚信
工程伦理学
职位(财务)
医学
生命伦理学
面子(社会学概念)
公共关系
医疗保健
立场文件
多样性(政治)
医学教育
政治学
社会学
心理学
社会科学
法学
社会化媒体
社会心理学
工程类
财务
病理
经济
作者
Lois Snyder Sulmasy,Joel R. Burnett,Jan Carney,Matthew DeCamp,Jan Carney,Alejandro Moreno-Calvo,Omar Atiq,Eileen Barrett,Éduardo Bruera,Angelique N. Collamer,Charlene M. Dewey,Kari L. Esbensen,Amy K. Holbrook,Diana Jung,Kyle E. Karches,Kenneth Prager,Ikaasa Suri,Erik A. Wallace
摘要
Respect for the scientific process and a diversity of views; open discourse and debate based on principles of ethics, best available evidence, and scientific inquiry and integrity; and an understanding of evidence gaps and uncertainty and how to communicate about them are important values in the advancement of science and the practice of medicine. Physicians often must make decisions about their recommendations to patients in the face of scarce or conflicting data. Are these characteristics of medicine and science widely understood and effectively communicated among members of the profession and to patients and the public? Issues of scientific integrity are longstanding, but COVID-19 brought them to the forefront, in an environment that was sometimes characterized by communication missteps as guidance came and went-or changed-quickly. Today, is open debate flourishing? Have some debates shed more heat than light? Are people losing confidence in science and medicine? In health care institutions? The American College of Physicians explores these issues and offers guidance in this position paper.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI