Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

医学 安慰剂 可视模拟标度 四分位间距 随机对照试验 慢性疼痛 物理疗法 梅德林 类阿片 奇纳 麻醉 内科学 替代医学 病理 受体 法学 精神科 心理干预 政治学
作者
Jason W. Busse,Li Wang,Mostafa Kamaleldin,Samantha Craigie,John J. Riva,Luis Montoya,Sohail Mulla,Luciane Cruz Lopes,Nicole Vogel,Eric Chen,Karin Kirmayr,Kyle De Oliveira,Lori Olivieri,Alka Kaushal,Luis Enrique Chaparro,Inna Oyberman,Arnav Agarwal,Rachel Couban,Ludwig Tsoi,Tommy Lam,Per Olav Vandvik,Sandy Hsu,Małgorzata M Bała,Stefan Schandelmaier,Anne Scheidecker,Shanil Ebrahim,Vahid Ashoorion,Yasir Rehman,Patrick Jiho Hong,Stephanie Ross,Bradley C. Johnston,Regina Kunz,Xin Sun,Norman Buckley,Daniel I. Sessler,Gordon Guyatt
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:320 (23): 2448-2448 被引量:489
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2018.18472
摘要

Harms and benefits of opioids for chronic noncancer pain remain unclear.To systematically review randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain.The databases of CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, AMED, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to April 2018 for RCTs of opioids for chronic noncancer pain vs any nonopioid control.Paired reviewers independently extracted data. The analyses used random-effects models and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to rate the quality of the evidence.The primary outcomes were pain intensity (score range, 0-10 cm on a visual analog scale for pain; lower is better and the minimally important difference [MID] is 1 cm), physical functioning (score range, 0-100 points on the 36-item Short Form physical component score [SF-36 PCS]; higher is better and the MID is 5 points), and incidence of vomiting.Ninety-six RCTs including 26 169 participants (61% female; median age, 58 years [interquartile range, 51-61 years]) were included. Of the included studies, there were 25 trials of neuropathic pain, 32 trials of nociceptive pain, 33 trials of central sensitization (pain present in the absence of tissue damage), and 6 trials of mixed types of pain. Compared with placebo, opioid use was associated with reduced pain (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.69 cm [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.56 cm] on a 10-cm visual analog scale for pain; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 11.9% [95% CI, 9.7% to 14.1%]), improved physical functioning (WMD, 2.04 points [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.68 points] on the 100-point SF-36 PCS; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 8.5% [95% CI, 5.9% to 11.2%]), and increased vomiting (5.9% with opioids vs 2.3% with placebo for trials that excluded patients with adverse events during a run-in period). Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggested similar associations of opioids with improvements in pain and physical functioning compared with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (pain: WMD, -0.60 cm [95% CI, -1.54 to 0.34 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -0.90 points [95% CI, -2.69 to 0.89 points]), tricyclic antidepressants (pain: WMD, -0.13 cm [95% CI, -0.99 to 0.74 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -5.31 points [95% CI, -13.77 to 3.14 points]), and anticonvulsants (pain: WMD, -0.90 cm [95% CI, -1.65 to -0.14 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, 0.45 points [95% CI, -5.77 to 6.66 points]).In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with chronic noncancer pain, evidence from high-quality studies showed that opioid use was associated with statistically significant but small improvements in pain and physical functioning, and increased risk of vomiting compared with placebo. Comparisons of opioids with nonopioid alternatives suggested that the benefit for pain and functioning may be similar, although the evidence was from studies of only low to moderate quality.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
FR给光亮雪兰的求助进行了留言
刚刚
1秒前
Jasper应助GAO采纳,获得10
1秒前
向连虎完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
maodoudou完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
1024完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Xbro发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
戴遇好完成签到 ,获得积分0
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
亮laiy完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
不是省油的灯完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
HCL发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Am发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
愉快书琴完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Distance发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
叶子发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
泡面完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
parrowxg完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
亮laiy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
震动的忆雪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
带头大哥应助科研通管家采纳,获得200
8秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
向连虎发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
思源应助roy采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
星辰大海应助Xbro采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Le dégorgement réflexe des Acridiens 800
Defense against predation 800
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3134447
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2785391
关于积分的说明 7771957
捐赠科研通 2441024
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1297678
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625042
版权声明 600813