瘢痕疙瘩
细菌
生物
痤疮丙酸杆菌
丙酸杆菌
转录组
微生物学
医学
病理
遗传学
基因
基因表达
作者
Mengjie Shan,Meng Xiao,Jiyu Xu,Wei‐Zen Sun,Zerui Wang,Wenbin Du,Xiaoyu Liu,Meng Nie,Xing Wang,Zhengyun Liang,Hao Liu,Hao Yan,Yijun Xia,Lin Zhu,Kexin Song,Cheng Feng,Tian Meng,Zhi Wang,Weifang Cao,Lin Wang,Zhi Zheng,Youbin Wang,Yongsheng Huang
出处
期刊:EBioMedicine
[Elsevier]
日期:2023-12-06
卷期号:99: 104904-104904
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104904
摘要
Summary
Background
The pathology of keloid and especially the roles of bacteria on it were not well understood. Methods
In this study, multi-omics analyses including microbiome, metaproteomics, metabolomic, single-cell transcriptome and cell-derived xenograft (CDX) mice model were used to explore the roles of bacteria on keloid disease. Findings
We found that the types of bacteria are significantly different between keloid and healthy skin. The 16S rRNA sequencing and metaproteomics showed that more catalase (CAT) negative bacteria, Clostridium and Roseburia existed in keloid compared with the adjacent healthy skin. In addition, protein mass spectrometry shows that CAT is one of the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Overexpression of CAT inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of keloid fibroblasts, and these characteristics were opposite when CAT was knocked down. Furthermore, the CDX model showed that Clostridium butyricum promote the growth of patient's keloid fibroblasts in BALB/c female nude mice, while CAT positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis inhibited it. Single-cell RNA sequencing verified that oxidative stress was up-regulated and CAT was down-regulated in mesenchymal-like fibroblasts of keloid. Interpretation
In conclusion, our findings suggest that bacteria and CAT contribute to keloid disease. Funding
A full list of funding bodies that contributed to this study can be found in the Acknowledgements section.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI