Coracoid morphology is not associated with subscapularis tears

Background The observation of the roller-wringer effect fueled the idea that coracoid morphology is related to subscapularis pathology. We aimed to examine this relationship, specifically focusing on how the coracohumeral distance (CHD) and 2 new metrics of coracoid morphology relate to subscapularis tears. Methods In this retrospective study, we identified consecutive patients 45 years or older who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for any indication. We blindly reviewed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies of each patient, measuring the CHD, lateral extent (LE), and caudal extent (CE) of the coracoid process. Patients' subscapularis condition was assessed via operative reports; stratified according to Lafosse grade criteria; and compared for differences in the CHD, LE, and CE by 1-way analysis of variance and 2-tailed t tests. Results The study included 201 patients. Of these, 112 had no evidence of subscapularis injury, whereas Lafosse grade I injuries were identified in 52 patients; grade II, in 19; and grades III-V, in 18. The CHD, LE, and CE were not correlated with subscapularis injury (CHD, P = .36; LE, P = .36; and CE, P = .13). Conclusions We found no correlation between subscapularis injury and the CHD, LE, and CE. These findings support the idea that coracoid morphology may not be a cause of subscapularis pathology and suggest that coracoplasty may not be necessary prophylactically or as part of subscapularis repair. The observation of the roller-wringer effect fueled the idea that coracoid morphology is related to subscapularis pathology. We aimed to examine this relationship, specifically focusing on how the coracohumeral distance (CHD) and 2 new metrics of coracoid morphology relate to subscapularis tears. In this retrospective study, we identified consecutive patients 45 years or older who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for any indication. We blindly reviewed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies of each patient, measuring the CHD, lateral extent (LE), and caudal extent (CE) of the coracoid process. Patients' subscapularis condition was assessed via operative reports; stratified according to Lafosse grade criteria; and compared for differences in the CHD, LE, and CE by 1-way analysis of variance and 2-tailed t tests. The study included 201 patients. Of these, 112 had no evidence of subscapularis injury, whereas Lafosse grade I injuries were identified in 52 patients; grade II, in 19; and grades III-V, in 18. The CHD, LE, and CE were not correlated with subscapularis injury (CHD, P = .36; LE, P = .36; and CE, P = .13). We found no correlation between subscapularis injury and the CHD, LE, and CE. These findings support the idea that coracoid morphology may not be a cause of subscapularis pathology and suggest that coracoplasty may not be necessary prophylactically or as part of subscapularis repair.