Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

医学 安慰剂 可视模拟标度 四分位间距 随机对照试验 慢性疼痛 物理疗法 梅德林 类阿片 奇纳 麻醉 内科学 替代医学 受体 病理 精神科 政治学 心理干预 法学
作者
Jason W. Busse,Li Wang,Mostafa Kamaleldin,Samantha Craigie,John J. Riva,Luis Montoya,Sohail Mulla,Luciane Cruz Lopes,Nicole Vogel,Eric Chen,Karin Kirmayr,Kyle De Oliveira,Lori Olivieri,Alka Kaushal,Luis Enrique Chaparro,Inna Oyberman,Arnav Agarwal,Rachel Couban,Ludwig Tsoi,Tommy Lam,Per Olav Vandvik,Sandy Hsu,Małgorzata M Bała,Stefan Schandelmaier,Anne Scheidecker,Shanil Ebrahim,Vahid Ashoorion,Yasir Rehman,Patrick Jiho Hong,Stephanie Ross,Bradley C. Johnston,Regina Kunz,Xin Sun,Norman Buckley,Daniel I. Sessler,Gordon Guyatt
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:320 (23): 2448-2448 被引量:489
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2018.18472
摘要

Harms and benefits of opioids for chronic noncancer pain remain unclear.To systematically review randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain.The databases of CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, AMED, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to April 2018 for RCTs of opioids for chronic noncancer pain vs any nonopioid control.Paired reviewers independently extracted data. The analyses used random-effects models and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to rate the quality of the evidence.The primary outcomes were pain intensity (score range, 0-10 cm on a visual analog scale for pain; lower is better and the minimally important difference [MID] is 1 cm), physical functioning (score range, 0-100 points on the 36-item Short Form physical component score [SF-36 PCS]; higher is better and the MID is 5 points), and incidence of vomiting.Ninety-six RCTs including 26 169 participants (61% female; median age, 58 years [interquartile range, 51-61 years]) were included. Of the included studies, there were 25 trials of neuropathic pain, 32 trials of nociceptive pain, 33 trials of central sensitization (pain present in the absence of tissue damage), and 6 trials of mixed types of pain. Compared with placebo, opioid use was associated with reduced pain (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.69 cm [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.56 cm] on a 10-cm visual analog scale for pain; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 11.9% [95% CI, 9.7% to 14.1%]), improved physical functioning (WMD, 2.04 points [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.68 points] on the 100-point SF-36 PCS; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 8.5% [95% CI, 5.9% to 11.2%]), and increased vomiting (5.9% with opioids vs 2.3% with placebo for trials that excluded patients with adverse events during a run-in period). Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggested similar associations of opioids with improvements in pain and physical functioning compared with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (pain: WMD, -0.60 cm [95% CI, -1.54 to 0.34 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -0.90 points [95% CI, -2.69 to 0.89 points]), tricyclic antidepressants (pain: WMD, -0.13 cm [95% CI, -0.99 to 0.74 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -5.31 points [95% CI, -13.77 to 3.14 points]), and anticonvulsants (pain: WMD, -0.90 cm [95% CI, -1.65 to -0.14 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, 0.45 points [95% CI, -5.77 to 6.66 points]).In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with chronic noncancer pain, evidence from high-quality studies showed that opioid use was associated with statistically significant but small improvements in pain and physical functioning, and increased risk of vomiting compared with placebo. Comparisons of opioids with nonopioid alternatives suggested that the benefit for pain and functioning may be similar, although the evidence was from studies of only low to moderate quality.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
充电宝应助伯赏诗霜采纳,获得50
2秒前
ubiqutin完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
大模型应助Anquan采纳,获得30
3秒前
搜集达人应助饱满的紫伊采纳,获得30
4秒前
科研通AI5应助海鸥海鸥采纳,获得10
5秒前
ubiqutin发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
浮浮世世发布了新的文献求助50
6秒前
zoloft完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
忆韵完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
susu完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
隐形曼青应助YYJ25采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
zoloft发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
yhc完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
季生发布了新的文献求助60
13秒前
老孙完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
汤浩宏完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
yudandan@CJLU发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Zkxxxx完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
大王卡完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
22秒前
机智的紫丝完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
TT发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
田様应助啥,这都是啥采纳,获得10
26秒前
辛勤的孤容完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
27秒前
petrichor应助优美的跳跳糖采纳,获得1020
27秒前
科研通AI2S应助fleee采纳,获得10
27秒前
传奇3应助凝子老师采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
28秒前
theverve完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
ZJW完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
完美世界应助bitahu采纳,获得10
29秒前
霸王龙完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527998
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108225
关于积分的说明 9288086
捐赠科研通 2805889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540195
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716950
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709849