The Aerosol-Generating Effect Among Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation, High-Flow Nasal Cannula, Nonrebreather Mask, Nasal Cannula, and Ventilator-Assisted Preoxygenation

To evaluate aerosol dispersion and exposure risk during oxygenation therapy among health care personnel.This study compared the aerosol dispersion effect produced through continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), BiPAP with face coverings, a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with face coverings, nasal cannula oxygenation (NCO) at 15 L/min with face coverings, nonrebreather mask (NRM), and ventilator-assisted preoxygenation (VAPOX) during oxygenation therapy at a minute ventilation of 10 L/min and 20 L/min. The length and width of aerosol dispersion were recorded, and aerosol concentrations were then detected at a mannequin's head, trunk, and feet.The average length dispersion distance of CPAP was 47.12 cm (SD, 12.56 cm), of BiPAP was 100.13 cm (SD, 6.03 cm), of BiPAP with face coverings was 62.20 cm (SD, 8.46 cm), of HFNC with face coverings was 67.09 cm (SD, 12.74 cm); of NCO with face coverings was 85.55 cm (SD, 7.28 cm); and of NRM was 63.08 cm (SD, 15.33 cm); VAPOX showed no visible dispersion. The aerosol concentrations at the feet under CPAP and at the head under BiPAP were significantly higher than those observed without an oxygen device. Compared with no oxygen device, the aerosol concentration with HFNC was higher at the mannequin's head, trunk, and feet; whereas it was lower with VAPOX and NRM. Moreover, when translated to the number of virus particles required to infect medical personnel (Nf), VAPOX took more time to achieve Nf than other devices.Strong flow from the oxygenation devices resulted in increased aerosol concentrations. CPAP at the feet side, BiPAP at the head side, HFNC, and NCO with face coverings significantly increase aerosol exposure and should be used with caution. Aerosol concentrations at all positions were lower with NRM and VAPOX.