SAPS III is superior to SOFA for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients based on Sepsis 3.0 criteria

医学 沙发评分 败血症 内科学 重症监护医学 急诊医学
作者
Youfeng Zhu,Rui Zhang,Xiaoling Ye,Houqiang Liu,Jianrui Wei
出处
期刊:International Journal of Infectious Diseases [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:114: 135-141 被引量:37
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.015
摘要

The discrimination and calibration accuracy of prediction models tends to become poor over time. The performance of predictive models should be reevaluated periodically. The aim of this study was to reassess the discrimination of the six commonly used models for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis based on the Sepsis 3.0 criteria.Patient data were extracted from the fourth edition of the Medical Information Mart for Critical Care (MIMIC IV) database. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS), Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and III (SAPS III) scores were calculated and collected. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the discrimination abilities of the models using non-parametric Wilcoxon statistics. The Delong method was used to perform pairwise comparisons of the AUROCs of the models. Multiple subgroup analyses for age, body mass index, and sex were performed with regard to the 28-day mortality prediction of the models.A total of 12 691 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 65.97 ± 15.77 years; 7673 patients (60.50%) were male. The mean SIRS, SOFA, OASIS, SAPS II, LODS, and SAPS III scores were higher in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group. The discrimination for 28-day mortality with the SAPS III (AUROC 0.812, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.802-0.822) and LODS (AUROC 0.804, 95% CI 0.743-0.765) models was superior to that of the SIRS (AUROC 0.575, 95% CI 0.562-0.589), SOFA (AUROC 0.612, 95% CI 0.598-0.626), OASIS (AUROC 0.753, 95% CI 0.742-0.764), and SAPS II (AUROC 0.754, 95% CI 0.743-0.765) models. The Youden index of the SAPS III model was 0.484, which was the highest among the models. Subgroup analyses showed similar results to the overall results.The discrimination for 28-day mortality with the SAPS III and LODS models was superior to that of the SIRS, SOFA, OASIS, and SAPS II models. The SAPS III model showed the best discrimination capacity for 28-day mortality compared with the other models.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
luoyi发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
汉堡包的应助被安详的觅风采纳,获得10
2秒前
ZHXR完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
PY完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
思源的应助被Cytosol采纳,获得30
3秒前
可爱的函函的应助被KayneJia采纳,获得10
4秒前
拼搏忆文发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
墨1234lr完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
SWAGGER123发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
梧桐雨210完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
Moose发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
懒羊羊的忠实粉丝的应助被LRQ采纳,获得20
7秒前
柚子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
fanzhang完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
稀松发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
illi完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
今后的应助被32采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
小库里2025发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Akim的应助被icymars采纳,获得10
11秒前
shuailee发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
打打的应助被kevin采纳,获得10
12秒前
科目三的应助被博弈采纳,获得10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被HTA纠结采纳,获得10
13秒前
李健的应助被洋葱冲冲冲采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
wanci的应助被李洁采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
刘永海发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
sunny完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry IV (4th Edition) 800
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
A REVIEW OF THE V-22 DYNAMICS VALIDATION PROGRAM 600
Les Mots du discours 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8120578
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9525386
关于积分的说明 21556019
捐赠科研通 7699117
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3415151
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2540955
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2455411