适度
分类
多样性(政治)
心理学
社会心理学
集合(抽象数据类型)
精化
群体决策
认知心理学
知识管理
计算机科学
社会学
人工智能
哲学
人类学
人文学科
程序设计语言
作者
Daan van Knippenberg,Carsten K. W. De Dreu,Astrid C. Homan
标识
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
摘要
Research on the relationship between work group diversity and performance has yielded inconsistent results. To address this problem, the authors propose the categorization-elaboration model (CEM), which reconceptualizes and integrates information/decision making and social categorization perspectives on work-group diversity and performance. The CEM incorporates mediator and moderator variables that typically have been ignored in diversity research and incorporates the view that information/decision making and social categorization processes interact such that intergroup biases flowing from social categorization disrupt the elaboration (in-depth processing) of task-relevant information and perspectives. In addition, the authors propose that attempts to link the positive and negative effects of diversity to specific types of diversity should be abandoned in favor of the assumption that all dimensions of diversity may have positive as well as negative effects. The ways in which these propositions may set the agenda for future research in diversity are discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI