厄他培南
医学
哌拉西林/他唑巴坦
美罗培南
重症监护医学
他唑巴坦
哌拉西林
头孢他啶/阿维巴坦
抗生素
亚胺培南
碳青霉烯
β-内酰胺酶抑制剂
头孢他啶
抗生素耐药性
微生物学
铜绿假单胞菌
生物
遗传学
细菌
作者
Carlota Gudiol,Guillermo Cuervo,Jordi Carratalà
出处
期刊:Current Opinion in Critical Care
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2019-08-01
卷期号:25 (5): 438-448
被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcc.0000000000000646
摘要
Purpose of review Infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) are increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are usually regarded as the antibiotics of choice for the treatment of serious ESBL infections. However, because of the alarming emergence or carbapenem resistance, interest in effective alternatives has emerged. The present review summarizes the findings published on the antibiotics currently available for treatment of patients with an ESBL-E bloodstream infection (BSI). Recent findings Meropenem and imipenem are the drugs recommended for treatment of ESBL BSIs in critically ill patients, and in infections with high bacterial loads or elevated β-lactam minimum inhibitory concentrations. Ertapenem should be reserved for patients with less severe presentations, and should be used at high doses. In milder presentations or BSIs from low-risk sources, other carbapenem-sparing alternatives could be considered: cephamycins, fluoroquinolones, and particularly a β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitor combination (particularly piperacillin/tazobactam). Optimized dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam is recommended (high doses and extended infusion). There are few data on the use of the promising newly available drugs (e.g. ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, and plazomicin), and it seems reasonable to reserve them as last-resort drugs. Summary Carbapenems should be used in patients with serious infections; alternatives could be used individually, particularly for definitive treatment of patients with milder presentations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI