已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Methodological and reporting quality in non-Cochrane systematic review updates could be improved: a comparative study

系统回顾 医学 质量得分 荟萃分析 梅德林 证据质量 质量(理念) 质量评定 医学物理学 外部质量评估 病理 运营管理 公制(单位) 经济 法学 哲学 认识论 政治学
作者
Ya Gao,Yitong Cai,Kelu Yang,Ming Liu,Sheng Shi,Chen Ji,Yanchun Sun,Fujian Song,Junhua Zhang,Jinhui Tian
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:119: 36-46 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.012
摘要

The aim of the study was to compare the methodological and reporting quality of updated systematic reviews (SRs) and original SRs.We included 30 pairs of non-Cochrane updated and original SRs, identified from a search of PubMed and Embase.com. We used Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) to assess methodological quality and Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for reporting quality. Stratified analyses were conducted to compare the differences between updated SRs and original SRs and explore factors that might affect the degree of quality change.Of the 60 non-Cochrane SRs, only two (3.3%) were of low quality, the remaining 58 (96.7%) were of critical low quality. There were no statistically significant differences in methodological quality between the updated SRs and original SRs, although the compliance rates of eight items of updated SRs were higher than that of original SRs. Updated SRs showed an improvement on 15 PRISMA items, but no items with statistically significant differences. The differences in fully reported AMSTAR-2 and PRISMA items between original SRs and updated SRs were also not statistically significant after adjusting for multiple review characteristics.The methodological and reporting quality of updated SRs were not improved compared with original SRs, although the quality could be further improved for both updated SRs and original SRs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
情怀应助闷声发采纳,获得10
1秒前
Nhkun完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
汉堡包应助veinard采纳,获得10
1秒前
xrl完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
赘婿应助科研小白采纳,获得10
4秒前
所所应助迷人冥王星采纳,获得10
5秒前
任性完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
微笑发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
邱燈发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
dwl完成签到 ,获得积分0
9秒前
10秒前
SciGPT应助伶俐的静柏采纳,获得10
10秒前
Jasper应助xiuxiu采纳,获得10
10秒前
Hello应助微笑采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
乐观的西装完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
大模型应助飘逸剑采纳,获得10
14秒前
Wayne72完成签到,获得积分0
14秒前
niuma发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
木木发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
南希maggie完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
妩媚的夜柳完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
逝水无痕发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
微笑完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
李文强发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
兔雳完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
欧阳大娘完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
LeeY.发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
ding应助玲珑油豆腐采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
SOFT MATTER SERIES Volume 22 Soft Matter in Foods 1000
Zur lokalen Geoidbestimmung aus terrestrischen Messungen vertikaler Schweregradienten 1000
Schifanoia : notizie dell'istituto di studi rinascimentali di Ferrara : 66/67, 1/2, 2024 1000
Circulating tumor DNA from blood and cerebrospinal fluid in DLBCL: simultaneous evaluation of mutations, IG rearrangement, and IG clonality 500
Food Microbiology - An Introduction (5th Edition) 500
Architectural Corrosion and Critical Infrastructure 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4868471
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4159926
关于积分的说明 12900040
捐赠科研通 3914325
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2149797
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1168260
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1070659