Antioxidant treatment to reduce mortality and serious adverse events in adult surgical patients: A systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis

医学 安慰剂 荟萃分析 相对风险 随机对照试验 围手术期 临床试验 不利影响 子群分析 科克伦图书馆 出版偏见 内科学 外科 置信区间 病理 替代医学
作者
Sofie S. Pedersen,Maria Louise Fabritius,Emilie Katrine Kongebro,Christian S. Meyhoff
出处
期刊:Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica [Wiley]
卷期号:65 (4): 438-450 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/aas.13752
摘要

Abstract Background Hyperoxia during anesthesia can increase cellular oxidative stress, and perioperative antioxidant treatment may reduce the resulting damage. The aim of this review was to evaluate risks and benefits of antioxidant treatment in surgical patients. We hypothesized that antioxidant treatment reduced mortality compared to placebo/no intervention. Methods This systematic review with meta‐analyses and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted using Cochrane standards and GRADE methodology. Randomized clinical trials comparing perioperative antioxidant treatment vs. placebo/no intervention in adults were included. Primary outcome was mortality at longest follow‐up. Results Ninety‐seven trials with 8156 patients were included. The most common interventions were N‐Acetylcysteine (36 trials) and vitamin C (29 trials). Trials were primarily performed during cardiac surgery (53 trials). Fifty‐six trials with 4890 patients reported information on mortality (243 events). The meta‐analysis of mortality at longest follow‐up showed a reduced mortality in antioxidant treated patients (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59; 0.94, I 2 0%), however, TSA‐adjusted CI was broadened (0.55‐1.02) and only 31% of the required information size was reached. Furthermore, in the subgroup of three trials with overall low risk of bias the RR for mortality was 1.18 (95% CI 0.39, 3.63). Based on GRADE, our findings are of low quality of evidence due to high risk of bias, imprecision, and indirectness. Conclusion We found a 26% relative risk reduction of mortality in surgical patients treated with antioxidants but the quality of evidence supporting our findings is low and influenced by clinical heterogeneity and high risk of systematic‐ and random errors.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
平淡的雁开应助清爽鼠标采纳,获得10
1秒前
妇产科医生完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
hero_ljw完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
zheyu完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
lily发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
111111完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
八乙基环辛四烯完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
华姝完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
陈永伟完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xdedd完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
姚断天完成签到 ,获得积分20
3秒前
mar完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
佩18093370982完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
金jin完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Percy完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
巴哒完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
盐植物完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
平常莹芝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
brd完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
orixero应助枫叶采纳,获得10
6秒前
千流完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
晴朗完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
刻苦千琴完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
优雅盼海完成签到 ,获得积分20
7秒前
活力山蝶完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
长风完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Amy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
周运完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
xiaoran发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
aurevoir完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
moxuyio发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
激昂的梦山完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
行走的绅士完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
北海完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
在水一方应助听风无涯采纳,获得10
10秒前
perfect完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
Psychology for Teachers 220
On the Validity of the Independent-Particle Model and the Sum-rule Approach to the Deeply Bound States in Nuclei 220
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4598273
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4009452
关于积分的说明 12411277
捐赠科研通 3688841
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2033499
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1066749
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 951856