Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

医学 安慰剂 可视模拟标度 四分位间距 随机对照试验 慢性疼痛 物理疗法 梅德林 类阿片 奇纳 麻醉 内科学 替代医学 受体 病理 精神科 政治学 心理干预 法学
作者
Jason W. Busse,Li Wang,Mostafa Kamaleldin,Samantha Craigie,John J. Riva,Luis Montoya,Sohail Mulla,Luciane Cruz Lopes,Nicole Vogel,Eric Chen,Karin Kirmayr,Kyle De Oliveira,Lori Olivieri,Alka Kaushal,Luis Enrique Chaparro,Inna Oyberman,Arnav Agarwal,Rachel Couban,Ludwig Tsoi,Tommy Lam,Per Olav Vandvik,Sandy Hsu,Małgorzata M Bała,Stefan Schandelmaier,Anne Scheidecker,Shanil Ebrahim,Vahid Ashoorion,Yasir Rehman,Patrick Jiho Hong,Stephanie Ross,Bradley C. Johnston,Regina Kunz,Xin Sun,Norman Buckley,Daniel I. Sessler,Gordon Guyatt
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:320 (23): 2448-2448 被引量:489
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2018.18472
摘要

Harms and benefits of opioids for chronic noncancer pain remain unclear.To systematically review randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain.The databases of CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, AMED, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to April 2018 for RCTs of opioids for chronic noncancer pain vs any nonopioid control.Paired reviewers independently extracted data. The analyses used random-effects models and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to rate the quality of the evidence.The primary outcomes were pain intensity (score range, 0-10 cm on a visual analog scale for pain; lower is better and the minimally important difference [MID] is 1 cm), physical functioning (score range, 0-100 points on the 36-item Short Form physical component score [SF-36 PCS]; higher is better and the MID is 5 points), and incidence of vomiting.Ninety-six RCTs including 26 169 participants (61% female; median age, 58 years [interquartile range, 51-61 years]) were included. Of the included studies, there were 25 trials of neuropathic pain, 32 trials of nociceptive pain, 33 trials of central sensitization (pain present in the absence of tissue damage), and 6 trials of mixed types of pain. Compared with placebo, opioid use was associated with reduced pain (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.69 cm [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.56 cm] on a 10-cm visual analog scale for pain; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 11.9% [95% CI, 9.7% to 14.1%]), improved physical functioning (WMD, 2.04 points [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.68 points] on the 100-point SF-36 PCS; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 8.5% [95% CI, 5.9% to 11.2%]), and increased vomiting (5.9% with opioids vs 2.3% with placebo for trials that excluded patients with adverse events during a run-in period). Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggested similar associations of opioids with improvements in pain and physical functioning compared with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (pain: WMD, -0.60 cm [95% CI, -1.54 to 0.34 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -0.90 points [95% CI, -2.69 to 0.89 points]), tricyclic antidepressants (pain: WMD, -0.13 cm [95% CI, -0.99 to 0.74 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -5.31 points [95% CI, -13.77 to 3.14 points]), and anticonvulsants (pain: WMD, -0.90 cm [95% CI, -1.65 to -0.14 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, 0.45 points [95% CI, -5.77 to 6.66 points]).In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with chronic noncancer pain, evidence from high-quality studies showed that opioid use was associated with statistically significant but small improvements in pain and physical functioning, and increased risk of vomiting compared with placebo. Comparisons of opioids with nonopioid alternatives suggested that the benefit for pain and functioning may be similar, although the evidence was from studies of only low to moderate quality.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zlovej完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
纪震宇发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助bbking采纳,获得10
1秒前
ALKUT发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
qw完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科研通AI6应助跳跃的访琴采纳,获得10
2秒前
开朗嵩发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
漂亮的哈密瓜完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
LaTeXer应助ZZ采纳,获得30
4秒前
JINtian发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
深情安青应助Hwj采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
小透明应助凶狠的丹琴采纳,获得50
6秒前
sy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Owen应助小羊皮革采纳,获得10
6秒前
天天快乐应助三岁半采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研通AI6应助shanp采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
kingwill举报小小求助涉嫌违规
8秒前
9秒前
hrbykdxly发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
沐风发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
科研界的滂菜完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
11秒前
Hemingwayway发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
在水一方应助ic采纳,获得10
12秒前
科目三应助一只兔子采纳,获得10
12秒前
现代千青完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
15秒前
沐沐完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
杨阳发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
李爱国应助积极的老鼠采纳,获得10
15秒前
沉静丹寒发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
ding应助李lll采纳,获得10
16秒前
JINtian发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Mechanics of Solids with Applications to Thin Bodies 5000
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5599277
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4684870
关于积分的说明 14836779
捐赠科研通 4667525
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2537885
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1505359
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1470776