加强流行病学观察研究报告
观察研究
检查表
范围(计算机科学)
医学
梅德林
队列研究
医学教育
循证医学
优势和劣势
心理学
家庭医学
报告审判综合标准
流行病学
替代医学
计算机科学
政治学
病理
法学
程序设计语言
认知心理学
社会心理学
作者
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke
出处
期刊:The Lancet
[Elsevier]
日期:2007-10-01
卷期号:370 (9596): 1453-1457
被引量:11389
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x
摘要
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies.A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI