医学
SMARCB1型
内科学
非典型畸胎样横纹肌瘤
耐受性
肿瘤科
临床终点
人口
SMARCA4型
无进展生存期
不利影响
临床试验
免疫组织化学
化疗
染色质重塑
环境卫生
生物
DNA
染色质
遗传学
作者
Susan Chi,Joanna Yi,P. Mickey Williams,Sinchita Roy‐Chowdhuri,David Patton,Brent Coffey,Joel M. Reid,Jin Piao,Lauren Saguilig,Todd A. Alonzo,Stacey L. Berg,Nilsa C. Ramirez,Alok Jaju,Joyce Mhlanga,Elizabeth Fox,Douglas S. Hawkins,Margaret Mooney,Naoko Takebe,James V. Tricoli,Katherine A. Janeway,Nita L. Seibel,D. Williams Parsons
摘要
Abstract Background National Cancer Institute-Children’s Oncology Group Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice assigns patients aged 1-21 years with refractory solid tumors, brain tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase II trials of molecularly targeted therapies based on detection of predefined genetic alterations. Patients whose tumors harbored EZH2 mutations or loss of SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 by immunohistochemistry were treated with EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat. Methods Patients received tazemetostat for 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (max 26 cycles). The primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and tolerability of tazemetostat. Results Twenty patients (median age = 5 years) enrolled, all evaluable for response and toxicities. The most frequent diagnoses were atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (n = 8) and malignant rhabdoid tumor (n = 4). Actionable alterations consisted of SMARCB1 loss (n = 16), EZH2 mutation (n = 3), and SMARCA4 loss (n = 1). One objective response was observed in a patient with non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis with SMARCA4 loss (26 cycles, 1200 mg/m2/dose twice daily). Four patients with SMARCB1 loss had a best response of stable disease: epithelioid sarcoma (n = 2), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (n = 1), and renal medullary carcinoma (n = 1). Six-month progression-free survival was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.7% to 55.2%) and 6-month overall survival was 45% (95% CI = 23.1% to 64.7%). Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with prior tazemetostat reports. Conclusions Although tazemetostat did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint in this population of refractory pediatric tumors (objective response rate = 5%, 90% CI = 1% to 20%), 25% of patients with multiple histologic diagnoses experienced prolonged stable disease of 6 months and over (range = 9-26 cycles), suggesting a potential effect of tazemetostat on disease stabilization.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI