医学
临床肿瘤学
肿瘤科
索引(排版)
内科学
医学物理学
临床实习
癌症
家庭医学
万维网
计算机科学
作者
Edward C. Li,Jessica K. DeMartino
出处
期刊:Journal of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network
日期:2010-08-01
卷期号:8 (Suppl_5): S-9
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2010.0128
摘要
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) develops and communicates the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) to oncologists and other clinicians. The NCCN Guidelines are widely recognized and applied as the standard for clinical policy in the United States. These guidelines and related documents, such as the NCCN Drugs & Biologics Compendium (NCCN Compendium), are used extensively by public and private payors as the basis for the setting of coverage policies. Given the demand for comparative effectiveness (CE) analyses, as described and discussed in this report, the NCCN has begun work on a paradigm to integrate evidence-based CE analysis into the NCCN Guidelines deliberative process. This report presents NCCN's initial thinking on the use of NCCN expert panel members in developing a process that can be used to compare health care technologies (e.g., radiation modalities, chemotherapy regimens) in a formal, systematic way. Draft considerations are provided to stimulate discussion and feedback, particularly in the oncology community, as NCCN moves through processes such as methodologic review, validation of rating scales, and review of implications for public policy, toward finalization of an NCCN CE analytic paradigm.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI