Electroacupuncture versus manual acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled pilot trial

医学 电针 针灸科 物理疗法 沃马克 骨关节炎 随机对照试验 置信区间 优势比 外科 内科学 替代医学 病理
作者
Tianqi Wang,Yongting Li,Yu Wang,Guang‐Xia Shi,Jian‐Feng Tu,Jing‐Wen Yang,Ya‐Quan Hou,Lu‐Lu Lin,Ning Sun,Jingjie Zhao,Hai-Kun Hou,Cun‐Zhi Liu
出处
期刊:Acupuncture in Medicine [SAGE]
卷期号:38 (5): 291-300 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1177/0964528419900781
摘要

Objective: We aimed to explore the feasibility of evaluating the comparative effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) relative to manual acupuncture (MA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in Beijing from September 2017 to January 2018. A total of 60 participants with KOA were randomly allocated to either EA ( n = 30) or MA ( n = 30) groups. Participants in the EA group were treated with EA at six to seven local traditional acupuncture points or ah shi points, and two to three distal points. Participants in the MA group had the same schedule as the EA group except that the electrical apparatus featured a working power indicator without actual current output, constituting a sham EA procedure, in order to blind participants. Both groups received 24 sessions over 8 weeks. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as a change of ⩾50% from baseline in the total scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included pain, stiffness, function, quality of life, and acupuncture-related adverse events (AEs) at 4 and 8 weeks. Results: Of 60 participants randomized, 53 (88%) completed the study. Response rates were 43% for the EA group and 30% for the MA group by the intention-to-treat analysis. Although significant differences were observed in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function scores within both groups, between-group differences at 8 weeks did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio = 1.75 (95% confidence interval = 0.593–5.162)). Rates of AEs were low and similarly distributed between groups. Conclusion: Both EA and MA interventions in KOA were feasible and appeared safe. Whether or not EA may have a stronger impact on pain and function requires further evaluation through larger, adequately powered, randomized controlled trials. Trial registration number: NCT03274713.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
淡淡的若冰应助123采纳,获得20
3秒前
oceanao举报巧可脆脆求助涉嫌违规
3秒前
明天要摆烂完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
beyondmin完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
调研昵称发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
ryota发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
缺粥发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
华仔应助冷酷的风华采纳,获得10
10秒前
嘀嘀嘀发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
lalala发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
文献发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
15秒前
15秒前
务实静槐完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
hmfyl完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
在水一方应助huco采纳,获得10
16秒前
Jilin完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
天天快乐应助小羊采纳,获得10
17秒前
Vashon发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
星光发布了新的文献求助20
19秒前
Accepted发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
chun发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
简单的丑完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
天天向上完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
费慕青发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
24秒前
文献完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
24秒前
JamesPei应助mike5492采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
27秒前
27秒前
28秒前
小羊发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 600
Distribution Dependent Stochastic Differential Equations 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3157519
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2808909
关于积分的说明 7879293
捐赠科研通 2467387
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1313431
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 630398
版权声明 601919