The effectiveness, safety and tolerability of ketamine for depression in adolescents and older adults: A systematic review

耐受性 氯胺酮 医学 心理信息 随机对照试验 自杀意念 抗抑郁药 系统回顾 精神科 萧条(经济学) 荟萃分析 毒物控制 梅德林 临床心理学 不利影响 自杀预防 内科学 急诊医学 焦虑 法学 经济 宏观经济学 政治学
作者
Joshua D. Di Vincenzo,Ashley Siegel,Orly Lipsitz,Roger Ho,Kayla M. Teopiz,Jason M. Ng,Leanna M.W. Lui,Kangguang Lin,Bing Cao,Nelson B. Rodrigues,Hartej Gill,Roger S. McIntyre,Joshua D. Rosenblat
出处
期刊:Journal of Psychiatric Research [Elsevier]
卷期号:137: 232-241 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.058
摘要

The majority of antidepressant medication trials have focused on adult populations (ages 18–65), with much less research in older and younger populations. Moreover, key differences in the efficacy and safety of antidepressants have been identified between these age groups. Ketamine has emerged as a promising new treatment for treatment resistant depression (TRD). The objective of this review is to summarize and synthesize the extant literature on the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of ketamine for depression in special age populations (age ≤18 and ≥ 60). Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed, searching EMBASE, PsycInfo, and PubMed from inception through July 2020. Studies reporting the use of any ketamine formulation with variable routes of administration to treat clinically diagnosed depression in adolescents or older adults were included. Thirteen studies were included in the analysis and ten observed rapid (≤2 week latency) antidepressant effects following ketamine treatments, with better outcomes following larger, repeated doses, and in open-label rather than blinded settings. Two case reports in adolescents assessed measures of suicidal ideation and both found ketamine to effectuate rapid anti-suicidal effects. Ketamine appears to be safe and well-tolerated in adolescents and older adults. The small quantity, high heterogeneity, and generally low quality of available studies precludes statistical syntheses and significantly limits the strength of our conclusions. Preliminary proof-of-concept studies are promising, however, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to ascertain effectiveness, safety and tolerability in these groups.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
杨婷婷发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
梅子发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
慕迎蕾发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
荼荼完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
含蓄的行恶完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
大宇完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
桂花酒酿完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
ding应助赖道之采纳,获得10
5秒前
particularc发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
真实的亦凝完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Paula_xr发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
猩心完成签到 ,获得积分20
7秒前
Shane完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI2S应助神秘面筋男采纳,获得10
8秒前
wwl完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
YJL发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
mqthhh发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
YY发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
handan发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
particularc完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
务实的梦松完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
成李钰发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
万能图书馆应助奶茶菌采纳,获得10
16秒前
爆米花应助灰灰12138采纳,获得10
16秒前
怡然若雁发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
kaka发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
20秒前
阿杜阿杜完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
jjwwhahaha发布了新的文献求助30
23秒前
斯文败类应助ekko采纳,获得10
26秒前
小离心机完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
mqthhh完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
雪白的迎波完成签到,获得积分20
29秒前
高分求助中
rhetoric, logic and argumentation: a guide to student writers 1000
QMS18Ed2 | process management. 2nd ed 1000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
A Chronicle of Small Beer: The Memoirs of Nan Green 1000
From Rural China to the Ivy League: Reminiscences of Transformations in Modern Chinese History 900
Eric Dunning and the Sociology of Sport 850
The Cambridge Introduction to Intercultural Communication 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2917050
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2557888
关于积分的说明 6918527
捐赠科研通 2217639
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1178604
版权声明 588438
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 576850