正态性检验
统计
单变量
数学
Anderson–Darling测试
正态性
样本量测定
考试(生物学)
卡方检验
统计假设检验
Goldfeld–Quandt测试
皮尔森卡方检定
精确检验
综合测试
Z检验
科尔莫戈洛夫-斯米尔诺夫试验
多元统计
检验统计量
生物
古生物学
出处
期刊:Open Journal of Statistics
[Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.]
日期:2021-01-01
卷期号:11 (01): 113-122
被引量:101
标识
DOI:10.4236/ojs.2021.111006
摘要
In this study, to power comparison test, different univariate normality testing procedures are compared by using new algorithm. Different univariate and multivariate test are also analyzed here. And also review efficient algorithm for calculating the size corrected power of the test which can be used to compare the efficiency of the test. Also to test the randomness of generated random numbers. For this purpose, 1000 data sets with combinations of sample size n = 10, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 100, 200, 300 were generated from uniform distribution and tested by using different tests for randomness. The assessment of normality using statistical tests is sensitive to the sample size. Observed that with the increase of n, overall powers are increased but Shapiro Wilk (SW) test, Shapiro Francia (SF) test and Andeson Darling (AD) test are the most powerful test among other tests. Cramer-Von-Mises (CVM) test performs better than Pearson chi-square, Lilliefors test has better power than Jarque Bera (JB) Test. Jarque Bera (JB) Test is less powerful test among other tests.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI