荟萃分析
血压
内科学
联想(心理学)
医学
环境科学
心理学
心理治疗师
作者
Yu Zhao,Wen-Wen Bao,Bo‐Yi Yang,Jinghong Liang,Zhaohuan Gui,Shan Huang,Yi-Can Chen,Guang‐Hui Dong,Yajun Chen
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152513
摘要
Many studies have investigated the association between greenspaces and blood pressure (BP), but the results remain mixed. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the evidence concerning greenspaces with BP levels and prevalent hypertension. Systematic literature searches were performed in Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase up to 25 April 2021. Combined effect estimates were calculated using random-effect models for each greenspace exposure assessment method that had been examined in ≥3 studies. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias were also conducted. Of 38 articles (including 52 analyses, 5.2 million participants in total) examining the effects of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) (n = 23), proportion of greenspace (n = 11), distance to greenspace (n = 9), and others (n = 9) were identified. Most studies (65%) reported beneficial associations between greenspaces and BP levels/hypertension. Our results of meta-analyses showed that higher NDVI500m was significantly associated with lower levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP = -0.77 mmHg, 95%CI: -1.23 to -0.32) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP = -0.32 mmHg, 95%CI: -0.57 to -0.07). We also found that NDVI in different buffers and the proportion of greenspaces were significantly associated with lower odds (1-9%) of hypertension. However, no significant effect was found for distance to greenspaces. In summary, our results indicate the beneficial effects of greenspace exposure on BP and hypertension. However, future better-designed studies, preferably longitudinal, are needed to confirm and better quantify the observed benefits in BP and/or hypertension.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI