已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Development and Validation of a Scoring System to Identify Individuals at High Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms Who Should Undergo Colonoscopy Screening

医学 结肠镜检查 结直肠癌 逻辑回归 置信区间 内科学 人口 风险评估 相对风险 癌症 环境卫生 计算机安全 计算机科学
作者
Shasha Tao,Michael Hoffmeister,Hermann Brenner
出处
期刊:Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:12 (3): 478-485 被引量:100
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.042
摘要

Background & AimsScreening the population for colorectal cancer (CRC) by colonoscopy could reduce the disease burden. However, targeted screening of individuals at high risk could increase its cost effectiveness.MethodsWe developed a scoring system to identify individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma, based on easy-to-collect risk factors among 7891 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. The system was validated in an independent sample of 3519 participants. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop the algorithm, and the regression coefficient-based scores were used to determine individual risks. Relative risk and numbers of colonoscopies needed for detecting one or more advanced neoplasm(s) were calculated for quintiles of the risk score. The predictive ability of the scoring system was quantified by the area under the curve.ResultsWe identified 9 risk factors (sex, age, first-degree relatives with a history of CRC, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat consumption, ever regular use [at least 2 times/wk for at least 1 y] of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, previous colonoscopy, and previous detection of polyps) that were associated significantly with risk of advanced neoplasms. The developed score was associated strongly with the presence of advanced neoplasms. In the validation sample, individuals in the highest quintile of scores had a relative risk for advanced neoplasm of 3.86 (95% confidence interval, 2.71–5.49), compared with individuals in the lowest quintile. The number needed to screen to detect 1 or more advanced neoplasm(s) varied from 20 to 5 between quintiles of the risk score. In the validation sample, the scoring system identified patients with CRC or any advanced neoplasm with area under the curve values of 0.68 and 0.66, respectively.ConclusionsWe developed a scoring system, based on easy-to-collect risk factors, to identify individuals most likely to have advanced neoplasms. This system might be used to stratify individuals for CRC screening. Screening the population for colorectal cancer (CRC) by colonoscopy could reduce the disease burden. However, targeted screening of individuals at high risk could increase its cost effectiveness. We developed a scoring system to identify individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma, based on easy-to-collect risk factors among 7891 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. The system was validated in an independent sample of 3519 participants. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop the algorithm, and the regression coefficient-based scores were used to determine individual risks. Relative risk and numbers of colonoscopies needed for detecting one or more advanced neoplasm(s) were calculated for quintiles of the risk score. The predictive ability of the scoring system was quantified by the area under the curve. We identified 9 risk factors (sex, age, first-degree relatives with a history of CRC, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat consumption, ever regular use [at least 2 times/wk for at least 1 y] of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, previous colonoscopy, and previous detection of polyps) that were associated significantly with risk of advanced neoplasms. The developed score was associated strongly with the presence of advanced neoplasms. In the validation sample, individuals in the highest quintile of scores had a relative risk for advanced neoplasm of 3.86 (95% confidence interval, 2.71–5.49), compared with individuals in the lowest quintile. The number needed to screen to detect 1 or more advanced neoplasm(s) varied from 20 to 5 between quintiles of the risk score. In the validation sample, the scoring system identified patients with CRC or any advanced neoplasm with area under the curve values of 0.68 and 0.66, respectively. We developed a scoring system, based on easy-to-collect risk factors, to identify individuals most likely to have advanced neoplasms. This system might be used to stratify individuals for CRC screening.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
谢峥嵘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
郎治宇完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
张包子完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
11秒前
星辰大海应助爱吃酥饼采纳,获得10
12秒前
迷途发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
美好黑猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
拔萝卜鸭完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
lx33101128发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
完美世界应助nav采纳,获得10
18秒前
科研通AI2S应助啦啦啦采纳,获得10
18秒前
七月发布了新的文献求助20
20秒前
思源应助煞笔导去死啊采纳,获得10
20秒前
Orange应助迷途采纳,获得10
21秒前
24秒前
天天快乐应助Aria_chao采纳,获得10
29秒前
闾丘笑卉发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
29秒前
支问凝发布了新的文献求助20
30秒前
机灵的青雪完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
llll完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
清脆的飞丹完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
33秒前
绿油枸枸发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
Hosea发布了新的文献求助30
35秒前
CipherSage应助符水采纳,获得10
36秒前
37秒前
KETU发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
37秒前
37秒前
38秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3146415
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2797811
关于积分的说明 7825766
捐赠科研通 2454165
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1306196
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627666
版权声明 601503