Shared decision‐making in routine breast cancer care in Germany—A cross‐sectional study

医学 乳腺癌 家庭医学 德国的 患者满意度 患者参与 医疗保健 横断面研究 偏爱 癌症 护理部 内科学 考古 病理 经济 历史 微观经济学 经济增长
作者
Stefan Feiten,Isabelle Scholl,J. Dünnebacke,Marcus Schmidt,Arno Franzen,W Ernst,Heike Spaderna,Rudolf Weide
出处
期刊:Psycho-oncology [Wiley]
卷期号:31 (7): 1120-1126 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1002/pon.5898
摘要

Many preference-sensitive decisions have to be made in breast cancer care and little is known about the decision-making processes between breast cancer patients and the different health care professionals engaged in their treatment.All female breast cancer patients who underwent surgery in four German breast centers between 07/2016 and 12/2018 were invited to fill in a survey. The decision-making process was evaluated using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and a German measure to assess satisfaction with care (ZAPA). The higher the total score (0-100), the higher the experienced degree of participation and satisfaction, respectively. Participants were asked to separately rate consultations with their inpatient hospital doctors, outpatient gynecologists, outpatient oncologists and primary care providers. An overall mean score for the degree of participation and the satisfaction with care was calculated for each patient across all consultations assessed. Differences between the 4 treating physician groups were analyzed as well.Of 1068 approached patients, 563 with a mean age of 62 and a standard deviation (SD) of 12.2 years filled in the survey (response rate: 53%). The overall SDM-Q-9 score was 73.8 (SD: 20.8). Older patients stated a higher level of participation than younger, different physician groups were rated quite similarly. Overall satisfaction with care was 87.4 (SD: 15.5).Overall, patients reported to have experienced a high level of shared decision-making (SDM) and were quite satisfied with their treatment. However, we do not know whether non-responders might have had different experiences.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
踏实的怜菡完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
小蘑菇应助良辰采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
竹桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
葵屿完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Kyrie完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
自信的坤发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
wgm完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
hhyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
xiaojian_291发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
细心香烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
星际舟完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
英俊丹寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
复杂易文发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
小六子123完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
weizhi完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
专注的安卉完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
zhang完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
金蛋蛋完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
科研通AI5应助百里如雪采纳,获得10
20秒前
for_abSCI完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
jing完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
田様应助gapsong采纳,获得10
22秒前
zhaxiao发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
粗犷的灵松完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
包容友儿完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
黄柠檬完成签到,获得积分20
27秒前
Hindiii完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
wanci应助yangyang采纳,获得10
29秒前
chenxilulu完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
善学以致用应助高贵季节采纳,获得10
30秒前
GSQ发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
研友_LpQGjn完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 104th edition 1000
Density Functional Theory: A Practical Introduction, 2nd Edition 890
Izeltabart tapatansine - AdisInsight 600
Introduction to Comparative Public Administration Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe, Third Edition 3rd edition 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3761136
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3305089
关于积分的说明 10132226
捐赠科研通 3019082
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1657974
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 791747
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 754608