冲击系数
文献计量学
医学
引用
索引(排版)
秩(图论)
生产力
引文分析
意义(存在)
精算学
计算机科学
图书馆学
数学
心理学
经济
宏观经济学
组合数学
万维网
政治学
法学
心理治疗师
作者
Asim F. Choudhri,Adeel Siddiqui,Nickalus R. Khan,Harris L. Cohen
出处
期刊:Radiographics
[Radiological Society of North America]
日期:2015-05-01
卷期号:35 (3): 736-746
被引量:250
标识
DOI:10.1148/rg.2015140036
摘要
Bibliometric parameters have become an important part of modern assessment of academic productivity. These parameters exist for the purpose of evaluating authors (publication count, citation count, h-index, m-quotient, hc-index, e-index, g-index, i-10 [i-n] index) and journals (impact factor, Eigenfactor, article influence score, SCImago journal rank, source-normalized impact per paper). Although in recent years there has been a proliferation of bibliometric parameters, the true meaning and appropriate use of these parameters is generally not well understood. Effective use of existing and emerging bibliometric tools can aid in assessment of academic productivity, including readiness for promotions and other awards. However, if not properly understood, the data can be misinterpreted and may be subject to manipulation. Familiarity with bibliometric parameters will aid in their effective implementation in the review of authors-whether individuals or groups-and journals, as well as their possible use in the promotions review process, maximizing the effectiveness of bibliometric analysis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI