Technology Dominance in Complex Decision Making: The Case of Aided Credibility Assessment

可靠性 决策辅助工具 欺骗 任务(项目管理) 优势(遗传学) 计算机科学 心理学 决策支持系统 决策分析 知识管理 应用心理学 社会心理学 人工智能 医学 工程类 病理 化学 统计 法学 系统工程 替代医学 基因 生物化学 数学 政治学
作者
Matthew L. Jensen,Paul Benjamin Lowry,Jude K. Burgoon,Jay F. Nunamaker
出处
期刊:Journal of Management Information Systems [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:27 (1): 175-202 被引量:76
标识
DOI:10.2753/mis0742-1222270108
摘要

Abstract Decision aids have long been an important source of help in making structured decisions. However, decision support for more complex problems has been much more difficult to create. Decision aids are now being developed for very complex problems, and their effects among low- and high-task-knowledge individuals are still being explored. One such task is credibility assessment, in which message recipients or observers must determine a message's veracity and trustworthiness. Credibility assessment is made difficult by lack of constraints, hidden or incomplete information, and mistaken beliefs of the assessor. The theory of technology dominance (TTD) proposes that technology is most effectively applied in intelligent decision aids when an experienced user is paired with a sophisticated decision aid. This work examines TT D in the complex task of credibility assessment. To assist in credibility assessment, we created a decision aid that augments the capabilities of the user—whether novice or professional. Using hypotheses based on TT D, we tested the decision aid using high-stakes deception in recorded interviews and involved both student (novice) and law enforcement (professional) users. Both professionals and novices improved their assessment accuracy by using the decision aid. Consistent with TTD, novices were more reliant on the decision aid than were professionals. However, contrary to TTD, there was no significant difference in the way novices and professionals interacted with the system, and the decision aid was not more beneficial to professionals. Novices and professionals frequently discounted the aid's recommendations, and in many cases professionals did not view explanations when the decision aid contradicted their assessments. Potential reasons for these findings, as well as limitations and future research opportunities, are discussed. Keywords: credibilitycredibility assessmentdeceptiondeception detectiondecision aidsdecision makingtheory of technology dominance (TTD)

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
顺利达发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
友好数据线完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
UGO发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
勤奋的星星完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
ChatGPT发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
学术混子发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
xingqing完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
领导范儿应助bo采纳,获得10
12秒前
dmr完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
学术混子完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
优雅的东完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
ChatGPT发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
UGO发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
David完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
咔哧咔哧发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
32秒前
魁梧的觅松完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
随机发完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
LL完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
英俊的铭应助顺利达采纳,获得10
36秒前
雨后星晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
Yuyu完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
43秒前
UGO发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
咔哧咔哧完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
虚心岂愈完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
甘sir完成签到 ,获得积分0
47秒前
顺利达完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
虚心白凡完成签到,获得积分20
51秒前
收皮皮完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
一切顺利完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
贝贝完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
ChatGPT发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
隐形曼青应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
57秒前
snow完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Freddy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
CQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
AnnualResearch andConsultation Report of Panorama survey and Investment strategy onChinaIndustry 1000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 1000
Engineering for calcareous sediments : proceedings of the International Conference on Calcareous Sediments, Perth 15-18 March 1988 / edited by R.J. Jewell, D.C. Andrews 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
2026 Hospital Accreditation Standards 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6262640
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8084737
关于积分的说明 16891551
捐赠科研通 5333263
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2838951
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1816358
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1670134