Trends on treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed AML: Preliminary findings from a real-world analysis.

e18506 Background: In the last two decades, new therapeutic options have emerged to complement traditional intensive chemotherapy (IC) regimens in the treatment of Acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) protein inhibitor Venetoclax, and other targeted therapies are examples. Guideline-based treatment decisions are intricate, considering both patient fitness to IC and disease characteristics. AML real-word studies on treatment patterns typically focus on specific subpopulations (e.g., elderly or unfit patients), and few studies analyze broader populations. We analyzed an US electronic health records (EHR) database to describe AML treatment patterns. Methods: Study was designed as retrospective, descriptive analysis of deidentified secondary data from COTA database in the US. Data was abstracted for AML patients diagnosed for the first time between January 2017 and September 2022. Follow-up period (FP) was defined as the period starting at the diagnosis until the last information available for: death, or last contact, or the emergence of other malignancies. To improve descriptive analysis, treatment categories were classified accordingly: IC and non-IC. We conducted descriptive statistics (expressed as counts, percentages or means and medians [with SD or IQR]) for the different assessed features. Results: From the 3,500 patients included on the database, 1,436 were eligible for the analysis with a newly diagnosed AML disease after January 2017. Individuals’ age at diagnosis falls between 60 and 74 years old for 41% of the cohort with mean age of 64[15] years and 60% were followed on community centers. Male patients slightly outnumber female patients (53% and 47%, respectively). Primary AML accounted for 41% of the population and secondary for 28%. Mean time to first treatment after diagnosis was 14[42] days for the overall cohort, the main reason for the end of follow-up was death for 58% of individuals and 47% of the patients had a follow-up inferior to one year. While analyzing treatment patterns according to line of therapies (LoT) sequences, IC only was predominant for 30% of the population, followed by non-IC only for 28%. Remaining counts (42%) correspond to association of both categories. Most prevalent regimen on IC only group was High-dose Cytarabine monotherapy (HIDAC) (12%), and HMA (Azacitidine)+Venetoclax (27%) for the non-IC only group. Conclusions: Our preliminary and recent findings demonstrate that incidence of AML remains high in elderly groups. Despite the introduction of novel therapies, IC remains the predominant treatment approach for newly diagnosed AML patients. Our ongoing real-world analysis aims to assess a more detailed description of LoT sequences in AML population.