Relationship between monetary delay discounting and obesity: a systematic review and meta-regression

医学 心理信息 荟萃分析 逻辑回归 贴现 梅德林 斯科普斯 人口学 内科学 经济 生物 生物化学 财务 社会学
作者
Jianjun Tang,Oliver J. Chrzanowski‐Smith,George Hutchinson,Frank Kee,Ruth F. Hunter
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obesity [Springer Nature]
卷期号:43 (6): 1135-1146 被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41366-018-0265-0
摘要

Previous studies have documented that high rates of delay discounting are associated with obesity. However, studies utilizing monetary reward experiments typically report no associations, as opposed to positive associations apparent in studies utilising food-reward experiments. Our objective was to investigate the reasons behind the mixed evidence from a methodological perspective using systematic review and meta-analytic methodologies.Seven databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit and IBSS) were systematically searched. Logistic meta-regression was applied to identify the determinants of a significant association and risk of bias was assessed using a modified form of the Newcastle Ottawa cohort scale.A total of 59 studies were identified, among which 29 studies (49.2%) found a significant positive association and 29 (49.2%) reported no association. A higher proportion of significant and positive associations was reported in those studies utilizing 'best-practice' methods (i.e. appropriate measurement models) to estimate monetary delay discounting (15/27; 55.6%) and incentive-compatible experiments (10/16; 62.5%) than those using non-'best-practice' methods (14/34; 41.2%) and hypothetical experiments (19/43; 44.2%). All five studies utilizing both 'best-practice' methods and incentive-compatible experiments generated a positive and significant relationship. Results from a logistic meta-regression also suggested that studies employing incentive-compatible experiments (OR: 4.38, 95% CI = 1.05-18.33, p value: 0.04), 'best-practice' methods (OR: 4.40, 95% CI = 0.88-22.99, p value: 0.07), parametric methods (OR: 3.36, 95% CI = 0.83-13.57, p value: 0.04), those conducted in children/adolescent populations (OR: 3.90, 95% CI = 0.85-17.88, p value: 0.08), and those with larger sample size (OR: 1.91, 95% CI = 1.15-3.18, p value: 0.01) tended to show positive and significant associations between delay discounting and obesity.This review suggests that the mixed evidence to date is a result of methodological heterogeneity, and that future studies should utilise 'best practice' methods.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LIUYONG发布了新的文献求助150
刚刚
球球昂完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小彻发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
思源应助积极又向上采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
xx完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
llll完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
烨然发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
保卫时光完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
LQS完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Tyranny完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
勤奋的绪发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
朱大妹完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
求知若渴完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
挽风风风风完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
cxlhzq发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
果粒多完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
gky完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
斑鸠津发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
8秒前
天阳完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Lucas应助WYBZD采纳,获得10
8秒前
Sherwin完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
曾经电源完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
eltiempo完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
laoli2022发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
shiqiyu发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
wykkkkk发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Shane完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
今天你读文献了吗完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
无奈太英发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
三年护法关注了科研通微信公众号
12秒前
12秒前
hanyingwang完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Jackcaosky完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
好运锦鲤完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3516843
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3099028
关于积分的说明 9242843
捐赠科研通 2794309
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1533384
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 712805
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 707431