Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

医学 2型糖尿病 胰高血糖素样肽1受体 内科学 糖尿病 肾脏疾病 安慰剂 内分泌学 受体 兴奋剂 病理 替代医学
作者
Suetonia C. Palmer,Britta Tendal,Reem A. Mustafa,Per Olav Vandvik,Sheyu Li,Qiukui Hao,David J. Tunnicliffe,Marinella Ruospo,Patrizia Natale,Valeria Saglimbene,Antonio Nicolucci,David W. Johnson,Marcello Tonelli,Maria Chiara Rossi,Sunil V. Badve,Yeoungjee Cho,Annie‐Claire Nadeau‐Fredette,Michael Burke,Labib Imran Faruque,Anita Lloyd,Nasreen Ahmad,Yuanchen Liu,Sophanny Tiv,Tanya Millard,Lucia Gagliardi,Nithin Kolanu,Rahul D. Barmanray,Rita McMorrow,Ana Karina Raygoza Cortez,Heath White,Xiang‐Yang Chen,Xu Zhou,Jiali Liu,Andrea Flores Rodríguez,Alejandro Díaz González-Colmenero,Yang Wang,Ling Li,Surya Sutanto,Ricardo César Solís,Fernando Díaz González-Colmenero,René Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez,Michael Walsh,Gordon Guyatt,Giovanni FM Strippoli
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.m4573
摘要

Abstract Objective To evaluate sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying cardiovascular and renal risk. Design Network meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to 11 August 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists with placebo, standard care, or other glucose lowering treatment in adults with type 2 diabetes with follow up of 24 weeks or longer. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Main outcome measures Frequentist random effects network meta-analysis was carried out and GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) used to assess evidence certainty. Results included estimated absolute effects of treatment per 1000 patients treated for five years for patients at very low risk (no cardiovascular risk factors), low risk (three or more cardiovascular risk factors), moderate risk (cardiovascular disease), high risk (chronic kidney disease), and very high risk (cardiovascular disease and kidney disease). A guideline panel provided oversight of the systematic review. Results 764 trials including 421 346 patients proved eligible. All results refer to the addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists to existing diabetes treatment. Both classes of drugs lowered all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and kidney failure (high certainty evidence). Notable differences were found between the two agents: SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced admission to hospital for heart failure more than GLP-1 receptor agonists, and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced non-fatal stroke more than SGLT-2 inhibitors (which appeared to have no effect). SGLT-2 inhibitors caused genital infection (high certainty), whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists might cause severe gastrointestinal events (low certainty). Low certainty evidence suggested that SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists might lower body weight. Little or no evidence was found for the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists on limb amputation, blindness, eye disease, neuropathic pain, or health related quality of life. The absolute benefits of these drugs vary substantially across patients from low to very high risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes (eg, SGLT-2 inhibitors resulted in 3 to 40 fewer deaths in 1000 patients over five years; see interactive decision support tool ( https://magicevidence.org/match-it/200820dist/#!/ ) for all outcomes. Conclusions In patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced cardiovascular and renal outcomes, with some differences in benefits and harms. Absolute benefits are determined by individual risk profiles of patients, with clear implications for clinical practice, as reflected in the BMJ Rapid Recommendations directly informed by this systematic review. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019153180.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wang5945发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
失眠觅云发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
handsomelin发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
ZhaoCun完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
深情安青应助Unbelievable采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
zai发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
坤坤发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Cmdbjzw完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
赘婿应助sqw采纳,获得20
10秒前
Jasper应助阳pipi采纳,获得10
10秒前
66666应助123采纳,获得10
10秒前
草木人发布了新的文献求助50
11秒前
珂珂子完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
一二三完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
失眠觅云发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
QDU应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
迷人素发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
CodeCraft应助花开采纳,获得10
15秒前
石头完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
acca发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
仁爱书白完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
马婷婷发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
zanilia应助handsomelin采纳,获得10
20秒前
666发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Effect of reactor temperature on FCC yield 2000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 1020
Cognitive Paradigms in Knowledge Organisation 1000
Near Infrared Spectra of Origin-defined and Real-world Textiles (NIR-SORT): A spectroscopic and materials characterization dataset for known provenance and post-consumer fabrics 610
Mission to Mao: Us Intelligence and the Chinese Communists in World War II 600
Promoting women's entrepreneurship in developing countries: the case of the world's largest women-owned community-based enterprise 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3306956
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2940786
关于积分的说明 8498612
捐赠科研通 2614927
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1428599
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 663447
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 648297