清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Development and Validation of a Scoring System to Identify Individuals at High Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms Who Should Undergo Colonoscopy Screening

医学 结肠镜检查 结直肠癌 逻辑回归 置信区间 内科学 人口 风险评估 相对风险 癌症 环境卫生 计算机安全 计算机科学
作者
Shasha Tao,Michael Hoffmeister,Hermann Brenner
出处
期刊:Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:12 (3): 478-485 被引量:100
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.042
摘要

Background & AimsScreening the population for colorectal cancer (CRC) by colonoscopy could reduce the disease burden. However, targeted screening of individuals at high risk could increase its cost effectiveness.MethodsWe developed a scoring system to identify individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma, based on easy-to-collect risk factors among 7891 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. The system was validated in an independent sample of 3519 participants. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop the algorithm, and the regression coefficient-based scores were used to determine individual risks. Relative risk and numbers of colonoscopies needed for detecting one or more advanced neoplasm(s) were calculated for quintiles of the risk score. The predictive ability of the scoring system was quantified by the area under the curve.ResultsWe identified 9 risk factors (sex, age, first-degree relatives with a history of CRC, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat consumption, ever regular use [at least 2 times/wk for at least 1 y] of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, previous colonoscopy, and previous detection of polyps) that were associated significantly with risk of advanced neoplasms. The developed score was associated strongly with the presence of advanced neoplasms. In the validation sample, individuals in the highest quintile of scores had a relative risk for advanced neoplasm of 3.86 (95% confidence interval, 2.71–5.49), compared with individuals in the lowest quintile. The number needed to screen to detect 1 or more advanced neoplasm(s) varied from 20 to 5 between quintiles of the risk score. In the validation sample, the scoring system identified patients with CRC or any advanced neoplasm with area under the curve values of 0.68 and 0.66, respectively.ConclusionsWe developed a scoring system, based on easy-to-collect risk factors, to identify individuals most likely to have advanced neoplasms. This system might be used to stratify individuals for CRC screening. Screening the population for colorectal cancer (CRC) by colonoscopy could reduce the disease burden. However, targeted screening of individuals at high risk could increase its cost effectiveness. We developed a scoring system to identify individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma, based on easy-to-collect risk factors among 7891 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. The system was validated in an independent sample of 3519 participants. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop the algorithm, and the regression coefficient-based scores were used to determine individual risks. Relative risk and numbers of colonoscopies needed for detecting one or more advanced neoplasm(s) were calculated for quintiles of the risk score. The predictive ability of the scoring system was quantified by the area under the curve. We identified 9 risk factors (sex, age, first-degree relatives with a history of CRC, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat consumption, ever regular use [at least 2 times/wk for at least 1 y] of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, previous colonoscopy, and previous detection of polyps) that were associated significantly with risk of advanced neoplasms. The developed score was associated strongly with the presence of advanced neoplasms. In the validation sample, individuals in the highest quintile of scores had a relative risk for advanced neoplasm of 3.86 (95% confidence interval, 2.71–5.49), compared with individuals in the lowest quintile. The number needed to screen to detect 1 or more advanced neoplasm(s) varied from 20 to 5 between quintiles of the risk score. In the validation sample, the scoring system identified patients with CRC or any advanced neoplasm with area under the curve values of 0.68 and 0.66, respectively. We developed a scoring system, based on easy-to-collect risk factors, to identify individuals most likely to have advanced neoplasms. This system might be used to stratify individuals for CRC screening.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zz完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
自由飞翔完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
小鱼女侠完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
qhdsyxy完成签到 ,获得积分0
37秒前
欣慰宛筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
顺利的小蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
53秒前
wangye完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
coolplex完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
燕不留声完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
勤奋流沙完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
是述不是沭完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
fan完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
wefor完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
红豆面包发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
乔杰完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
cc完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
3分钟前
大模型应助hp采纳,获得10
3分钟前
4分钟前
ANESTHESIA_XY完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
hp发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
文艺水风完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
沙海沉戈完成签到,获得积分0
4分钟前
淡定的如风完成签到,获得积分20
4分钟前
zuhangzhao完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
NULI完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
jinfu应助淡定的如风采纳,获得20
5分钟前
是风动完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
kenchilie完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
majer完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
tracer完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
103x完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
Will完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
共享精神应助Robert采纳,获得10
6分钟前
研友_LMy6kL完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
Emperor完成签到 ,获得积分0
6分钟前
高分求助中
LNG地下式貯槽指針(JGA指-107) 1000
LNG地上式貯槽指針 (JGA指 ; 108) 1000
Impact of Mitophagy-Related Genes on the Diagnosis and Development of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms 900
QMS18Ed2 | process management. 2nd ed 600
LNG as a marine fuel—Safety and Operational Guidelines - Bunkering 560
Exploring Mitochondrial Autophagy Dysregulation in Osteosarcoma: Its Implications for Prognosis and Targeted Therapy 526
九经直音韵母研究 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2937255
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2593800
关于积分的说明 6985779
捐赠科研通 2237287
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1188186
版权声明 589976
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 581651