Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data

医学 地高辛 观察研究 荟萃分析 置信区间 内科学 科克伦图书馆 安慰剂 相对风险 随机对照试验 梅德林 倾向得分匹配 严格标准化平均差 心力衰竭 替代医学 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Oliver J. Ziff,Deirdre A. Lane,Monica Samra,Michael Griffith,Paulus Kirchhof,Gregory Y.H. Lip,Richard P. Steeds,John Townend,Dipak Kotecha
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.h4451
摘要

Objective To clarify the impact of digoxin on death and clinical outcomes across all observational and randomised controlled trials, accounting for study designs and methods. Data sources and study selection Comprehensive literature search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, reference lists, and ongoing studies according to a prospectively registered design (PROSPERO: CRD42014010783), including all studies published from 1960 to July 2014 that examined treatment with digoxin compared with control (placebo or no treatment). Data extraction and synthesis Unadjusted and adjusted data pooled according to study design, analysis method, and risk of bias. Main outcome measures Primary outcome (all cause mortality) and secondary outcomes (including admission to hospital) were meta-analysed with random effects modelling. Results 52 studies were systematically reviewed, comprising 621 845 patients. Digoxin users were 2.4 years older than control (weighted difference 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 3.6), with lower ejection fraction (33% v 42%), more diabetes, and greater use of diuretics and anti-arrhythmic drugs. Meta-analysis included 75 study analyses, with a combined total of 4 006 210 patient years of follow-up. Compared with control, the pooled risk ratio for death with digoxin was 1.76 in unadjusted analyses (1.57 to 1.97), 1.61 in adjusted analyses (1.31 to 1.97), 1.18 in propensity matched studies (1.09 to 1.26), and 0.99 in randomised controlled trials (0.93 to 1.05). Meta-regression confirmed that baseline differences between treatment groups had a significant impact on mortality associated with digoxin, including markers of heart failure severity such as use of diuretics (P=0.004). Studies with better methods and lower risk of bias were more likely to report a neutral association of digoxin with mortality (P<0.001). Across all study types, digoxin led to a small but significant reduction in all cause hospital admission (risk ratio 0.92, 0.89 to 0.95; P<0.001; n=29 525). Conclusions Digoxin is associated with a neutral effect on mortality in randomised trials and a lower rate of admissions to hospital across all study types. Regardless of statistical analysis, prescription biases limit the value of observational data.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
BowieHuang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
BowieHuang应助三十三天采纳,获得10
1秒前
鞭霆发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
海洋完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
3秒前
XLC发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Lucas应助夏小安采纳,获得10
5秒前
zyn发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
雨点发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
明亮白山发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
燕儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
慕青应助堪曼凝采纳,获得10
7秒前
彩虹海完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
Wind发布了新的文献求助50
9秒前
9秒前
LJY发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Yry发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
整齐棉花糖完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Vivian_Zhang应助keyantong采纳,获得10
11秒前
hanzhiyuxing发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
风清扬发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
mole发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
支舟发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
华仔应助光亮的太阳采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
醉熏的红酒完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
周欣玙发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
化妆品原料学 1000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 1000
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
nephSAP® Nephrology Self-Assessment Program - Hypertension The American Society of Nephrology 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5632506
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4727031
关于积分的说明 14982275
捐赠科研通 4790442
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2558305
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1518683
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1479145