Relationship between monetary delay discounting and obesity: a systematic review and meta-regression

医学 心理信息 荟萃分析 逻辑回归 贴现 梅德林 斯科普斯 人口学 内科学 经济 生物 财务 生物化学 社会学
作者
Jianjun Tang,Oliver J. Chrzanowski‐Smith,George Hutchinson,Frank Kee,Ruth F. Hunter
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obesity [Springer Nature]
卷期号:43 (6): 1135-1146 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41366-018-0265-0
摘要

Previous studies have documented that high rates of delay discounting are associated with obesity. However, studies utilizing monetary reward experiments typically report no associations, as opposed to positive associations apparent in studies utilising food-reward experiments. Our objective was to investigate the reasons behind the mixed evidence from a methodological perspective using systematic review and meta-analytic methodologies.Seven databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit and IBSS) were systematically searched. Logistic meta-regression was applied to identify the determinants of a significant association and risk of bias was assessed using a modified form of the Newcastle Ottawa cohort scale.A total of 59 studies were identified, among which 29 studies (49.2%) found a significant positive association and 29 (49.2%) reported no association. A higher proportion of significant and positive associations was reported in those studies utilizing 'best-practice' methods (i.e. appropriate measurement models) to estimate monetary delay discounting (15/27; 55.6%) and incentive-compatible experiments (10/16; 62.5%) than those using non-'best-practice' methods (14/34; 41.2%) and hypothetical experiments (19/43; 44.2%). All five studies utilizing both 'best-practice' methods and incentive-compatible experiments generated a positive and significant relationship. Results from a logistic meta-regression also suggested that studies employing incentive-compatible experiments (OR: 4.38, 95% CI = 1.05-18.33, p value: 0.04), 'best-practice' methods (OR: 4.40, 95% CI = 0.88-22.99, p value: 0.07), parametric methods (OR: 3.36, 95% CI = 0.83-13.57, p value: 0.04), those conducted in children/adolescent populations (OR: 3.90, 95% CI = 0.85-17.88, p value: 0.08), and those with larger sample size (OR: 1.91, 95% CI = 1.15-3.18, p value: 0.01) tended to show positive and significant associations between delay discounting and obesity.This review suggests that the mixed evidence to date is a result of methodological heterogeneity, and that future studies should utilise 'best practice' methods.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
燕燕完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
缓慢煎蛋应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
无极微光应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
刚刚
CodeCraft应助zch采纳,获得10
1秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小美采纳,获得10
1秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Yo南山应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
时尚觅松发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
小象腿完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
2秒前
大模型应助淡然的易真采纳,获得10
3秒前
小马甲应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
海山应助诚心的大侠采纳,获得10
3秒前
DX发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小二郎应助呼啦啦啦采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
xwm完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
minghanl完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
hudaodao完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
陌散发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
积极觅云发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
8秒前
sadsada发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
无花果应助vicky采纳,获得10
9秒前
bkagyin应助锐4113采纳,获得10
10秒前
浮游应助wangzhen采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
奥小棋完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Lucas应助joe55667788采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
小七发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
GL 2 A method for assessing the in-place cleanability of food processing equipment, Fourth Edition, December 2023 3000
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Advanced Memory Technology 500
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6862207
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8565498
关于积分的说明 18214119
捐赠科研通 6229044
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3048009
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2048555
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2025619