A win ratio approach for comparing crossing survival curves in clinical trials

危险系数 统计 对数秩检验 比例危险模型 数学 生存分析 危害 无效假设 事件(粒子物理) 计量经济学 I类和II类错误 蒙特卡罗方法 价值(数学) 置信区间 物理 量子力学 有机化学 化学
作者
Sirui Zheng,Duolao Wang,Junshan Qiu,Tao Chen,Margaret Gamalo
出处
期刊:Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:33 (4): 488-501 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1080/10543406.2023.2170393
摘要

Many clinical trials include time-to-event or survival data as an outcome. To compare two survival distributions, the log-rank test is often used to produce a P-value for a statistical test of the null hypothesis that the two survival curves are identical. However, such a P-value does not provide the magnitude of the difference between the curves regarding the treatment effect. As a result, the P-value is often accompanied by an estimate of the hazard ratio from the proportional hazards model or Cox model as a measurement of treatment difference. However, one of the most important assumptions for Cox model is that the hazard functions for the two treatment groups are proportional. When the hazard curves cross, the Cox model could lead to misleading results and the log-rank test could also perform poorly. To address the problem of crossing curves in survival analysis, we propose the use of the win ratio method put forward by Pocock et al. as an estimand for analysing such data. The subjects in the test and control treatment groups are formed into all possible pairs. For each pair, the test treatment subject is labelled a winner or a loser if it is known who had the event of interest such as death. The win ratio is the total number of winners divided by the total number of losers and its standard error can be estimated using Bebu and Lachin method. Using real trial datasets and Monte Carlo simulations, this study investigates the power and type I error and compares the win ratio method with the log-rank test and Cox model under various scenarios of crossing survival curves with different censoring rates and distribution parameters. The results show that the win ratio method has similar power as the log-rank test and Cox model to detect the treatment difference when the assumption of proportional hazards holds true, and that the win ratio method outperforms log-rank test and Cox model in terms of power to detect the treatment difference when the survival curves cross.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
喵喵张发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
123关闭了123文献求助
刚刚
刚刚
2秒前
2秒前
11111发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
神明发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
大模型应助谦让代芙采纳,获得10
6秒前
NexusExplorer应助JarryChao采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
TIMEIEXIST完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
BBIBBI完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
花筱一完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
shea发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Yuan完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
ACE发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
K神发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
星辰大海应助ark861023采纳,获得10
9秒前
灰色发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
hi发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
华仔应助111111采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
Mary给Mary的求助进行了留言
11秒前
如意的易真完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
HanZhang发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
nines完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
共享精神应助神明采纳,获得10
14秒前
领导范儿应助Sherlock采纳,获得30
14秒前
15秒前
小马甲应助雷寒云采纳,获得10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
Constitutional and Administrative Law 500
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice 300
Atlas of Anatomy (Fifth Edition) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5286781
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4439406
关于积分的说明 13821497
捐赠科研通 4321398
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2371854
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1367418
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1330879