[18F]Fluorthanatrace PET in Ovarian Cancer: Comparison with [18F]FDG PET, Lesion Location, Tumor Grade, and Breast Cancer Gene Mutation Status
乳腺癌
核医学
癌症
卵巢癌
医学
内科学
作者
Joanna K. Weeks,Austin R. Pantel,Sarah B. Gitto,Fang Liu,Erin K. Schubert,Daniel A. Pryma,Michael D. Farwell,David A. Mankoff,Robert H. Mach,Fiona Simpkins,Lilie L. Lin
Poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibitors have improved ovarian cancer treatment outcomes. However, clinical response remains heterogeneous. Existing biomarkers, mainly breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2), are suboptimal. New tools are needed to guide patient selection. In this study, [18F]fluorthanatrace ([18F]FTT), a PET radiotracer for imaging PARP1, was compared with [18F]FDG and tumor features commonly assessed in ovarian cancer. Methods: Subjects with epithelial ovarian cancer underwent both [18F]FTT and [18F]FDG PET before new oncologic treatment. The SUVmax of [18F]FTT and [18F]FDG was compared between lesions. [18F]FTT SUVmax was compared with tumor location, tumor grade, and germline or somatic BRCA1/2 status. Linear mixed models were fitted to identify subject-level differences. Results: Fifty-five lesions were identified in 14 subjects. No correlation was found between [18F]FTT SUVmax and [18F]FDG SUVmax per lesion, supporting distinct molecular targets. [18F]FTT uptake varied widely across lesions, with no significant differences between mean SUVmax and tumor location, grade, or BRCA1/2 status. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that [18F]FTT PET may provide unique information on ovarian cancer distinct from [18F]FDG PET and commonly assessed tumor features. Our results imply a wide range of PARP1 expression in the studied ovarian tumors not explained by [18F]FDG PET, location, grade, or mutational status.