Manchester Intermittent versus Daily Diet App Study (MIDDAS): A pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes

Abstract Aims To test the feasibility and potential efficacy of remotely supported intermittent low‐energy diets (ILEDs) and continuous low‐energy diets (CLEDs) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing the two approaches. Materials and methods Seventy‐nine adults with overweight/obesity and T2D (≤8 years duration) were randomized 1:1 to CLED (8 weeks/56 days of daily Optifast 820 kcal (3430 kJ) diet) or isoenergetic ILED (2 days of Optifast and 5 days of a Mediterranean diet/week for 28 weeks). Weight maintenance/continued weight loss was undertaken for the remainder of the 52 weeks. Both groups received frequent telephone or the Oviva app support. Feasibility outcomes included study uptake, retention, app usage, dietary adherence, weight loss and change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 52 weeks. Results We enrolled 39 ILED and 40 CLED participants and 27 (69%) ILED and 30 CLED (75%) attended the 52‐week follow‐up. Eighty‐nine per cent (70 of 79) started using the app and 86% (44 of 51) still used the app at 52 weeks. Intention‐to‐treat analysis at 52 weeks showed percentage weight loss was mean (95% confidence interval) −5.4% (−7.6, −3.1%) for ILED and −6.0% (−7.9, −4.0%) for CLED. HbA1c <48 mmol/mol was achieved in 42% of both groups. Mean (95% confidence interval) changes in the T2D medication effect score were 0.0008 (−0.3, 0.3) for ILED and −0.5 (−0.8, −0.3) for CLED. Conclusion The study shows the feasibility and potential efficacy of remotely delivered ILED and CLED programmes for weight loss and HbA1c reduction, and the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing the two approaches.