Relationship between monetary delay discounting and obesity: a systematic review and meta-regression

医学 心理信息 荟萃分析 逻辑回归 贴现 梅德林 斯科普斯 人口学 内科学 经济 生物 财务 生物化学 社会学
作者
Jianjun Tang,Oliver J. Chrzanowski‐Smith,George Hutchinson,Frank Kee,Ruth F. Hunter
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obesity [Springer Nature]
卷期号:43 (6): 1135-1146 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41366-018-0265-0
摘要

Previous studies have documented that high rates of delay discounting are associated with obesity. However, studies utilizing monetary reward experiments typically report no associations, as opposed to positive associations apparent in studies utilising food-reward experiments. Our objective was to investigate the reasons behind the mixed evidence from a methodological perspective using systematic review and meta-analytic methodologies.Seven databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit and IBSS) were systematically searched. Logistic meta-regression was applied to identify the determinants of a significant association and risk of bias was assessed using a modified form of the Newcastle Ottawa cohort scale.A total of 59 studies were identified, among which 29 studies (49.2%) found a significant positive association and 29 (49.2%) reported no association. A higher proportion of significant and positive associations was reported in those studies utilizing 'best-practice' methods (i.e. appropriate measurement models) to estimate monetary delay discounting (15/27; 55.6%) and incentive-compatible experiments (10/16; 62.5%) than those using non-'best-practice' methods (14/34; 41.2%) and hypothetical experiments (19/43; 44.2%). All five studies utilizing both 'best-practice' methods and incentive-compatible experiments generated a positive and significant relationship. Results from a logistic meta-regression also suggested that studies employing incentive-compatible experiments (OR: 4.38, 95% CI = 1.05-18.33, p value: 0.04), 'best-practice' methods (OR: 4.40, 95% CI = 0.88-22.99, p value: 0.07), parametric methods (OR: 3.36, 95% CI = 0.83-13.57, p value: 0.04), those conducted in children/adolescent populations (OR: 3.90, 95% CI = 0.85-17.88, p value: 0.08), and those with larger sample size (OR: 1.91, 95% CI = 1.15-3.18, p value: 0.01) tended to show positive and significant associations between delay discounting and obesity.This review suggests that the mixed evidence to date is a result of methodological heterogeneity, and that future studies should utilise 'best practice' methods.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
吉文彬完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
忧郁的凝竹完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
DYW完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
从容以山完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
xixi发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
苏幕遮完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
近未来完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小象完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
jolt完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
深情安青应助优美电脑采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
乐乐应助自然的岱周采纳,获得10
5秒前
三星级读书完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Sue完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
慕青应助wangcw采纳,获得10
6秒前
小蘑菇应助蛋堡洋芋采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
从容以山发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
雨后蜻蜓完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
chenqiumu应助肯瑞恩哭哭采纳,获得50
7秒前
子小雨记发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
yangqi完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
天天快乐应助苏幕遮采纳,获得10
8秒前
畅快代柔发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
动听的鸽子完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
syyyy发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
万能图书馆应助雨后蜻蜓采纳,获得10
10秒前
xixi完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
Star完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
不想看文献完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
慕青应助迷你的惋庭采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 340
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5259760
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4421264
关于积分的说明 13762582
捐赠科研通 4295161
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2356757
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1353139
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1314315