Telemedical Intensivist Consultation During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

医学 复苏 重症医师 远程医疗 随机对照试验 心肺复苏术 急诊医学 除颤 干预(咨询) 医疗急救 重症监护医学
作者
Ithan D. Peltan,David Guidry,Katie Brown,Naresh Kumar,William Beninati,Samuel M. Brown
出处
期刊:Chest [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:162 (1): 111-119 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.017
摘要

Background

High-quality leadership improves resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), but experienced resuscitation leaders are unavailable in many settings.

Research Question

Does real-time telemedical intensivist consultation improve resuscitation quality for IHCA?

Study Design and Methods

In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, standardized high-fidelity simulations of IHCA conducted between February 2017 and September 2018 on inpatient medicine and surgery units at seven hospitals were assigned randomly to consultation (intervention) or simulated observation (control) by a critical care physician via telemedicine. The primary outcome was the fraction of time without chest compressions (ie, no-flow fraction) during an approximately 4- to 6-min analysis window beginning with telemedicine activation. Secondary outcomes included other measures of chest compression quality, defibrillation and medication timing, resuscitation protocol adherence, nontechnical team performance, and participants' experience during resuscitation participation.

Results

No-flow fraction did not differ between the 36 intervention group (0.22 ± 0.13) and the 35 control group (0.19 ± 0.10) resuscitation simulations included in the intention-to-treat analysis (P = .41). The etiology of the simulated cardiac arrest was identified more often during evaluable resuscitations supported by a telemedical intensivist consultant (22/32 [69%]) compared with control resuscitations (10/34 [29%]; P = .001), but other measures of resuscitation quality, resuscitation team performance, and participant experience did not differ between intervention groups. Problems with audio quality or the telemedicine connection affected 14 intervention group resuscitations (39%).

Interpretation

Consultation by a telemedical intensivist physician did not improve resuscitation quality during simulated ward-based IHCA.

Trial Registry

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03000829; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
Yujia发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
纳兰嫣然发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
积极的凌波完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
lili发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小z完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
糊涂的雅琴应助幽默问枫采纳,获得30
5秒前
leb完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助风清扬采纳,获得30
6秒前
Ruby发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
池鱼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Noneone110发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
Lucas应助www采纳,获得10
8秒前
英俊的铭应助栀子采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
皮老八发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
健忘从灵完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Roach关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
11秒前
anyilin完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
molihuakai应助双子土豆泥采纳,获得10
12秒前
结实的南露完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
宇宙拿铁完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Nia完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
举了个橙子完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
李健应助牛小浓采纳,获得10
13秒前
zxt发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
dd发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
东方红完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
ZZzz完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
The Immune System (Fifth Edition) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6557699
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8341342
关于积分的说明 17871688
捐赠科研通 5676932
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2940994
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1916833
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1787914