Development and Validation of a Scoring System to Identify Individuals at High Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms Who Should Undergo Colonoscopy Screening

医学 结肠镜检查 结直肠癌 逻辑回归 置信区间 内科学 人口 风险评估 相对风险 癌症 环境卫生 计算机安全 计算机科学
作者
Shasha Tao,Michael Hoffmeister,Hermann Brenner
出处
期刊:Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:12 (3): 478-485 被引量:100
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.042
摘要

Background & AimsScreening the population for colorectal cancer (CRC) by colonoscopy could reduce the disease burden. However, targeted screening of individuals at high risk could increase its cost effectiveness.MethodsWe developed a scoring system to identify individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma, based on easy-to-collect risk factors among 7891 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. The system was validated in an independent sample of 3519 participants. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop the algorithm, and the regression coefficient-based scores were used to determine individual risks. Relative risk and numbers of colonoscopies needed for detecting one or more advanced neoplasm(s) were calculated for quintiles of the risk score. The predictive ability of the scoring system was quantified by the area under the curve.ResultsWe identified 9 risk factors (sex, age, first-degree relatives with a history of CRC, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat consumption, ever regular use [at least 2 times/wk for at least 1 y] of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, previous colonoscopy, and previous detection of polyps) that were associated significantly with risk of advanced neoplasms. The developed score was associated strongly with the presence of advanced neoplasms. In the validation sample, individuals in the highest quintile of scores had a relative risk for advanced neoplasm of 3.86 (95% confidence interval, 2.71–5.49), compared with individuals in the lowest quintile. The number needed to screen to detect 1 or more advanced neoplasm(s) varied from 20 to 5 between quintiles of the risk score. In the validation sample, the scoring system identified patients with CRC or any advanced neoplasm with area under the curve values of 0.68 and 0.66, respectively.ConclusionsWe developed a scoring system, based on easy-to-collect risk factors, to identify individuals most likely to have advanced neoplasms. This system might be used to stratify individuals for CRC screening. Screening the population for colorectal cancer (CRC) by colonoscopy could reduce the disease burden. However, targeted screening of individuals at high risk could increase its cost effectiveness. We developed a scoring system to identify individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma, based on easy-to-collect risk factors among 7891 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. The system was validated in an independent sample of 3519 participants. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop the algorithm, and the regression coefficient-based scores were used to determine individual risks. Relative risk and numbers of colonoscopies needed for detecting one or more advanced neoplasm(s) were calculated for quintiles of the risk score. The predictive ability of the scoring system was quantified by the area under the curve. We identified 9 risk factors (sex, age, first-degree relatives with a history of CRC, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat consumption, ever regular use [at least 2 times/wk for at least 1 y] of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, previous colonoscopy, and previous detection of polyps) that were associated significantly with risk of advanced neoplasms. The developed score was associated strongly with the presence of advanced neoplasms. In the validation sample, individuals in the highest quintile of scores had a relative risk for advanced neoplasm of 3.86 (95% confidence interval, 2.71–5.49), compared with individuals in the lowest quintile. The number needed to screen to detect 1 or more advanced neoplasm(s) varied from 20 to 5 between quintiles of the risk score. In the validation sample, the scoring system identified patients with CRC or any advanced neoplasm with area under the curve values of 0.68 and 0.66, respectively. We developed a scoring system, based on easy-to-collect risk factors, to identify individuals most likely to have advanced neoplasms. This system might be used to stratify individuals for CRC screening.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
阿卡布拉发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助魏立翔采纳,获得10
4秒前
何YI发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
星辰大海应助果同学采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
SYLH应助lvfe采纳,获得30
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
居居子发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
丘比特应助公瑾采纳,获得10
10秒前
小女完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Owen应助亲亲亲采纳,获得10
12秒前
友好紊发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Lucas应助沉静的大侠采纳,获得10
13秒前
Ava应助王359采纳,获得10
14秒前
日出发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
乐乐应助日出采纳,获得10
19秒前
研友_n0QYAZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
英俊的铭应助友好紊采纳,获得10
22秒前
哈哈学习学习噢完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
弯弯完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
缪尔岚完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
共享精神应助何YI采纳,获得10
26秒前
亲亲亲完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
张玉关注了科研通微信公众号
28秒前
科研通AI5应助zhangliangliang采纳,获得10
34秒前
36秒前
36秒前
37秒前
40秒前
搜集达人应助辰小七采纳,获得10
42秒前
42秒前
277777发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
bkagyin应助LL采纳,获得10
43秒前
何YI发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
44秒前
45秒前
刘琪发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 104th edition 1000
Density Functional Theory: A Practical Introduction, 2nd Edition 840
J'AI COMBATTU POUR MAO // ANNA WANG 660
Izeltabart tapatansine - AdisInsight 600
Gay and Lesbian Asia 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3757592
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3300765
关于积分的说明 10115053
捐赠科研通 3015238
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1655911
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 790145
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 753611