医学
观察研究
置信区间
优势比
内科学
损伤严重程度评分
前瞻性队列研究
相对风险
弗雷明翰风险评分
队列研究
急诊医学
毒物控制
伤害预防
疾病
作者
Chinenye Iwuchukwu,Grant E. O’Keefe,Andrew G. Day,Xuran Jiang,Daren K. Heyland
出处
期刊:The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2020-09-14
卷期号:89 (6): 1143-1148
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1097/ta.0000000000002937
摘要
BACKGROUND The modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score was developed to identify patients most likely to benefit from nutritional therapies and to stratify or select study subjects for clinical trials. The score is not validated in trauma victims in whom adequate nutritional support is important and difficult to achieve. We sought to determine whether a higher mNUTRIC score was associated with worse outcomes and whether caloric and protein intake improved outcome more in patients classified as high risk relative to those classified as low risk. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients from intensive care units globally. The primary outcome was 60-day hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was time to discharge alive. We compared outcomes between high and low mNUTRIC score groups and also tested whether the association between outcome and nutrition intake was modified by the mNUTRIC score. RESULTS A total of 771 trauma patients were included. Most (585; 76%) had a low-risk mNUTRIC (0–4) score, and 186 (24%) had a high-risk (5–9) mNUTRIC score. The overall 60-day mortality was 13%. Patients in the high mNUTRIC group had a higher risk of death than those in the low mNUTRIC group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–4.2). Overall, there was no relationship between caloric or protein intake and clinical outcomes. However, patients in the high mNUTRIC group fared better with increasing caloric and protein intake, whereas subjects in the low mNUTRIC score group did not ( p values for interaction with the mNUTRIC score for time to discharge alive was p = 0.014 for calories and was p = 0.004 for protein). CONCLUSION A high mNUTRIC score identifies trauma patients at higher risk for poor outcomes and those who may benefit from higher caloric and protein intake. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological/Prognostic, level III.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI