Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Are Effective Predictors of Prognosis in Patients with Acute Mesenteric Arterial Embolism and Thrombosis

Background The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been shown to be valuable prognostic markers for a variety of pathological conditions including solid tumors, sepsis, and others. However, the prognostic values of the NLR and PLR in patients with acute mesenteric arterial embolism (AMAE) and acute mesenteric arterial thrombosis (AMAT) have not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of the NLR and PLR for poor prognosis in patients with AMAE and AMAT. Methods A total of 137 patients with AMAE (n = 77) or AMAT (n = 60) were divided into a poor outcome group (cases of intestinal necrosis or death) and a better outcome group (cases without intestinal necrosis who survived successfully), according to prognosis. Neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts were recorded before pharmacotherapy or surgery. The NLR and PLR were calculated, and logistic regression analysis was performed to test their prognostic values. Results The cutoff values for NLR and PLR were 11.05 and 156.26, respectively. The PLR was linearly associated with the NLR (R = 0.769, P < 0.001). NLR (odds ratio [OR] = 6.835, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.282–20.469, P = 0.001), PLR (OR = 4.871, 95% CI = 1.627–14.587, P = 0.005), and coronary heart disease (OR = 3.388, 95% CI = 1.156–9.929, P = 0.026) were found to be independent prognostic factors for the patients. Conclusions NLR ≥ 11.05, PLR ≥ 156.26, and coronary heart disease were shown to be risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with AMAE and AMAT. According to these factors, patients can be divided into 3 prognostic groups: good, NLR < 11.05 with PLR < 156.26; moderate, NLR < 11.05 with PLR ≥ 156.26 or NLR ≥ 11.05 with PLR < 156.26; and poor, NLR ≥ 11.05 with PLR ≥ 156.26. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been shown to be valuable prognostic markers for a variety of pathological conditions including solid tumors, sepsis, and others. However, the prognostic values of the NLR and PLR in patients with acute mesenteric arterial embolism (AMAE) and acute mesenteric arterial thrombosis (AMAT) have not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of the NLR and PLR for poor prognosis in patients with AMAE and AMAT. A total of 137 patients with AMAE (n = 77) or AMAT (n = 60) were divided into a poor outcome group (cases of intestinal necrosis or death) and a better outcome group (cases without intestinal necrosis who survived successfully), according to prognosis. Neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts were recorded before pharmacotherapy or surgery. The NLR and PLR were calculated, and logistic regression analysis was performed to test their prognostic values. The cutoff values for NLR and PLR were 11.05 and 156.26, respectively. The PLR was linearly associated with the NLR (R = 0.769, P < 0.001). NLR (odds ratio [OR] = 6.835, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.282–20.469, P = 0.001), PLR (OR = 4.871, 95% CI = 1.627–14.587, P = 0.005), and coronary heart disease (OR = 3.388, 95% CI = 1.156–9.929, P = 0.026) were found to be independent prognostic factors for the patients. NLR ≥ 11.05, PLR ≥ 156.26, and coronary heart disease were shown to be risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with AMAE and AMAT. According to these factors, patients can be divided into 3 prognostic groups: good, NLR < 11.05 with PLR < 156.26; moderate, NLR < 11.05 with PLR ≥ 156.26 or NLR ≥ 11.05 with PLR < 156.26; and poor, NLR ≥ 11.05 with PLR ≥ 156.26.