摘要
HomeRadiologyVol. 253, No. 2 PreviousNext Submissions to Radiology: Our Top 10 List of Statistical ErrorsDeborah Levine, Alexander A. Bankier, Elkan F. HalpernDeborah Levine, Alexander A. Bankier, Elkan F. HalpernAuthor Affiliations1From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 (D.L., A.A.B.); and Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (E.F.H.).Address correspondence to D.L. (e-mail: [email protected]).Deborah LevineAlexander A. BankierElkan F. HalpernPublished Online:Nov 1 2009https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2532090759MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In AbstractWe thought it would be helpful to our authors to summarize our suggestions for avoiding a number of the most common errors and problem issues in statistical analysis that we encounter in submissions to Radiology.© RSNA, 2009 References 1 Eng J . Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied? Radiology 2003;227(2):309–313. Link, Google Scholar2 Eng J . Sample size estimation: a glimpse beyond simple formulas. Radiology 2004;230(3):606–612. Link, Google Scholar3 Applegate KE , Crewson PE . An introduction to biostatistics. Radiology 2002;225(2):318–322. Link, Google Scholar4 Applegate KE , Crewson PE . Statistical literacy. Radiology 2004;230(3):613–614. Link, Google Scholar5 Sunshine JH , Applegate KE . Technology assessment for radiologists. Radiology 2004;230(2):309–314. Link, Google Scholar6 Sonnad SS . Describing data: statistical and graphical methods. Radiology 2002;225(3):622–628. Link, Google Scholar7 Halpern EF , Gazelle GS . Probability in radiology. Radiology 2003;226(1):12–15. Link, Google Scholar8 Medina LS , Zurakowski D . Measurement variability and confidence intervals in medicine: why should radiologists care? Radiology 2003;226(2):297–301. Link, Google Scholar9 Zou KH , Fielding JR , Silverman SG , Tempany CM . Hypothesis testing I: proportions. Radiology 2003;226(3):609–613. Link, Google Scholar10 Zou KH , Tuncali K , Silverman SG . Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 2003;227(3):617–622. Link, Google Scholar11 Tello R , Crewson PE . Hypothesis testing II: means. Radiology 2003;227(1):1–4. [Published correction appears in Radiology 2003;229(3):934]. Link, Google Scholar12 Langlotz CP . Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research. Radiology 2003;228(1):3–9. Link, Google Scholar13 Kundel HL , Polansky M . Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003;228(2):303–308. Link, Google Scholar14 Sistrom CL , Garvan CW . Proportions, odds, and risk. Radiology 2004;230(1):12–19. Link, Google Scholar15 Obuchowski NA . Special Topics III: bias. Radiology 2003;229(3):617–621. Link, Google Scholar16 Obuchowski NA . Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003;229(1):3–8. Link, Google Scholar17 Gareen IF , Gatsonis C . Primer on multiple regression models for diagnostic imaging research. Radiology 2003;229(2):305–310. Link, Google Scholar18 Gonen M , Panageas KS , Larson SM . Statistical issues in analysis of diagnostic imaging experiments with multiple observations per patient. Radiology 2001;221(3):763–767. Link, Google Scholar19 Proto AV . Radiology 2002: statistical concept series [editorial]. Radiology 2002;225(2):317. Link, Google Scholar20 Bossuyt PM , Reitsma JB , Bruns DE , et al.. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology 2003;226(1):24–28. Link, Google Scholar21 Smidt N , Rutjes AW , van der Windt DA , et al.. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2005;235(2):347–353. Link, Google Scholar22 Wilczynski NL . Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication—before-and-after study. Radiology 2008;248(3):817–823. Link, Google Scholar23 Bland JM , Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307–310. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived May 1, 2009; final version accepted June 1.Published in print: Nov 2009 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByHow Has Statistical Testing in Orthopedics Changed Over Time? An Assessment of High Impact Journals Over 25 YearsBradley K.Alexander, Kyle D.Paul, SpauldingSolar, KellyChen, SheilaMallenahalli, GeraldMcGwin, AshishShah, BrentPonce2023Jul1 | Journal of Surgical Education, Vol. 80, No. 7Bias, Noise, and Consensus Interpretation in RadiologyGrayson L. Baird, Michael H. Bernstein, Michael K. Atalay, 16 August 2022 | Radiology, Vol. 305, No. 3Radiomic Analysis: Study Design, Statistical Analysis, and Other Bias Mitigation StrategiesChaya S. Moskowitz, Mattea L. Welch, Michael A. Jacobs, Brenda F. Kurland, Amber L. Simpson, 17 May 2022 | Radiology, Vol. 304, No. 2Access to statistical support for medical imaging research: questionnaire survey of UK radiology traineesS.Z.Campbell, J.Y.Kuah, M.Hall-Craggs, T.Parry, S.Mallett, S.Halligan2022 | Clinical Radiology, Vol. 77, No. 12Reliability of Human Lumbar Facet Joint Degeneration Severity Assessed by Magnetic Resonance ImagingJoshua W.Little, ThomasGrieve, JosephCantu, William C.Bogar, RudyHeiser, HeatherMiley, Gregory D.Cramer2020 | Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Vol. 43, No. 1Metastatic Versus Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on MRI: A Blinded, Multicenter, and Multispecialty Observer Agreement EvaluationEstanislaoArana, Francisco M.Kovacs, AnaRoyuela, BeatrizAsenjo, FatimaNagib, SandraPérez-Aguilera, MaríaDejoz, AlbertoCabrera-Zubizarreta, YolandaGarcía-Hidalgo, AnaEstremera, __2020 | Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Vol. 18, No. 3Statistical Reporting in Nursing Research: Addressing a Common Error in Reporting of p Values (p = .000)YanniWu, ChunlanZhou, RunWang, XiaolingYe, LixiaoYang, ChaixiuLi, MingyuHu, WeilianCong2020 | Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 52, No. 6Radiomics in peritumoral non-enhancing regions: fractional anisotropy and cerebral blood volume improve prediction of local progression and overall survival in patients with glioblastomaJung YounKim, Min JaeYoon, Ji EunPark, Eun JungChoi, JonghoLee, Ho SungKim2019 | Neuroradiology, Vol. 61, No. 11Machine Learning Techniques for Space WeatherMarcoLoog2018Statistical Power in Plant Pathology ResearchDavid H.Gent, Paul D.Esker, Alissa B.Kriss2018 | Phytopathology®, Vol. 108, No. 1Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews-meta-analyses of imaging studiesTrevor A.McGrath, Matthew D.F.McInnes, Felipe W.Langer, JihoHong, Daniël A.Korevaar, Patrick M.M.Bossuyt2017 | European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 93Kappa statistic to measure agreement beyond chance in free-response assessmentsMarcCarpentier, ChristopheCombescure, LauraMerlini, Thomas V.Perneger2017 | BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 1Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed JournalJi EunPark, KyunghwaHan, Yu SubSung, Mi SunChung, Hyun JungKoo, Hee MangYoon, Young JunChoi, Seung SooLee, Kyung WonKim, YoungbinShin, SuahAn, Hyo-MinCho, Seong HoPark2017 | Korean Journal of Radiology, Vol. 18, No. 6Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient and quantitative kinetic parameters for predicting additional malignancy in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancerHyunkyungYoo, Hee JungShin, SeungheeBaek, Joo HeeCha, HyunjiKim, Eun YoungChae, Hak HeeKim2014 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 32, No. 7Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: Ratio of Right Ventricular Volume to Left Ventricular Volume as a Marker of Right Ventricular DilatationMateusz Śpiewak, , Łukasz A. Małek, , Joanna Petryka, , Łukasz Mazurkiewicz, , Konrad Werys, , Elżbieta K. Biernacka, , Mirosław Kowalski, , Piotr Hoffman, , Marcin Demkow, , Jolanta Miśko, , and Witold Rużyłło, 1 October 2012 | Radiology, Vol. 265, No. 1Getting to Yes: The Fate of Neuroradiology Manuscripts Rejected by Radiology over a 2-year PeriodAnkaj Khosla, , Robert J. McDonald, , Lutz Bornmann, , and David F. Kallmes, 1 July 2011 | Radiology, Vol. 260, No. 1Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast‐enhanced kineticsS. C.Partridge, H.Rahbar, R.Murthy, X.Chai, B. F.Kurland, W. B.DeMartini, C. D.Lehman19 January 2011 | Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 65, No. 6Considerations of Prevalence and Reporting Environment for Achieving Realistic Test ConditionsSian Taylor-Phillips, , 1 March 2011 | Radiology, Vol. 258, No. 3Probability of malignancy for lesions detected on breast MRI: a predictive model incorporating BI-RADS imaging features and patient characteristicsWendy B.DeMartini, Brenda F.Kurland, Robert L.Gutierrez, C. CraigBlackmore, SuePeacock, Constance D.Lehman2011 | European Radiology, Vol. 21, No. 8Factors influencing the uptake of 18F-fluoroestradiol in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancerLanell M.Peterson, Brenda F.Kurland, Jeanne M.Link, Erin K.Schubert, SvetlanaStekhova, Hannah M.Linden, David A.Mankoff2011 | Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Vol. 38, No. 7New Developments in Observer Performance Methodology in Medical ImagingDev P.Chakraborty2011 | Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 6Consensus Interpretation in Imaging Research: Is There a Better Way?1Alexander A. Bankier, , Deborah Levine, , Elkan F. Halpern, , and Herbert Y. Kressel, 1 October 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 257, No. 1Regional effects of age and sex in magnetic resonance spectroscopyJ.M.García Santos, L.J.Fuentes, J.B.Vidal, M.Antequera, S.Torres Del Río, C.Antúnez, G.Ortega2010 | Radiología (English Edition), Vol. 52, No. 4Efecto regional, de la edad y el sexo en la espectroscopia por resonancia magnética cerebralJ.M.García Santos, L.J.Fuentes, J.B.Vidal, M.Antequera, S.Torres Del Río, C.Antúnez, G.Ortega2010 | Radiología, Vol. 52, No. 4Recommended Articles Quality Improvement Report: Design and Implementation of a Radiology E-Consult ServiceRadioGraphics2023Volume: 43Issue: 12Multireader Diagnostic Accuracy Imaging Studies: Fundamentals of Design and AnalysisRadiology2022Volume: 303Issue: 1pp. 26-34Eye Movements of Radiologists Reflect Expertise in CT Study Interpretation: A Potential Tool to Measure Resident DevelopmentRadiology2016Volume: 281Issue: 3pp. 805-815What Should Radiology Residency and Fellowship Training in Artificial Intelligence Include? A Trainee's Perspective—Radiology In TrainingRadiology2021Volume: 299Issue: 2pp. E243-E245Measuring Interrater ReliabilityRadiology2023Volume: 309Issue: 3See More RSNA Education Exhibits Optimizing The Radiologist Work Environment: Actionable Tips To Improve Workplace Satisfaction, Efficiency, And Minimize Burnout!Digital Posters2020Added Diagnostic Value of Portable Dual-energy Chest X-ray in a Non-radiological Reviewing EnvironmentDigital Posters2022Certifications, Audits, And National Benchmarks: Breaking Down The Basics For The New Mammography AttendingDigital Posters2021 RSNA Case Collection Hypertrophic Pyloric StenosisRSNA Case Collection2020Basilar Tip AnuersymRSNA Case Collection2022Carotid WebRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 253, No. 2 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download