医学
前交叉韧带
前外侧韧带
前交叉韧带损伤
枢轴移位试验
磁共振成像
眼泪
外科
尸体痉挛
前交叉韧带重建术
放射科
作者
Shu Watanabe,Kanto Nagai,Yuichi Hoshino,Kunio Kataoka,Yuta Nakanishi,Daisuke Araki,Noriyuki Kanzaki,Takehiko Matsushita,Ryosuke Kuroda
标识
DOI:10.1177/03635465221116097
摘要
Background: Biomechanical cadaveric studies have shown that Kaplan fibers (KFs) of the iliotibial band play a role in controlling anterolateral rotatory knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, in the clinical setting, the contribution of injury to KFs on anterolateral rotatory laxity remains unclear. Purpose: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to detect concomitant KF injury in ACL-injured knees and to then examine the effect of KF injury on anterolateral rotatory laxity as measured by the pivot-shift test in a clinical setting. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study enrolled 91 patients with primary ACL tears (mean age 25 ± 11 years; 46 male and 45 female) whose MRI was conducted within 90 days after injury. KF injury was assessed by MRI according to previously reported criteria, and the patients were allocated to a KF injury group and a no–KF injury group. At the time of ACL reconstruction, the pivot-shift test was performed with the patient under anesthesia and quantitatively evaluated by tibial acceleration using an electromagnetic measurement system. Manual grading of the pivot-shift test was assessed according to guidelines of the International Knee Documentation Committee. The data were statistically compared between the 2 groups using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test ( P < .05). Results: KFs were identified in 85 patients (93.4%), and KF injury was detected in 20 of the 85 patients (23.5%). No significant differences were observed between the KF injury group (n = 20) and the no–KF injury group (n = 65) in demographic characteristics, the period from injury to MRI (8.0 ± 14.0 days vs 8.9 ± 12.1 days, respectively), the rate of meniscal injury (50.0% vs 53.8%), or the rate of anterolateral ligament injury (45.0% vs 44.6%). Regarding the pivot-shift test, no significant differences were observed in tibial acceleration (1.2 m/s 2 [interquartile range, 0.5-2.1 m/s 2 ] vs 1.0 m/s 2 [interquartile range, 0.6-1.7 m/s 2 ], respectively) or manual grading between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Concomitant KF injury did not significantly affect the pivot-shift phenomenon in acute ACL-injured knees. The findings suggest that the contribution of KF injury to anterolateral rotatory knee laxity may be limited in the clinical setting.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI