An evaluation of the use of double-curved endoscopes for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

医学 内窥镜 人口统计学的 倾向得分匹配 内科学 回顾性队列研究 观察研究 外科 胃肠病学 人口学 社会学
作者
Luojie Liu,Xiaodan Xu,Qinghua Wang,Yunfu Feng,Fenying Lu,Qiushi Tian,Dan Shi,Rui Li,Weichang Chen
出处
期刊:Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies [Informa]
卷期号:32 (3): 112-118 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1080/13645706.2023.2186182
摘要

AbstractAbstractBackground Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a standard treatment method for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs). Evidence of the safety and efficacy of a double-curved endoscope (DCE) in EFTR of gGISTs is limited. We aimed to compare the operative outcomes of DCE versus single-curved endoscopes (SCE) in EFTR of gGISTs.Material and methods This retrospective observational study was conducted at four Chinese tertiary institutes. From January 2019 to November 2021, 104 patients who underwent EFTR by SCE (n = 57) or DCE (n = 47) were enrolled. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups to compare the demographics and operative outcomes.Results All gGISTs were resected successfully with no recurrence during follow-up. The median (range) tumor size was 1.2 (0.5, 3.5) cm in DCE and 2.0 (0.6, 4.8) cm in SCE (p < .001), and the procedure time was shorter in the DCE group than in the SCE group (50.0 min vs. 62.0 min, p < .05). After PSM, 41 pairs were selected, and no difference was noted in demographics. The procedure time was also shorter in the DCE group than in the SCE group (50.0 min vs. 55.0 min, p < .05). Subgroup analysis showed that the DCE group had a shorter procedure time in the gastric fundus than the SCE group (47.0 min vs. 55.0 min, p < .05). In multiple linear regression analysis, significant factors related to prolonged procedure time were the type of endoscope of SCE and larger tumor size (p < .05).Conclusions EFTR of gGISTs using DCE is safe and effective. Compared with SCE, DCE had an advantage in terms of operative time, especially in the gastric fundus.Keywords: Double-curved endoscopeendoscopic full-thickness resectiongastrointestinal stromal tumorsfundus Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author (s).Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by Health personnel training project of Soochow (GSWS2020109), and Changshu Science and Technology Project (CS202116).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
嘴嘴发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
丘比特应助苏幕采纳,获得10
1秒前
止兮完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
arniu2008发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
fanfanfan完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
王金金发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
困困鱼发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
Kycg完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
机灵书易发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
伶俐的老四完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
HOME完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
菜虫虫发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
虚拟的柜子完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
FashionBoy应助dagongren采纳,获得10
4秒前
赵辉完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
jy关注了科研通微信公众号
5秒前
999999发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Reachu.Chan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Jasper应助灿灿采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
在水一方应助jfz采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
fanfanfan发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
汉堡包应助Liangyu采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
包容初丹发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
天空之云发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
桐桐应助吴泰霞采纳,获得10
7秒前
YUYUYU完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
yy发布了新的文献求助50
7秒前
高分求助中
Theoretical Modelling of Unbonded Flexible Pipe Cross-Sections 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 880
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
3rd Edition Group Dynamics in Exercise and Sport Psychology New Perspectives Edited By Mark R. Beauchamp, Mark Eys Copyright 2025 600
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
Digital and Social Media Marketing 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5620188
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4704708
关于积分的说明 14929099
捐赠科研通 4761278
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2550838
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1513615
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1474523