检查表
奇纳
答辩人
定性研究
数据收集
背景(考古学)
研究设计
焦点小组
定性性质
心理学
梅德林
医学教育
应用心理学
医学
计算机科学
护理部
社会学
认知心理学
法学
古生物学
机器学习
生物
社会科学
心理干预
人类学
政治学
作者
Allison Tong,Peter Sainsbury,Jonathan C. Craig
出处
期刊:International Journal for Quality in Health Care
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2007-09-15
卷期号:19 (6): 349-357
被引量:25960
标识
DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
摘要
Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design.To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups).We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed.Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting.The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI