Technology Dominance in Complex Decision Making: The Case of Aided Credibility Assessment

可靠性 决策辅助工具 欺骗 任务(项目管理) 优势(遗传学) 计算机科学 心理学 决策支持系统 决策分析 知识管理 应用心理学 社会心理学 人工智能 医学 工程类 病理 化学 统计 法学 系统工程 替代医学 基因 生物化学 数学 政治学
作者
Matthew L. Jensen,Paul Benjamin Lowry,Jude K. Burgoon,Jay F. Nunamaker
出处
期刊:Journal of Management Information Systems [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:27 (1): 175-202 被引量:76
标识
DOI:10.2753/mis0742-1222270108
摘要

Abstract Decision aids have long been an important source of help in making structured decisions. However, decision support for more complex problems has been much more difficult to create. Decision aids are now being developed for very complex problems, and their effects among low- and high-task-knowledge individuals are still being explored. One such task is credibility assessment, in which message recipients or observers must determine a message's veracity and trustworthiness. Credibility assessment is made difficult by lack of constraints, hidden or incomplete information, and mistaken beliefs of the assessor. The theory of technology dominance (TTD) proposes that technology is most effectively applied in intelligent decision aids when an experienced user is paired with a sophisticated decision aid. This work examines TT D in the complex task of credibility assessment. To assist in credibility assessment, we created a decision aid that augments the capabilities of the user—whether novice or professional. Using hypotheses based on TT D, we tested the decision aid using high-stakes deception in recorded interviews and involved both student (novice) and law enforcement (professional) users. Both professionals and novices improved their assessment accuracy by using the decision aid. Consistent with TTD, novices were more reliant on the decision aid than were professionals. However, contrary to TTD, there was no significant difference in the way novices and professionals interacted with the system, and the decision aid was not more beneficial to professionals. Novices and professionals frequently discounted the aid's recommendations, and in many cases professionals did not view explanations when the decision aid contradicted their assessments. Potential reasons for these findings, as well as limitations and future research opportunities, are discussed. Keywords: credibilitycredibility assessmentdeceptiondeception detectiondecision aidsdecision makingtheory of technology dominance (TTD)

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
猪猪hero应助漂亮的雁露采纳,获得10
刚刚
细心的山槐完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
刚刚
积极的铃铛完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
Dengera完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
4秒前
kemovezh完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
fgd应助优秀的枕头采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
平常白凝发布了新的文献求助70
7秒前
7秒前
TRISTE完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
可爱曼易完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
李健应助开整吧采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
fanghao完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
闪闪书桃完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
zhanglh发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
完美世界应助无糖可乐采纳,获得10
15秒前
suwan完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Jotaro发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
枯木逢春完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
杪123完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
上官若男应助kemovezh采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
zhanglh完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
爱卿5271发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
吴南宛发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
ali8ba完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
Vicky完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
T/CIET 1202-2025 可吸收再生氧化纤维素止血材料 500
Interpretation of Mass Spectra, Fourth Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3956697
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3502715
关于积分的说明 11109873
捐赠科研通 3233579
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1787443
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 870685
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 802152