Maturation and survival of arteriovenous fistula: The challenge starts from the preoperative assessment stage

It is necessary to assess the association between the preoperative indicators and the maturation and survival of arteriovenous fistula (AVF).We retrospectively identified 236 patients with a new AVF created between 2016 and 2018 in our Dialysis Center.Multivariate Logistic regression showed that preoperative arterial diameter (odds ratio [OR] = 1.452, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.233, 1.710], p < 0.001), preoperative venous diameter (OR = 1.296, 95% CI [1.166, 1.477], p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR = 1.187, 95% CI [1.103, 1.277], p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.245, 95% CI [0.107, 0.560], p = 0.01) were independent influential factors for AVF maturation. Two years after the AVF surgery follow-up, multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model showed that the preoperative arterial diameter (OR = 0.510, 95% CI [0.320, 0.813], p = 0.005), preoperative venous diameter (OR = 0.940, 95% CI [0.897, 0.985], p = 0.010) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.785, 95% CI [1.117, 2.855], p = 0.016) was prognostic factors of AVF survival. The Kaplan-Meier method showed that the primary survival of AVF in patients with different preoperative arterial diameter was statistically significant (log-rank χ2 = 15.415, p < 0.001), while the secondary survival was not statistically significant (log-rank χ2 = 0.131, p = 0.717).In our cohort, the preoperative arterial and venous diameter and diabetes mellitus were independent influential factors for AVF maturation and prognostic factors of AVF survival. However, the preoperative LVEF only associated with the maturation of AVF. Meanwhile, smaller arterial diameter (≤2.15 mm) was associated with AVF maturation failure, but did not impact secondary survival of AVF.