Medical and Endovascular Treatments for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis

医学 冲程(发动机) 荟萃分析 神经学 内科学 血管成形术 优势比 神经外科 狭窄 外科 机械工程 精神科 工程类
作者
Guangge Peng,Kangyue Li,Shouling Wu,Xue Tian,Zhongqi Qi,Shuo Li,Xu Tong,Yiming Deng,Xuan Sun,Zhongrong Miao
出处
期刊:Translational Stroke Research [Springer Nature]
卷期号:14 (1): 83-93 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1007/s12975-021-00957-7
摘要

Medical treatment and endovascular therapy are widely used for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, but the best treatment strategy remains uncertain. The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of medical treatment, stenting, and primary balloon angioplasty (PBA). We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for trials comparing these three treatments for intracranial stenosis up to December 24, 2020. We performed a network meta-analysis with random-effects models. The primary outcome was any stroke or death during a long-term follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death. This network meta-analysis included 14 trials with 1520 participants. No significant difference was found between the three groups in the primary outcome, while PBA was probably the best treatment according to the ranking plot. Medical treatment had significantly lower rate of any stroke or death (odds ratio (OR), 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.56), ischemic stroke (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.81), and intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.71) within 30 days than stenting but did not differ from PBA. The ranking plot demonstrated that PBA was also most likely to rank the highest for ischemic stroke during the long-term follow-up and beyond 30 days, although no significant difference was identified. Medical treatment had lower risk of any stroke or death within 30 days than stenting but did not differ from PBA. All the treatments had similar effects on the prevention of long-term stroke, while PBA had the highest probability of being the most effective.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
清爽的梦菡完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Lesile发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
乐观的雅青完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
杰尼龟发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
岁月荣耀发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
save发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
rl完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
西柚发布了新的文献求助60
3秒前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
mao完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
要吃烧饼么完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Lesile完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
xianyulai完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
芈冖完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
tangzl完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
yhliu发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
zpf应助阿利呀采纳,获得30
12秒前
12秒前
乐乐发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
12秒前
Herly发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
大胆盼兰发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
雨眠发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
自然的白竹应助杜杜采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in ’Tides Chemistry 2000
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 2000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 810
Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 3: Primates 805
Ethnicities: Media, Health, and Coping 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3073445
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2727003
关于积分的说明 7497465
捐赠科研通 2375088
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1259304
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 610574
版权声明 597075