Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

医学 2型糖尿病 胰高血糖素样肽1受体 内科学 糖尿病 肾脏疾病 安慰剂 内分泌学 受体 兴奋剂 病理 替代医学
作者
Suetonia C. Palmer,Britta Tendal,Reem A. Mustafa,Per Olav Vandvik,Sheyu Li,Qiukui Hao,David J. Tunnicliffe,Marinella Ruospo,Patrizia Natale,Valeria Saglimbene,Antonio Nicolucci,David W. Johnson,Marcello Tonelli,Maria Chiara Rossi,Sunil V. Badve,Yeoungjee Cho,Annie‐Claire Nadeau‐Fredette,Michael Burke,Labib Imran Faruque,Anita Lloyd
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.m4573
摘要

Abstract Objective To evaluate sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying cardiovascular and renal risk. Design Network meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to 11 August 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists with placebo, standard care, or other glucose lowering treatment in adults with type 2 diabetes with follow up of 24 weeks or longer. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Main outcome measures Frequentist random effects network meta-analysis was carried out and GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) used to assess evidence certainty. Results included estimated absolute effects of treatment per 1000 patients treated for five years for patients at very low risk (no cardiovascular risk factors), low risk (three or more cardiovascular risk factors), moderate risk (cardiovascular disease), high risk (chronic kidney disease), and very high risk (cardiovascular disease and kidney disease). A guideline panel provided oversight of the systematic review. Results 764 trials including 421 346 patients proved eligible. All results refer to the addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists to existing diabetes treatment. Both classes of drugs lowered all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and kidney failure (high certainty evidence). Notable differences were found between the two agents: SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced admission to hospital for heart failure more than GLP-1 receptor agonists, and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced non-fatal stroke more than SGLT-2 inhibitors (which appeared to have no effect). SGLT-2 inhibitors caused genital infection (high certainty), whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists might cause severe gastrointestinal events (low certainty). Low certainty evidence suggested that SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists might lower body weight. Little or no evidence was found for the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists on limb amputation, blindness, eye disease, neuropathic pain, or health related quality of life. The absolute benefits of these drugs vary substantially across patients from low to very high risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes (eg, SGLT-2 inhibitors resulted in 3 to 40 fewer deaths in 1000 patients over five years; see interactive decision support tool ( https://magicevidence.org/match-it/200820dist/#!/ ) for all outcomes. Conclusions In patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced cardiovascular and renal outcomes, with some differences in benefits and harms. Absolute benefits are determined by individual risk profiles of patients, with clear implications for clinical practice, as reflected in the BMJ Rapid Recommendations directly informed by this systematic review. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019153180.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
秀丽茹妖发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Hello应助司康采纳,获得10
1秒前
知行合一发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
Two-Capitals发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ruanyousong发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
5秒前
ziyingxia完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
上官若男应助疯狂的听双采纳,获得10
5秒前
虚心的小兔子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
我是老大应助辛勤的晓兰采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
李cx发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
慕容冰璃完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
英姑应助YHX采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
Iris发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
CPD应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
英俊qiang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
ly应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 2000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 700
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 600
Zeolites: From Fundamentals to Emerging Applications 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5955172
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7165292
关于积分的说明 15937270
捐赠科研通 5090001
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2735504
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1696337
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1617268