危险系数
萧条(经济学)
纵向研究
比例危险模型
队列
队列研究
人口学
心理学
老年学
人口
置信区间
医学
内科学
经济
宏观经济学
病理
社会学
作者
Jaehyeong Cho,Tae Hyeon Kim,Jiyeon Oh,Sooji Lee,Kyeongeun Kim,Jaeyu Park,Hyesu Jo,Yi Deun Jeong,Seoyoung Park,Yejun Son,Nicola Veronese,Guillermo F. López Sánchez,Louis Jacob,Selin Woo,Dong Keon Yon,Lee Smith
标识
DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbaf036
摘要
Abstract Background While greater social engagement is often associated with a reduced risk of depression, longitudinal studies that account for diverse social structures and cultural contexts among middle-aged or older are limited. Methods This study utilized cohort data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n=11,174; 2006-2020) in South Korea (KR), the Health and Retirement Study (n=42,405; 2004-2019) in the US, and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n=28,624; 2002-2019) in the UK, including a total of 29,378 individuals from the population aged ≥45 years. Social engagement frequency was categorized into infrequent, intermediate, and frequent, with changes classified as unchanged, increased, or decreased. The primary outcome was the onset of depression, assessed using the CES-D Scale. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results In the KR cohort, increased social engagement significantly reduced depression risk only in the infrequent group (KR: HR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.14-0.28]). However, decreased social engagement elevated depression risk in both the intermediate group (KR: 6.92 [3.73-12.83]; US: 1.44 [1.16-1.79]) and the frequent group (KR: 1.50 [1.30-1.74]; US: 1.24 [1.13-1.38]). Conversely, in the UK cohort, increased social engagement raised depression risk in the infrequent group (UK: 1.35 [1.01-1.79]) and intermediate group (UK: 1.63 [1.17-2.27]), while decreased engagement lowered depression risk only in the frequent group (UK: 0.80 [0.71-0.90]). Discussion We observed notable national variations in the association between social engagement and depression risk, influenced by cultural and political differences.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI