Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

医学 安慰剂 可视模拟标度 四分位间距 随机对照试验 慢性疼痛 物理疗法 梅德林 类阿片 奇纳 麻醉 内科学 替代医学 病理 受体 法学 精神科 心理干预 政治学
作者
Jason W. Busse,Li Wang,Mostafa Kamaleldin,Samantha Craigie,John J. Riva,Luis Montoya,Sohail Mulla,Luciane Cruz Lopes,Nicole Vogel,Eric Chen,Karin Kirmayr,Kyle De Oliveira,Lori Olivieri,Alka Kaushal,Luis Enrique Chaparro,Inna Oyberman,Arnav Agarwal,Rachel Couban,Ludwig Tsoi,Tommy Lam,Per Olav Vandvik,Sandy Hsu,Małgorzata M Bała,Stefan Schandelmaier,Anne Scheidecker,Shanil Ebrahim,Vahid Ashoorion,Yasir Rehman,Patrick Jiho Hong,Stephanie Ross,Bradley C. Johnston,Regina Kunz,Xin Sun,Norman Buckley,Daniel I. Sessler,Gordon Guyatt
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:320 (23): 2448-2448 被引量:489
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2018.18472
摘要

Harms and benefits of opioids for chronic noncancer pain remain unclear.To systematically review randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain.The databases of CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, AMED, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to April 2018 for RCTs of opioids for chronic noncancer pain vs any nonopioid control.Paired reviewers independently extracted data. The analyses used random-effects models and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to rate the quality of the evidence.The primary outcomes were pain intensity (score range, 0-10 cm on a visual analog scale for pain; lower is better and the minimally important difference [MID] is 1 cm), physical functioning (score range, 0-100 points on the 36-item Short Form physical component score [SF-36 PCS]; higher is better and the MID is 5 points), and incidence of vomiting.Ninety-six RCTs including 26 169 participants (61% female; median age, 58 years [interquartile range, 51-61 years]) were included. Of the included studies, there were 25 trials of neuropathic pain, 32 trials of nociceptive pain, 33 trials of central sensitization (pain present in the absence of tissue damage), and 6 trials of mixed types of pain. Compared with placebo, opioid use was associated with reduced pain (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.69 cm [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.56 cm] on a 10-cm visual analog scale for pain; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 11.9% [95% CI, 9.7% to 14.1%]), improved physical functioning (WMD, 2.04 points [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.68 points] on the 100-point SF-36 PCS; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 8.5% [95% CI, 5.9% to 11.2%]), and increased vomiting (5.9% with opioids vs 2.3% with placebo for trials that excluded patients with adverse events during a run-in period). Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggested similar associations of opioids with improvements in pain and physical functioning compared with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (pain: WMD, -0.60 cm [95% CI, -1.54 to 0.34 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -0.90 points [95% CI, -2.69 to 0.89 points]), tricyclic antidepressants (pain: WMD, -0.13 cm [95% CI, -0.99 to 0.74 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -5.31 points [95% CI, -13.77 to 3.14 points]), and anticonvulsants (pain: WMD, -0.90 cm [95% CI, -1.65 to -0.14 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, 0.45 points [95% CI, -5.77 to 6.66 points]).In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with chronic noncancer pain, evidence from high-quality studies showed that opioid use was associated with statistically significant but small improvements in pain and physical functioning, and increased risk of vomiting compared with placebo. Comparisons of opioids with nonopioid alternatives suggested that the benefit for pain and functioning may be similar, although the evidence was from studies of only low to moderate quality.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wwwwwxm应助妮儿采纳,获得10
刚刚
平常心发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
Charis完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
椰子发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
冷酷巧凡发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
小姚完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
孤独盼望完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
冷弦殇月完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
wangwenzhe发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
Umar完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
yyyyxxxg发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
李健应助螃蟹One采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
完美世界应助平常心采纳,获得10
5秒前
orixero应助顺利毕业呀采纳,获得10
5秒前
创希生物完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
89757完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
wangchong完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
彭于晏应助ZY采纳,获得10
6秒前
在水一方应助美丽思山采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
大湖玩家完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
carrie发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
万能图书馆应助花花采纳,获得10
6秒前
HP完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
儒雅的绮晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
Ivy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
麕麕完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
李健应助lx840518采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
lxp完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
精明的访风完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5338124
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4475332
关于积分的说明 13928100
捐赠科研通 4370553
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2401309
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1394430
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1366313