First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension

医学 噻嗪 血压 利尿剂 抗高血压药 不利影响 心力衰竭 安慰剂 内科学 毒品类别 利尿剂 重症监护医学 心脏病学 药品 药理学 病理 替代医学
作者
Marcia Reinhart,Lorri Puil,Douglas M Salzwedel,James M Wright
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2023 (7) 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd008161.pub3
摘要

Different first-line drug classes for patients with hypertension are often assumed to have similar effectiveness with respect to reducing mortality and morbidity outcomes, and lowering blood pressure. First-line low-dose thiazide diuretics have been previously shown to have the best mortality and morbidity evidence when compared with placebo or no treatment. Head-to-head comparisons of thiazides with other blood pressure-lowering drug classes would demonstrate whether there are important differences.To compare the effects of first-line diuretic drugs with other individual first-line classes of antihypertensive drugs on mortality, morbidity, and withdrawals due to adverse effects in patients with hypertension. Secondary objectives included assessments of the need for added drugs, drug switching, and blood pressure-lowering.Cochrane Hypertension's Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Hypertension Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registers to March 2021. We also checked references and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. A top-up search of the Specialized Register was carried out in June 2022.Randomized active comparator trials of at least one year's duration were included. Trials had a clearly defined intervention arm of a first-line diuretic (thiazide, thiazide-like, or loop diuretic) compared to another first-line drug class: beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, alpha adrenergic blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, direct renin inhibitors, or other antihypertensive drug classes. Studies had to include clearly defined mortality and morbidity outcomes (serious adverse events, total cardiovascular events, stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD), congestive heart failure, and withdrawals due to adverse effects).We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures.We included 20 trials with 26 comparator arms randomizing over 90,000 participants. The findings are relevant to first-line use of drug classes in older male and female hypertensive patients (aged 50 to 75) with multiple co-morbidities, including type 2 diabetes. First-line thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics were compared with beta-blockers (six trials), calcium channel blockers (eight trials), ACE inhibitors (five trials), and alpha-adrenergic blockers (three trials); other comparators included angiotensin II receptor blockers, aliskiren (a direct renin inhibitor), and clonidine (a centrally acting drug). Only three studies reported data for total serious adverse events: two studies compared diuretics with calcium channel blockers and one with a direct renin inhibitor. Compared to first-line beta-blockers, first-line thiazides probably result in little to no difference in total mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.10; 5 trials, 18,241 participants; moderate-certainty), probably reduce total cardiovascular events (5.4% versus 4.8%; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00; 4 trials, 18,135 participants; absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.6%, moderate-certainty), may result in little to no difference in stroke (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.09; 4 trials, 18,135 participants; low-certainty), CHD (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.07; 4 trials, 18,135 participants; low-certainty), or heart failure (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.19; 1 trial, 6569 participants; low-certainty), and probably reduce withdrawals due to adverse effects (10.1% versus 7.9%; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.85; 5 trials, 18,501 participants; ARR 2.2%; moderate-certainty). Compared to first-line calcium channel blockers, first-line thiazides probably result in little to no difference in total mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.08; 7 trials, 35,417 participants; moderate-certainty), may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.24; 2 trials, 7204 participants; low-certainty), probably reduce total cardiovascular events (14.3% versus 13.3%; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98; 6 trials, 35,217 participants; ARR 1.0%; moderate-certainty), probably result in little to no difference in stroke (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.18; 6 trials, 35,217 participants; moderate-certainty) or CHD (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.08; 6 trials, 35,217 participants; moderate-certainty), probably reduce heart failure (4.4% versus 3.2%; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.82; 6 trials, 35,217 participants; ARR 1.2%; moderate-certainty), and may reduce withdrawals due to adverse effects (7.6% versus 6.2%; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.88; 7 trials, 33,908 participants; ARR 1.4%; low-certainty). Compared to first-line ACE inhibitors, first-line thiazides probably result in little to no difference in total mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.07; 3 trials, 30,961 participants; moderate-certainty), may result in little to no difference in total cardiovascular events (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.02; 3 trials, 30,900 participants; low-certainty), probably reduce stroke slightly (4.7% versus 4.1%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99; 3 trials, 30,900 participants; ARR 0.6%; moderate-certainty), probably result in little to no difference in CHD (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.12; 3 trials, 30,900 participants; moderate-certainty) or heart failure (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.04; 2 trials, 30,392 participants; moderate-certainty), and probably reduce withdrawals due to adverse effects (3.9% versus 2.9%; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.84; 3 trials, 25,254 participants; ARR 1.0%; moderate-certainty). Compared to first-line alpha-blockers, first-line thiazides probably result in little to no difference in total mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09; 1 trial, 24,316 participants; moderate-certainty), probably reduce total cardiovascular events (12.1% versus 9.0%; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.80; 2 trials, 24,396 participants; ARR 3.1%; moderate-certainty) and stroke (2.7% versus 2.3%; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01; 2 trials, 24,396 participants; ARR 0.4%; moderate-certainty), may result in little to no difference in CHD (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.11; 2 trials, 24,396 participants; low-certainty), probably reduce heart failure (5.4% versus 2.8%; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.58; 1 trial, 24,316 participants; ARR 2.6%; moderate-certainty), and may reduce withdrawals due to adverse effects (1.3% versus 0.9%; RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.89; 3 trials, 24,772 participants; ARR 0.4%; low-certainty). For the other drug classes, data were insufficient. No antihypertensive drug class demonstrated any clinically important advantages over first-line thiazides.When used as first-line agents for the treatment of hypertension, thiazides and thiazide-like drugs likely do not change total mortality and likely decrease some morbidity outcomes such as cardiovascular events and withdrawals due to adverse effects, when compared to beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, and alpha-blockers.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
电闪完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
小北完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
YH完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
跳跃的惮完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
whatever完成签到,获得积分0
2秒前
心灵的守望完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
aq22完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
白桃乌龙完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
lailai完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
93发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
188完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
WRB完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
skysleeper完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Owen应助kxx采纳,获得10
5秒前
xiumei1998完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
单纯访枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
小团子完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
QJL完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
妮妮完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Yi发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
wuhao完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
巴拿拿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
千早爱音应助zeng采纳,获得10
8秒前
嘿嘿完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
zx完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
柒柒完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
UJS_2022完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
如果有一天我不在树在完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
vax完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
fbwg完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
一路向北完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
执意完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
skepticalsnails完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
大大蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
阿洁发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
高分求助中
Handbook of Fuel Cells, 6 Volume Set 1666
Floxuridine; Third Edition 1000
Tracking and Data Fusion: A Handbook of Algorithms 1000
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 800
消化器内視鏡関連の偶発症に関する第7回全国調査報告2019〜2021年までの3年間 500
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 500
Framing China: Media Images and Political Debates in Britain, the USA and Switzerland, 1900-1950 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 内科学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 冶金 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2860802
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2465871
关于积分的说明 6684494
捐赠科研通 2157114
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1145935
版权声明 585087
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 563114