Development and Validation of a Scoring System to Identify Individuals at High Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms Who Should Undergo Colonoscopy Screening

医学 结肠镜检查 结直肠癌 逻辑回归 置信区间 内科学 人口 风险评估 相对风险 癌症 环境卫生 计算机安全 计算机科学
作者
Shasha Tao,Michael Hoffmeister,Hermann Brenner
出处
期刊:Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:12 (3): 478-485 被引量:100
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.042
摘要

Background & AimsScreening the population for colorectal cancer (CRC) by colonoscopy could reduce the disease burden. However, targeted screening of individuals at high risk could increase its cost effectiveness.MethodsWe developed a scoring system to identify individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma, based on easy-to-collect risk factors among 7891 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. The system was validated in an independent sample of 3519 participants. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop the algorithm, and the regression coefficient-based scores were used to determine individual risks. Relative risk and numbers of colonoscopies needed for detecting one or more advanced neoplasm(s) were calculated for quintiles of the risk score. The predictive ability of the scoring system was quantified by the area under the curve.ResultsWe identified 9 risk factors (sex, age, first-degree relatives with a history of CRC, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat consumption, ever regular use [at least 2 times/wk for at least 1 y] of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, previous colonoscopy, and previous detection of polyps) that were associated significantly with risk of advanced neoplasms. The developed score was associated strongly with the presence of advanced neoplasms. In the validation sample, individuals in the highest quintile of scores had a relative risk for advanced neoplasm of 3.86 (95% confidence interval, 2.71–5.49), compared with individuals in the lowest quintile. The number needed to screen to detect 1 or more advanced neoplasm(s) varied from 20 to 5 between quintiles of the risk score. In the validation sample, the scoring system identified patients with CRC or any advanced neoplasm with area under the curve values of 0.68 and 0.66, respectively.ConclusionsWe developed a scoring system, based on easy-to-collect risk factors, to identify individuals most likely to have advanced neoplasms. This system might be used to stratify individuals for CRC screening. Screening the population for colorectal cancer (CRC) by colonoscopy could reduce the disease burden. However, targeted screening of individuals at high risk could increase its cost effectiveness. We developed a scoring system to identify individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma, based on easy-to-collect risk factors among 7891 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. The system was validated in an independent sample of 3519 participants. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop the algorithm, and the regression coefficient-based scores were used to determine individual risks. Relative risk and numbers of colonoscopies needed for detecting one or more advanced neoplasm(s) were calculated for quintiles of the risk score. The predictive ability of the scoring system was quantified by the area under the curve. We identified 9 risk factors (sex, age, first-degree relatives with a history of CRC, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat consumption, ever regular use [at least 2 times/wk for at least 1 y] of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, previous colonoscopy, and previous detection of polyps) that were associated significantly with risk of advanced neoplasms. The developed score was associated strongly with the presence of advanced neoplasms. In the validation sample, individuals in the highest quintile of scores had a relative risk for advanced neoplasm of 3.86 (95% confidence interval, 2.71–5.49), compared with individuals in the lowest quintile. The number needed to screen to detect 1 or more advanced neoplasm(s) varied from 20 to 5 between quintiles of the risk score. In the validation sample, the scoring system identified patients with CRC or any advanced neoplasm with area under the curve values of 0.68 and 0.66, respectively. We developed a scoring system, based on easy-to-collect risk factors, to identify individuals most likely to have advanced neoplasms. This system might be used to stratify individuals for CRC screening.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
rao发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
77发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
twistzz完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
嘟噜发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
小马甲应助tiny_face采纳,获得10
5秒前
WJ发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科研通AI6.4应助SYX采纳,获得10
8秒前
丘比特应助任性鞋垫采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
可靠白安发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
脑洞疼应助77采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
Aero发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
zho应助隋玉采纳,获得10
13秒前
拼搏盼山完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
飞飞飞发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
在水一方应助可靠白安采纳,获得10
17秒前
初遇之时最暖应助熊猫海采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
专业中药人完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助sun采纳,获得10
18秒前
DueDue0327完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
梨子应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
yjh123应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
伶俐妙海应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
20秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
草莓发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
Lou应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
梨子应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
未寝的怀民完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7254369
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8876344
关于积分的说明 18742101
捐赠科研通 6934908
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3200122
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2374774
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2175037