Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy

结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 医学 人工智能 腺瘤 大肠息肉 深度学习 结直肠癌 人口 接收机工作特性 内科学 计算机科学 胃肠病学 癌症 环境卫生
作者
Gregor Urban,Priyam Tripathi,Talal Alkayali,Mohit Mittal,Farid Jalali,William E. Karnes,Pierre Baldi
出处
期刊:Gastroenterology [Elsevier]
卷期号:155 (4): 1069-1078.e8 被引量:622
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.037
摘要

Background & AimsThe benefit of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention depends on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The ADR should reflect the adenoma prevalence rate, which is estimated to be higher than 50% in the screening-age population. However, the ADR by colonoscopists varies from 7% to 53%. It is estimated that every 1% increase in ADR lowers the risk of interval colorectal cancers by 3%–6%. New strategies are needed to increase the ADR during colonoscopy. We tested the ability of computer-assisted image analysis using convolutional neural networks (CNNs; a deep learning model for image analysis) to improve polyp detection, a surrogate of ADR.MethodsWe designed and trained deep CNNs to detect polyps using a diverse and representative set of 8,641 hand-labeled images from screening colonoscopies collected from more than 2000 patients. We tested the models on 20 colonoscopy videos with a total duration of 5 hours. Expert colonoscopists were asked to identify all polyps in 9 de-identified colonoscopy videos, which were selected from archived video studies, with or without benefit of the CNN overlay. Their findings were compared with those of the CNN using CNN-assisted expert review as the reference.ResultsWhen tested on manually labeled images, the CNN identified polyps with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 and an accuracy of 96.4%. In the analysis of colonoscopy videos in which 28 polyps were removed, 4 expert reviewers identified 8 additional polyps without CNN assistance that had not been removed and identified an additional 17 polyps with CNN assistance (45 in total). All polyps removed and identified by expert review were detected by the CNN. The CNN had a false-positive rate of 7%.ConclusionIn a set of 8,641 colonoscopy images containing 4,088 unique polyps, the CNN identified polyps with a cross-validation accuracy of 96.4% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991. The CNN system detected and localized polyps well within real-time constraints using an ordinary desktop machine with a contemporary graphics processing unit. This system could increase the ADR and decrease interval colorectal cancers but requires validation in large multicenter trials. The benefit of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention depends on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The ADR should reflect the adenoma prevalence rate, which is estimated to be higher than 50% in the screening-age population. However, the ADR by colonoscopists varies from 7% to 53%. It is estimated that every 1% increase in ADR lowers the risk of interval colorectal cancers by 3%–6%. New strategies are needed to increase the ADR during colonoscopy. We tested the ability of computer-assisted image analysis using convolutional neural networks (CNNs; a deep learning model for image analysis) to improve polyp detection, a surrogate of ADR. We designed and trained deep CNNs to detect polyps using a diverse and representative set of 8,641 hand-labeled images from screening colonoscopies collected from more than 2000 patients. We tested the models on 20 colonoscopy videos with a total duration of 5 hours. Expert colonoscopists were asked to identify all polyps in 9 de-identified colonoscopy videos, which were selected from archived video studies, with or without benefit of the CNN overlay. Their findings were compared with those of the CNN using CNN-assisted expert review as the reference. When tested on manually labeled images, the CNN identified polyps with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 and an accuracy of 96.4%. In the analysis of colonoscopy videos in which 28 polyps were removed, 4 expert reviewers identified 8 additional polyps without CNN assistance that had not been removed and identified an additional 17 polyps with CNN assistance (45 in total). All polyps removed and identified by expert review were detected by the CNN. The CNN had a false-positive rate of 7%. In a set of 8,641 colonoscopy images containing 4,088 unique polyps, the CNN identified polyps with a cross-validation accuracy of 96.4% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991. The CNN system detected and localized polyps well within real-time constraints using an ordinary desktop machine with a contemporary graphics processing unit. This system could increase the ADR and decrease interval colorectal cancers but requires validation in large multicenter trials.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
赤雪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xxx发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Jupiter 1234发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
1秒前
pure发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
向北完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
iNk应助米诺子采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
张泽华完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
HHW发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
smottom应助hui采纳,获得10
4秒前
jksg完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
彭于晏应助在远方采纳,获得10
4秒前
Jared应助wuran采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
ATP发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
zwx完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
nieziyun发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
在水一方应助木12123采纳,获得10
6秒前
pure完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
愉快奇异果完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
pumpkin完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
坚强的元珊应助猪猪hero采纳,获得20
9秒前
徐徐发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
Awalong完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
sinlar发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
花怜完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
刘彤完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
hhhhhhhhhh完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
笨笨娇发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
Chemistry and Biochemistry: Research Progress Vol. 7 430
Biotechnology Engineering 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5629957
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4721200
关于积分的说明 14971845
捐赠科研通 4787915
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2556638
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1517713
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1478320