Electroacupuncture versus manual acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled pilot trial

医学 电针 针灸科 物理疗法 沃马克 骨关节炎 随机对照试验 置信区间 优势比 外科 内科学 替代医学 病理
作者
Tianqi Wang,Yongting Li,Yu Wang,Guang‐Xia Shi,Jian‐Feng Tu,Jing‐Wen Yang,Ya‐Quan Hou,Lu‐Lu Lin,Ning Sun,Jingjie Zhao,Hai-Kun Hou,Cun‐Zhi Liu
出处
期刊:Acupuncture in Medicine [SAGE]
卷期号:38 (5): 291-300 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1177/0964528419900781
摘要

Objective: We aimed to explore the feasibility of evaluating the comparative effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) relative to manual acupuncture (MA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in Beijing from September 2017 to January 2018. A total of 60 participants with KOA were randomly allocated to either EA ( n = 30) or MA ( n = 30) groups. Participants in the EA group were treated with EA at six to seven local traditional acupuncture points or ah shi points, and two to three distal points. Participants in the MA group had the same schedule as the EA group except that the electrical apparatus featured a working power indicator without actual current output, constituting a sham EA procedure, in order to blind participants. Both groups received 24 sessions over 8 weeks. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as a change of ⩾50% from baseline in the total scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included pain, stiffness, function, quality of life, and acupuncture-related adverse events (AEs) at 4 and 8 weeks. Results: Of 60 participants randomized, 53 (88%) completed the study. Response rates were 43% for the EA group and 30% for the MA group by the intention-to-treat analysis. Although significant differences were observed in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function scores within both groups, between-group differences at 8 weeks did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio = 1.75 (95% confidence interval = 0.593–5.162)). Rates of AEs were low and similarly distributed between groups. Conclusion: Both EA and MA interventions in KOA were feasible and appeared safe. Whether or not EA may have a stronger impact on pain and function requires further evaluation through larger, adequately powered, randomized controlled trials. Trial registration number: NCT03274713.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ybb完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
快乐的伟诚完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
搜集达人应助大胆夜绿采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
辛勤的无血完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
rookie完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
ni完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
step_stone给step_stone的求助进行了留言
12秒前
12秒前
荒野星辰发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
敏感的芷完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
luoshi应助沐风采纳,获得20
16秒前
安南完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
香蕉冬云完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
自信安荷发布了新的文献求助200
17秒前
鱼雷发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
兔子发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
田様应助coffee采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
专注鼠标完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
LingYing完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
cheche完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
liushun完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
caoyy发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
zzt发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
24秒前
24秒前
章家炜发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
脑洞疼应助xfxx采纳,获得10
25秒前
wanci应助茶博士采纳,获得10
25秒前
所所应助YYT采纳,获得10
26秒前
匿名网友完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527990
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108173
关于积分的说明 9287913
捐赠科研通 2805882
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540119
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716941
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709824