医学
氯吡格雷
传统PCI
临床试验
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
抗血小板药物
冠状动脉支架
血小板聚集抑制剂
介入心脏病学
内科学
药物洗脱支架
不利影响
重症监护医学
心脏病学
阿司匹林
心肌梗塞
外科
支架
再狭窄
作者
Yosuke Miyazaki,Pannipa Suwannasom,Yohei Sotomi,Mohammad Abdelghani,Karthik Tummala,Yuki Katagiri,Taku Asano,Erhan Tenekecioğlu,Yaping Zeng,Rafael Cavalcante,Carlos Collet,Yoshinobu Onuma,Patrick W. Serruys
标识
DOI:10.1038/nrcardio.2017.12
摘要
The optimal duration and type of antiplatelet therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES) remains uncertain. At the time of the first-in-man implantation of the sirolimus DES in 1999, the protocol-defined dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration was only 2 months. Subsequently, DAPT duration was extended to 1 year on the basis of anecdotal historical data, and this practice was then incorporated into clinical guidelines. For >1 decade, trialists have sought to compare the safety and efficacy of abbreviated (<6 months) and prolonged (>12 months) DAPT regimens. However, the body of evidence is limited by the heterogeneity of end points, time of randomization, and bleeding criteria used in each trial. Pharmaceutical advances led to the introduction of new ADP-receptor antagonists, which are thought to be more effective than clopidogrel. The ADP-receptor antagonists moved the focus from the optimal duration of DAPT to the potential efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation. In this Review, we summarize the current evidence on the duration of DAPT and the risk of bleeding and adverse cardiac events after DES implantation, and describe the pitfalls of trial interpretation. The ongoing, prospective trials to test single antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation are also discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI